Lower Extremity Complaints in Runners and Other Athletes

Running is one of the most accessible sports, and probably for this reason, is practiced by many persons all over the world. However, besides the positive health effects of running there are some concerns about the high incidence of running injuries, especially to the lower extremities. The results of a systematic review on lower extremity injuries of long-distance runners showed an incidence of running injuries ranging from 19.4% to 79.3%. The results of the Rotterdam marathon revealed a one-year prevalence of 48.3%. The incidence of lower extremity injuries occurring during the marathon was 18.2%; most of these injuries occurred in the calf, knee and thigh. The following factors were associated with the occurrence of lower extremity injuries: participating more than six times in a race in the previous 12 months (OR 1.66), a history of running injuries (OR 2.62), high education level (OR 0.73) and daily smoking (OR 0.23). Among the modifiable risk factors studied, a training distance less than 40 kilometres a week is a strong protective factor of future calf injuries, and regular interval training is a strong protective factor for knee injuries. At 3-months follow-up, 25.5% of th

Physical Activity and Features of Knee Osteoarthritis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Individuals Without Osteoarthritis:A Systematic Review

Objective: To systematically review all studies that have evaluated the association between physical activity (PA) levels and features of knee osteoarthritis (OA) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for subjects without OA. Methods: The inclusion criteria for prospective studies were as follows: 1) subjects without OA; 2) average age 35–80 years; and 3) any self-reported PA or objective measurement of PA. The eligible MRI outcomes were OA-related measures of intraarticular knee joint structures. Exclusion criteria were evaluations of instant associations with transient structural changes after PA. Results: Two randomized controlled trials and 16 observational studies were included. One of 11 studies found that PA was harmfully related to cartilage volume or thickness, but 4 studies found a significant protective association. Four of 10 studies found that PA was harmfully related to cartilage defects, while others showed no significant associations. Two of 3 studies reported a significantly increased cartilage T2 value in individuals with more PA. All 3 studies reported no significant association between PA and bone marrow lesions. Two studies assessed the association between PA and meniscus pathology, in which only occupational PA involving knee bending was associated with a greater risk of progression. Conclusion: Within the sparse and diverse evidence available, no strong evidence was found for the presence or absence of an association between PA and the presence or progression of features of OA on MRI among subjects without OA. Therefore, more research is required before PA in general and also specific forms of PA can be deemed safe for knee joint structures.</p

What are the Differences in Injury Proportions Between Different Populations of Runners?:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

_Background:_ Many runners suffer from injuries. No information on high-risk populations is available so far though. _Objectives:_ The aims of this study were to systematically review injury proportions in different populations of runners and to compare injury locations between these populations. _Data Sources:_ An electronic search with no date restrictions was conducted up to February 2014 in the PubMed, Embase, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science databases. The search was limited to original articles written in English. The reference lists of the included articles were checked for potentially relevant studies. _Study Eligibility Criteria:_ Studies were eligible when the proportion of running injuries was reported and the participants belonged to one or more homogeneous populations of runners that were clearly described. Study selection was conducted by two independent reviewers, and disagreements were resolved in a consensus meeting. _Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods:_ Details of the study design, population of runners, sample size, injury definition, method of injury assessment, number of injuries and injury locations were extracted from the articles. The risk of bias was assessed with a scale consisting of eight items, which was specifically developed for studies focusing on musculoskeletal complaints. _Results:_ A total of 86 articles were included in this review. Where possible, injury proportions were pooled for each identified population of runners, using a random-effects model. Injury proportions were affected by injury definitions and durations of follow-up. Large differences between populations existed. The number of medical-attention injuries during an event was small for most populations of runners, except for ultra-marathon runners, in which the pooled estimate was 65.6 %. Time-loss injury proportions between different populations of runners ranged from 3.2 % in cross-country runners to 84.9 % in novice runners. Overall, the proportions were highest among short-distance track runners and ultra-marathon runners. _Limitations:_ The results were pooled by stratification of studies according to the population, injury definition and follow-up/recall period; however, heterogeneity was high. _Conclusions:_ Large differences in injury proportions between different populations of runners existed. Injury proportions were affected by the duration of follow-up. A U-shaped pattern between the running distance and the time-loss injury proportion seemed to exist. Future prospective studies of injury surveillance are highly recommended to take running exposure and censoring into account

The socio-economic impact of running-related injuries:A large prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of running‐related injuries (RRIs) on activities of daily living (ADL), work, healthcare utilization, and estimated costs. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with data from a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Adult recreational runners who registered for a running event (distances 5 to 42 km) were included in this study. Minimum follow‐up duration was 3 months (preparation, event participation, and post‐race period). Injuries were registered using a standardized definition. Primary outcome measure was a standardized 5‐item survey on limitations in ADL. The survey data were categorized to the number of injured runners with complete/moderate/no limitations. This outcome was expressed as the percentage of injured runners with any limitation (complete or moderate limitations amalgamated). Secondary outcomes were work absenteeism, the number of healthcare visits per injured runner, and estimated direct medical and indirect costs per participant and per RRI. RESULTS: 1929 runners (mean [SD] age 41 [12] years, 53% men) were included in this study and 883 runners (46%) sustained a RRI during the course of the study. Injured runners reported the highest limitations (% with any limitation) of RRIs during the first week of injury on sports and leisure activities (70%) and transportation activities (23%). 39% of the injured runners visited a healthcare professional. Work absenteeism due to the RRI was reported in 5% of the injured runners. The total mean estimated costs were €74 per RRI and €35 per participant. CONCLUSIONS: Injured runners are mainly limited in their transportation activities and during sports and leisure. While the estimated costs of RRIs are not high when expressed per participant, the absolute costs may be substantial due to the popularity of running

No differences in physical activity between children with overweight and children of normal-weight

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in objectively measured physical activity and in self-reported physical activity between overweight and normal-weight children. METHODS: Data from a prospective cohort study including children, presenting at the participating general practices in the south-west of the Netherlands, were used. Children (aged 4-15 years) were categorized as normal-weight or overweight using age- and sex specific cut-off points. They wore an ActiGraph accelerometer for one week to register physical activity, and filled out a diary for one week about physical activity. RESULTS: A total of 57 children were included in this study. Overweight children spent significantly less percentage time per day in sedentary behavior (β - 1.68 (95%CI -3.129, - 0.07)). There were no significant differences in percentage time per day spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity (β 0.33 (- 0.11, 0.78)). No significant differences were found between children of normal-weight and overweight in self-reported measures of physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Overweight children are not less physically active than normal-weight children, which may be associated with the risen awareness towards overweight/obesity and with implemented interventions for children with overweight/obesity

Efficacy of foot orthoses for the treatment of plantar heel pain:a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundPlantar heel pain (PHP) is common. Foot orthoses are often applied as treatment for PHP, even though there is little evidence to support this.ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of different orthoses on pain, function and self-reported recovery in patients with PHP and compare them with other conservative interventions.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesA systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, CINAHL and Google Scholar up to January 2017.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesRandomised controlled trials comparing foot orthoses with a control (defined as no intervention, sham or other type of conservative treatment) reporting on pain, function or self-reported recovery in patients with PHP.ResultsTwenty studies investigating eight different types of foot orthoses were included in the review. Most studies were of high quality. Pooled data from six studies showed no difference between prefabricated orthoses and sham orthoses for pain at short term (mean difference (MD) of 0.26 (95% CI −0.09 to 0.60)). No difference was found between sham orthoses and custom orthoses for pain at short term (MD 0.22 (95% CI −0.05 to 0.50)), nor was there a difference between prefabricated orthoses and custom orthoses for pain at short term (MD 0.03 (95% CI −0.15 to 0.22)). For the majority of other interventions, no significant differences were found.ConclusionsFoot orthoses are not superior for improving pain and function compared with sham or other conservative treatment in patients with PHP.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42015029659.</jats:sec