The Prospective Evaluation of the Net Effect of Red Blood Cell Transfusions in Routine Provision of Palliative Care.

"Final publication is available from Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2017.0072” This author accepted manuscript is made available following 12 month embargo from date of publication (June 2017) in accordance with the publisher’s archiving policyBackground Red Blood Cell (RBC) transfusions are commonly used in palliative care. RBCs are a finite resource, transfusions carry risks, and the net effect (benefits and harms) is poorly defined for people with life-limiting illnesses. Aim The aim of this study was to examine the indications and the effects of RBC transfusion in palliative care patients. Design This international, multisite, prospective consecutive cohort study assessed target symptoms (fatigue, breathlessness, generalised weakness, or dizziness) prior to transfusion and at day 7 by treating clinicians, using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Assessment of harms was made at day 2. Setting/participants One-hundred and one transfusions with day 7 followup were collected. Median age was 72·0 (IQR 61·5-83·0) years, 58% male, and mean Australian-modified Karnofsky Performance Status of 48 (SD 17). Results A mean 2·1 (SD 0·6) units was transfused. The target symptom was fatigue (61%), breathlessness (16%), generalized weakness (12%), dizziness (6%) or other (5%). Forty-nine percent of transfusions improved the primary target symptom, and 78% of transfusions improved at least one of the target symptoms. Harms were infrequent and mild. An AKPS of 40-50% was associated with higher chances of symptomatic benefit in the target symptom, however no other predictors of response were identified. Conclusions In the largest prospective consecutive case series to date, clinicians generally reported benefit, with minimal harms. Ongoing work is required to define the optimal patient- and clinician-reported haematological and functional outcome measures to optimise the use of donor blood and minimise transfusion-associated risk

Extended-Release Morphine for Chronic Breathlessness in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension—A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study

This author accepted manuscript is made available following 12 month embargo from date of publication (July 2019) in accordance with the publisher’s archiving policy. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.Context Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) affects people of all ages and is associated with poor prognosis. Chronic breathlessness affects almost all people with PAH. Objectives This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study aimed to evaluate the effects of regular, low-dose, extended-release (ER) morphine for PAH-associated chronic breathlessness. Methods Participants with PAH-associated chronic breathlessness were randomized to 1) seven days of ER morphine 20 mg, 2) seven-day washout, and 3) seven days of identically looking placebo, or vice versa. Primary end points were breathlessness “right now”—morning and evening—measured with a Visual Analogue Scale. Secondary end points included additional breathlessness measures, quality of life, function, harms, and blinded treatment preference (ACTRN12609000209291). Results Within a period of seven years, 50 patients were assessed in detail and 23 (46%) were randomized (despite broad eligibility criteria). Four participants withdrew while taking morphine. Nineteen participants completed the study. Breathlessness “right now” was higher on morphine compared with placebo both for morning [mean (M) ± SD 31.7 ± 25 mm vs. 26.9 ± 22 mm; effect size (80% CI) = −0.22 (−0.6 to 0.2)] and evening [(M ± SD 33.5 ± 28 mm vs. 25.6 ± 21 mm; effect size (80% CI) = −0.33 (−0.8 to 0.1)]. All secondary measures of breathlessness were higher with morphine as were nausea and constipation. Conclusion This study does not support a Phase III study of ER morphine for people with PAH-associated chronic breathlessness. Recruiting to the target sample size was difficult, the direction of effect in every measure of breathlessness favored placebo and morphine generated more harms.This work was supported by discretionary funds held by the Discipline, Palliative and Supportive Services, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia