Performance Analysis of LEO Satellite-Based IoT Networks in the Presence of Interference

This paper explores a star-of-star topology for an internet-of-things (IoT) network using mega low Earth orbit constellations where the IoT users broadcast their sensed information to multiple satellites simultaneously over a shared channel. The satellites use amplify-and-forward relaying to forward the received signal to the ground station (GS), which then combines them coherently using maximal ratio combining. A comprehensive outage probability (OP) analysis is performed for the presented topology. Stochastic geometry is used to model the random locations of satellites, thus making the analysis general and independent of any constellation. The satellites are assumed to be visible if their elevation angle is greater than a threshold, called a mask angle. Statistical characteristics of the range and the number of visible satellites are derived for a given mask angle. Successive interference cancellation (SIC) and capture model (CM)-based decoding schemes are analyzed at the GS to mitigate interference effects. The average OP for the CM-based scheme, and the OP of the best user for the SIC scheme are derived analytically. Simulation results are presented that corroborate the derived analytical expressions. Moreover, insights on the effect of various system parameters like mask angle, altitude, number of satellites and decoding order are also presented. The results demonstrate that the explored topology can achieve the desired OP by leveraging the benefits of multiple satellites. Thus, this topology is an attractive choice for satellite-based IoT networks as it can facilitate burst transmissions without coordination among the IoT users.Comment: Submitted to IEEE IoT Journa

The Art of Defending: A Systematic Evaluation and Analysis of LLM Defense Strategies on Safety and Over-Defensiveness

As Large Language Models (LLMs) play an increasingly pivotal role in natural language processing applications, their safety concerns become critical areas of NLP research. This paper presents Safety and Over-Defensiveness Evaluation (SODE) benchmark: a collection of diverse safe and unsafe prompts with carefully designed evaluation methods that facilitate systematic evaluation, comparison, and analysis over 'safety' and 'over-defensiveness.' With SODE, we study a variety of LLM defense strategies over multiple state-of-the-art LLMs, which reveals several interesting and important findings, such as (a) the widely popular 'self-checking' techniques indeed improve the safety against unsafe inputs, but this comes at the cost of extreme over-defensiveness on the safe inputs, (b) providing a safety instruction along with in-context exemplars (of both safe and unsafe inputs) consistently improves safety and also mitigates undue over-defensiveness of the models, (c) providing contextual knowledge easily breaks the safety guardrails and makes the models more vulnerable to generating unsafe responses. Overall, our work reveals numerous such critical findings that we believe will pave the way and facilitate further research in improving the safety of LLMs