Treating homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia in a real-world setting: Experiences with lomitapide

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH) is a rare genetic disease characterised by markedly elevated plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C). Lomitapide is a microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) inhibitor approved as an adjunct to other lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs), with or without lipoprotein apheresis (LA), for the treatment of adult HoFH. Diet with <20% calories from fat is required. Due to a varying genetic and phenotypic profile of patients with HoFH, individual patients may respond to therapy differently; therefore examining individual cases in a 'real-world' setting provides valuable information on the effective day-to-day management of HoFH cases. Four HoFH cases were selected for analysis and discussion: a 20-year-old female compound heterozygote; a 62-year old female homozygote; a 42-year-old female compound heterozygote; and a 36-year-old male homozygote. Each patient was commenced on lomitapide according to the prescribed protocol and subjected to routine follow-up. All four patients experienced clinically meaningful reductions in LDL-C levels of 35-73%. Three of the patients had evidence of steatosis or mildly elevated liver function tests) before lomitapide was started, but effects of lomitapide on hepatic function were not universal. Three of the patients experienced gastrointestinal adverse events, but were managed with appropriate dietary control. Lomitapide is an effective adjunct LLT in the management of patients with HoFH, with or without LA. Real-world use of lomitapide has a side-effect profile consistent with clinical trials and one that can be managed by adherence to recommendations on dose escalation, dietary modification and dietary supplements

First clinical experiences with inclisiran in a real-world setting

Background and objective: Inclisiran is the first-in-class small interfering RNA (siRNA) PCSK9 inhibitor. In clinical trials inclisiran showed effective and sustained LDL-C reduction of ± 50 %. As data in clinical setting are scarce, we aim to investigate the efficacy and safety in clinical practice. Methods:We describe a registry of consecutive patients who started with inclisiran at a lipid clinic of a university hospital. Patients were eligible if they fulfilled the reimbursement criteria in the Netherlands. Patients were included if they started with inclisiran as first line (group 1) or switched from PCSK9 monoclonal antibody (mAbs) to inclisiran (group 2). LDL-C levels were measured at 3 and 9 months after initiation of inclisiran. Median change of LDL-C levels was calculated on an individual and group level. Results: We analysed 65 patients (36 women), median [25th percentile; 75th percentile] age of 63 [54; 68] years. Of these, 44 patients had both a 3 month and 9 month visit. At 3 months, patients who newly started inclisiran (group 1, n = 45) showed a LDL-C decrease of 38 [-49;-33] %. Patients who used statins as co-medication (n = 15) had a higher median LDL-C decrease compared to those without statin use (n=30; 45 % vs 38 %). However, patients who switched from mAbs to inclisiran (group 2, n = 20) had an increase in LDL-C of 38 [+4; +97] %. Adverse effects associated with inclisiran were mild and consisted of mild injection site reactions. Efficacy was slightly less whereas safety results were similar at 9 months. Conclusion: Our initial experience of inclisiran in a clinical setting showed less reduction in LDL-C levels compared to clinical trials but a similar safety profile. Moreover, patients who switched from PCSK9 mAbs to inclisiran generally showed an increase in LDL-C levels implying that inclisiran is less potent in LDL-C reduction compared to PCSK9 mAbs.</p