Vancomycin flushing reaction after intraperitoneal vancomycin: A case report

Vancomycin has been reported to cause vancomycin flushing reaction (VFR), a hypersensitivity reaction that mostly occurs after intravenous administration. The incidence of VFR in a patient receiving intraperitoneal vancomycin is rare. We report a case of a female peritoneal dialysis (PD) patient with a PD-related peritonitis who developed VFR after intraperitoneal administration of 2000 mg vancomycin. Seventy-five minutes after instillation, she developed flushing, a pruritic erythema on the upper body and swelling of the lips. Blood results revealed a vancomycin plasma concentration of 54.8 mg/L and a normal tryptase level. During a relapse of her PD-related peritonitis, vancomycin was successfully reintroduced in a 50% reduced dose. No symptoms of VFR developed, and the corresponding vancomycin plasma concentration was 33.6 mg/L. Intraperitoneal treatment was continued with 500 mg vancomycin every 2-3 days with frequently measured, adequate trough levels ranging from 15-22 mg/L. This case illustrates the risk factors for the development of VFR after intraperitoneal administration of vancomycin, namely a high and concentrated loading dose together with a low body weight, a fast peritoneal transport state and peritonitis. Reintroduction of vancomycin after occurrence of VFR is safe, but a lower loading dose or a slower instillation rate is recommended

A new design for external quality assessment for the analysis of thiopurine drugs reveals major differences between laboratories

ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to compare analytical results of 6-TGN and 6-MMPR blood level estimations between laboratories.Design and methodsParticipating laboratories were asked to select patient samples from their routine analysis and exchange these with another assigned laboratory. Because of large differences in results between laboratories, all standard operating procedures were reviewed, revealing that the origin of these differences could lie in the method of hydrolysis and the preparation of calibrator samples. To investigate the contribution of the calibrators to these differences, one participating laboratory was asked to prepare a batch of calibrators to be shipped to the participating laboratories for analysis.ResultsFor 6-TGN and 6-MMPR 43% and 24% of the results were outside of the 80-120% range. When correcting the results from the exchange of the patient samples with the results of the calibrators, the mean absolute difference for 6-TGN improved from 24.8% to 16.3% (P < 0.001), whereas the mean absolute difference for 6-MMPR slightly increased from 17.3% to 20% (P = 0.02).ConclusionThis first EQAS for thiopurine drugs shows that there is a difference between laboratories in the analysis of 6-TGN, and to a lesser extent of 6-MMPR. This difference for 6-TGN can partially be explained by the use of in-house prepared calibrators that differ among the participants

Busulfan Interlaboratory Proficiency Testing Program Revealed Worldwide Errors in Drug Quantitation and Dose Recommendations

Background:The clinical outcomes of busulfan-based conditioning regimens for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) have been improved by personalizing the doses to target narrow busulfan plasma exposure. An interlaboratory proficiency test program for the quantitation, pharmacokinetic modeling, and busulfan dosing in plasma was developed. Previous proficiency rounds (ie, the first 2) found that 67%-85% and 71%-88% of the dose recommendations were inaccurate, respectively.Methods:A proficiency test scheme was developed by the Dutch Foundation for Quality Assessment in Medical Laboratories (SKML) and consisted of 2 rounds per year, with each round containing 2 busulfan samples. In this study, 5 subsequent proficiency tests were evaluated. In each round, the participating laboratories reported their results for 2 proficiency samples (ie, low and high busulfan concentrations) and a theoretical case assessing their pharmacokinetic modeling and dose recommendations. Descriptive statistics were performed, with ±15% for busulfan concentrations and ±10% for busulfan plasma exposure. The dose recommendations were deemed accurate.Results:Since January 2020, 41 laboratories have participated in at least 1 round of this proficiency test. Over the 5 rounds, an average of 78% of the busulfan concentrations were accurate. Area under the concentration-time curve calculations were accurate in 75%-80% of the cases, whereas only 60%-69% of the dose recommendations were accurate. Compared with the first 2 proficiency test rounds (PMID 33675302, October, 2021), the busulfan quantitation results were similar, but the dose recommendations worsened. Some laboratories repeatedly submit results that deviated by more than 15% from the reference values.Conclusions:The proficiency test showed persistent inaccuracies in busulfan quantitation, pharmacokinetic modeling, and dose recommendations. Additional educational efforts have yet to be implemented; regulatory efforts seem to be needed. The use of specialized busulfan pharmacokinetic laboratories or a sufficient performance in busulfan proficiency tests should be required for HCT centers that prescribe busulfan

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Ganciclovir in Cytomegalovirus-Infected Patients With Solid Organ Transplants and Its Correlation to Efficacy and Toxicity

Background:Cytomegalovirus causes morbidity and mortality, especially in immunocompromised patients, and is treated with (val)ganciclovir. Therapeutic drug monitoring of ganciclovir is often performed; however, clinically established target trough levels corresponding to efficacy are lacking. In 2021, our clinic increased the target trough level for ganciclovir from 1 to 2 mg/L to 2-4 mg/L. This study aims to compare both target trough levels in efficacy, toxicity, and occurrence of resistance.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was performed in adult solid organ recipients treated for cytomegalovirus infection with (val)ganciclovir. Clinical efficacy was defined as the absence of treatment failure, defined as > 1 log10increase in viral load within 2 weeks of treatment initiation, therapy switch to foscarnet, and/or request for resistance analysis.Results:A total of 46 patients were involved in the study, with 200 ganciclovir trough levels obtained. The composite endpoint was recorded in 23 (69.7%) and 10 (76.9%) patients in the 1-2 mg/L and the 2-4 mg/L group, respectively (P = 0.18). No association was found between ganciclovir trough levels and the composite endpoint (P = 1.0). However, a correlation was found between ganciclovir trough levels and the occurrence of lymphopenia (P = 0.02).Conclusions:Our study could not establish a difference in clinical efficacy or toxicity between target trough levels of 1-2 mg/L or 2-4 mg/L because of the lack of clinical differences between the compared groups. However, a correlation was found between ganciclovir trough levels and lymphopenia, which warrants further investigation

Middle-up quantification of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies in human plasma with two dimensional liquid chromatography high resolution mass spectrometry: Adalimumab as a proof of principle

Next generation human therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (t-mAbs) are harder to quantify with the widely used bottom-up tryptic digestion method. Due to their homology with endogenous immunoglobulins, there is a lack of unique and stable 'signature' peptides that can be targeted. Middle-up two dimensional liquid chromatography high resolution mass spectrometry (2D-LC-HRMS), targeting the entire light chain, was examined as an alternative. Adalimumab (ADM) was successfully quantified in human plasma after Melon® Gel sample purification, followed by orthogonal separation on a weak cation exchange (WCX) and reversed phase column. Charge and hydrophobicity were used to separate ADM from the polyclonal immunoglobulin background. HRMS with its high resolution and exact mass was able to isotopically resolve the ADM light chain and to provide another separation dimension on the basis of mass to charge ratio. Using the targeted single ion monitoring (T-SIM) with multiplex (MSX) option, three ADM light chain precursors, 2341.80, 2129.00, and 1951.68 m/z, and one internal standard precursor 2146.39 m/z, were measured simultaneously. The Melon® Gel sample purification was found to be very efficient in removing plasma proteins that would otherwise interfere with chromatographic separation and ionization. The linearity of the method for the analysis of ADM was excellent (R2=0.999) between 1 - 128 mg/L with an LLOQ signal to noise ratio (S/N) of 10. Within-run and between-run precision and accuracy were in concordance with the EMA guideline. Cross-validation of the 2D-LC-HRM method with the standard peptide LC-MS/MS method showed a good agreement (R2 = 0.86) between the methods. However, there was a bias present, possibly due to charge variant ADM formation over time. Since the presented 2D-LC-HRMS method is able to measure only the native form of ADM, it is able to provide a measure of the active form of ADM in patients

Continuous infusion of cefiderocol in a critically ill patient with continuous venovenous haemofiltration

Cefiderocol is a broad-spectrum cephalosporin antibiotic and is indicated in patients with difficult-to-treat Gram-negative bacterial infections. Cefiderocol is applied as a 2–4-times daily prolonged 3-h infusion. The therapeutic target of cefiderocol suggests that continuous infusion (CI) may be advantageous, since it is more likely to achieve 100% of time of the unbound concentration above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC). However, limited information on cefiderocol as CI has been assessed. We present a case of a critically ill 37-year-old woman with continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVH) treated with a CI of cefiderocol for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. She received 4 g per 24 h, in accordance with the recommendations for the total daily dose during CVVH with an effluent flow rate of 2.1–3 L/h. We evaluated intraperitoneal, plasma arterial pre- and postfilter and ultrafiltrate (urine) total cefiderocol concentrations and discussed the pharmacokinetics in respect to the CVVH settings. The predicted unbound plasma concentrations during CI resulted in 6.8–9.5-fold higher concentrations than the adopted MIC of 2 mg/L for cefiderocol against P. aeruginosa. The optimal time of the unbound concentration >MIC target of cefiderocol was met during the sampling period, suggesting adequate exposure during the total treatment period. The obtained intraperitoneal concentration indicated adequate cefiderocol exposure at the site of infection. Continuous infusion of 4 g cefiderocol per 24 h led to sufficient plasma concentrations in our anuric critically ill patient treated with CVVH. This case is supportive to the use of cefiderocol as continuous infusion