Proton pump inhibitors and the risk of colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use is associated with increased serum gastrin levels and bacterial overgrowth, resulting in more toxic bile salt formation. Concern has risen that these factors may increase the risk of developing colorectal neoplasia. AIM: To investigate the association between the use of PPIs and the risk of colorectal cancer. METHODS: A population-based case-control study was conducted within the Dutch Primary Care Information (IPCI) database over the period 1996-2005. Cases with colorectal cancer were matched with up to 20 controls on age, gender, calendar time, and duration of follow-up prior to diagnosis. Cumulative exposure to PPIs was assessed in the 5 yr prior to diagnosis with a 1-yr lag time analysis. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using multivariate, conditional logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Within the source population of 457,024 persons, we identified 595 colorectal cancer cases. The odds of colorectal cancer were not increased among patients ever using PPIs compared with patients who never used PPIs (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.63-1.16). Also, the use of PPIs for > 365 days was not associated with a greater risk of colorectal cancer (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.44-1.41) compared with nonusers. The odds of colorectal cancer in neither the right nor the left hemicolon were significantly increased in patients using PPIs. CONCLUSION: The present study indicates no association between PPI use and the risk of colorectal cancer. Larger numbers of long-term PPI users are needed to confirm the absence of a risk-increasing effect of long-term PPI exposure

Evaluation of the colorectal cancer screening Programme in the Basque Country (Spain) and its effectiveness based on the Miscan-colon model

The population-based Basque Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Programme started in 2009 with a biennial immunochemical quantitative test (FIT) biennial and colonoscopy under sedation in positive cases. The population target of 586,700 residents was from 50 to 69 years old and the total coverage was reached at the beginning of 2014. The aim of our study was to determine possible scenarios in terms of incidence, mortality and reduction of Life-years-Lost (L-y-L) in the medium and long term of CRC. Methods: Invitations were sent out by the Programme from 2009 to 2014, with combined organizational strategies. Simulation was done by MISCAN-colon (Microsimulation Screening Analysis) over 30 years comparing the results of screening vs no-screening, taking the population-based Cancer Registry into account. Lifetime population and real data from the Programme were used from 2008 to 2012. The model was run differentially for men and women. Results: 924,416 invitations were sent out from 2009 to 2014. The average participation rate was 68.4%, CRC detection rate was 3.4% and the Advanced Adenoma detection rate was 24.0‰, with differences observed in sex and age. Future scenarios showed a higher decrease of incidence (17.2% vs 14.7%), mortality (28.1% vs 22.4%) and L-y-L (22.6% vs 18.4%) in men than women in 2030. Conclusions: The Basque Country CRC Programme results are aligned to its strategy and comparable to other programmes. MISCAN model was found to be a useful tool to predict the benefits of the programme in the future. The effectiveness of the Programme has not been formally established as case control studies are required to determine long term benefits from the screening strategy