Body mass index trajectories in young adulthood predict nonâ alcoholic fatty liver disease in middle age: The CARDIA cohort study

Background & AimsNonâ alcoholic fatty liver disease is an epidemic. Identifying modifiable risk factors for nonâ alcoholic fatty liver disease development is essential to design effective prevention programmes. We tested whether 25â year patterns of body mass index change are associated with midlife nonâ alcoholic fatty liver disease.MethodsIn all, 4423 participants from Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults, a prospective populationâ based biracial cohort (age 18â 30), underwent body mass index measurement at baseline (1985â 1986) and 3 or more times over 25 years. At Year 25, 3115 had liver fat assessed by nonâ contrast computed tomography. Nonâ alcoholic fatty liver disease was defined as liver attenuation â ¤40 Hounsfield Units after exclusions. Latent mixture modelling identified 25â year trajectories in body mass index per cent change (%Î ) from baseline.ResultsWe identified four distinct trajectories of BMI%Î : stable (26.2% of cohort, 25â year BMI %Π = 3.1%), moderate increase (46.0%, BMI%Π = 21.7%), high increase (20.9%, BMI%Π = 41.9%) and extreme increase (6.9%, BMI%Π = 65.9%). Y25 nonâ alcoholic fatty liver disease prevalence was higher in groups with greater BMI %Î : 4.1%, 9.3%, 13.0%, and 17.6%, respectively (Pâ trend <.0001). In multivariable analyses, participants with increasing BMI%Î had increasingly greater odds of nonâ alcoholic fatty liver disease compared to the stable group: OR: 3.35 (95% CI: 2.07â 5.42), 7.80 (4.60â 13.23) and 12.68 (6.68â 24.09) for moderate, high and extreme body mass index increase, respectively. Associations were only moderately attenuated when adjusted for baseline or Y25 body mass index.ConclusionsTrajectories of weight gain during young adulthood are associated with greater nonâ alcoholic fatty liver disease prevalence in midlife independent of metabolic covariates and baseline or concurrent body mass index highlighting the importance of weight maintenance throughout adulthood as a target for primary nonâ alcoholic fatty liver disease prevention.Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142937/1/liv13603.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142937/2/liv13603_am.pd

Twentyâ fiveâ year trajectories of insulin resistance and pancreatic βâ cell response and diabetes risk in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Background & AimsInsulin resistance is a risk marker for nonâ alcoholic fatty liver disease, and a risk factor for liver disease progression. We assessed temporal trajectories of insulin resistance and βâ cell response to serum glucose concentration throughout adulthood and their association with diabetes risk in nonâ alcoholic fatty liver disease.MethodsThree thousand and sixty participants from Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults, a prospective biâ racial cohort of adults age 18â 30 years at baseline (1985â 1986; Y0) who completed up to 5 exams over 25 years and had fasting insulin and glucose measurement were included. At Y25 (2010â 2011), nonâ alcoholic fatty liver disease was assessed by noncontrast computed tomography after exclusion of other liver fat causes. Latent mixture modelling identified 25â year trajectories in homeostatic model assessment insulin resistance and βâ cell response homeostatic model assessmentâ β.ResultsThree distinct trajectories were identified, separately, for homeostatic model assessment insulin resistance (lowâ stable [47%]; moderateâ increasing [42%]; and highâ increasing [12%]) and homeostatic model assessmentâ β (lowâ decreasing [16%]; moderateâ decreasing [63%]; and highâ decreasing [21%]). Y25 nonâ alcoholic fatty liver disease prevalence was 24.5%. Among nonâ alcoholic fatty liver disease, highâ increasing homeostatic model assessment insulin resistance (referent: lowâ stable) was associated with greater prevalent (OR 95% CI = 8.0, 2.0â 31.9) and incident (OR = 10.5, 2.6â 32.8) diabetes after multivariable adjustment including Y0 or Y25 homeostatic model assessment insulin resistance. In contrast, nonâ alcoholic fatty liver disease participants with lowâ decreasing homeostatic model assessmentâ β (referent: highâ decreasing) had the highest odds of prevalent (OR = 14.1, 3.9â 50.9) and incident (OR = 10.3, 2.7â 39.3) diabetes.ConclusionTrajectories of insulin resistance and βâ cell response during young and middle adulthood are robustly associated with diabetes risk in nonâ alcoholic fatty liver disease. Thus, how persons with nonâ alcoholic fatty liver disease develop resistance to insulin provides important information about risk of diabetes in midlife above and beyond degree of insulin resistance at the time of nonâ alcoholic fatty liver disease assessment.Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146427/1/liv13747_am.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146427/2/liv13747.pd

Increasing prevalence of cirrhosis among insured adults in the United States, 2012–2018

Background Liver cirrhosis is a chronic disease that is known as a “silent killer” and its true prevalence is difficult to describe. It is imperative to accurately characterize the prevalence of cirrhosis because of its increasing healthcare burden. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, trends in cirrhosis prevalence were evaluated using administrative data from one of the largest national health insurance providers in the US. (2011–2018). Enrolled adult (≥18-years-old) patients with cirrhosis defined by ICD-9 and ICD-10 were included in the study. The primary outcome measured in the study was the prevalence of cirrhosis 2011–2018. Results Among the 371,482 patients with cirrhosis, the mean age was 62.2 (±13.7) years; 53.3% had commercial insurance and 46.4% had Medicare Advantage. The most frequent cirrhosis etiologies were alcohol-related (26.0%), NASH (20.9%) and HCV (20.0%). Mean time of follow-up was 725 (±732.3) days. The observed cirrhosis prevalence was 0.71% in 2018, a 2-fold increase from 2012 (0.34%). The highest prevalence observed was among patients with Medicare Advantage insurance (1.67%) in 2018. Prevalence increased in each US. state, with Southern states having the most rapid rise (2.3-fold). The most significant increases were observed in patients with NASH (3.9-fold) and alcohol-related (2-fold) cirrhosis. Conclusion Between 2012–2018, the prevalence of liver cirrhosis doubled among insured patients. Alcohol-related and NASH cirrhosis were the most significant contributors to this increase. Patients living in the South, and those insured by Medicare Advantage also have disproportionately higher prevalence of cirrhosis. Public health interventions are important to mitigate this concerning trajectory of strain to the health system

Insulin Resistance Exacerbates Genetic Predisposition to Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Individuals Without Diabetes

Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/149741/1/hep41353.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/149741/2/hep41353_am.pd

Evaluation of recipients with significant comorbidity - Patients with cardiovascular disease.

Liver transplant(ation) (LT) is the most effective treatment for patients with decompensated liver disease. The increasing prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes and the growing number of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease being evaluated for LT, have resulted in a greater proportion of LT candidates presenting with a higher risk of cardiovascular disease. As cardiovascular disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after LT, a thorough cardiovascular evaluation pre-LT is crucial. In this review, we discuss the latest evidence on the cardiovascular evaluation of LT candidates and we focus on the most prevalent conditions, namely ischaemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation and other arrhythmias, valvular heart disease, and cardiomyopathies. LT candidates undergo an electrocardiogram, a resting transthoracic echocardiography and an assessment of their cardiopulmonary functional ability as part of their standardised pre-LT work-up. Further diagnostic work-up is undertaken based on the results of the baseline evaluation and may include a coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. The evaluation of potential LT candidates for cardiovascular disease requires a multidisciplinary approach, with input from anaesthetists, cardiologists, hepatologists and transplant surgeons

Evaluation of recipients with significant comorbidity – Patients with cardiovascular disease

Liver transplant(ation) (LT) is the most effective treatment for patients with decompensated liver disease. The increasing prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes and the growing number of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease being evaluated for LT, have resulted in a greater proportion of LT candidates presenting with a higher risk of cardiovascular disease. As cardiovascular disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after LT, a thorough cardiovascular evaluation pre-LT is crucial. In this review, we discuss the latest evidence on the cardiovascular evaluation of LT candidates and we focus on the most prevalent conditions, namely ischaemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation and other arrhythmias, valvular heart disease, and cardiomyopathies. LT candidates undergo an electrocardiogram, a resting transthoracic echocardiography and an assessment of their cardiopulmonary functional ability as part of their standardised pre-LT work-up. Further diagnostic work-up is undertaken based on the results of the baseline evaluation and may include a coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. The evaluation of potential LT candidates for cardiovascular disease requires a multidisciplinary approach, with input from anaesthetists, cardiologists, hepatologists and transplant surgeons