Choledochoduodenostomy versus hepaticojejunostomy – a matched case–control analysis

Background: Choledochoduodenostomy (CD) is believed to cause certain long-term complications, such as sump syndrome and reflux gastritis. Therefore, CD is considered inferior to a Roux-and-Y hepaticojejunostomy (HJ). The aim of this study was to compare short- and long-term outcomes following CD and HJ for benign biliary diseases. Methods: This was a retrospective, matched case-control study of patients undergoing biliary-digestive anastomosis for benign diseases between 2000 and 2016 in a tertiary centre. Patients undergoing CD and HJ were matched 1:1 based on age, sex, ASA-classification, indication, history of abdominal surgery or acute cholecystitis/pancreatitis. Short- and long-term outcomes were compared. Results: Of 336 patients undergoing biliary-digestive anastomoses, 27 patients underwent CD. Matching resulted in two comparable groups of 26 patients each. Overall morbidity after HJ and CD was comparable: 30.8% versus 26.9% (p>0.999). Long-term complications occurred in 23.1% after HJ, and in 50% after CD (p=0.118). After CD, 2 patients (7.7%) developed sump syndrome. Both patients with an anastomotic stricture after HJ could be managed by endoscopic/radiological re-intervention, whilst all six patients with a stricture after CD required surgical re-intervention (p=0.016). Conclusion: Although short-term complications were comparable, the number of anastomotic strictures was higher in patients undergoing CD. We therefore conclude that HJ is the biliary bypass of choice while CD should be performed in selected patients only

Right-sided resection with standard or selective portal vein resection in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score analysis

Background: Standard portal vein resection (PVR) has been proposed to improve oncological outcomes in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC), however it potentially introduces an increased risk of morbidity. The policy in Amsterdam UMC(AMC) is to resect the portal vein bifurcation selectively when involved, while in Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, standard PVR is performed with right trisectionectomy. The objective of this study was to analyze postoperative outcomes and survival after standard or selective PVR for PHC. Methods: A retrospective study was performed including PHC-patients undergoing right-sided resection in Amsterdam (2000–2018) and Berlin (2005–2015). Primary outcomes were 90-day mortality, severe morbidity (Clavien-Dindo≥3), and overall survival (OS). A propensity score comparison (1:1 ratio) was performed corrected for age/sex/ASA/jaundice/tumor diameter/N-stage/Bismuth-Corlette type-IV. Results: A total of 251 patients who underwent right-sided resection for PHC were evaluated: 87 in the selective (Amsterdam) and 164 in the standard PVR-group (Berlin). Major differences in baseline characteristics were observed, with higher ASA and AJCC-stage in the standard PVR-group (Berlin). Severe morbidity and 90-day mortality were comparable before matching (selective/Amsterdam:68% and 19%, standard/Berlin:61% and 17%,p = 0.284 and p = 0.746, respectively). After propensity score matching, both short term outcomes and OS were comparable (selective/Amsterdam (n = 45) 33 months (95%CI:20–45), standard/Berlin (n = 45) 31 months (95%CI:24–38,p = 0.747)). Conclusion: In this combined cohort, standard PVR was not associated with increased severe morbidity or mortality. After propensity score matching, survival was comparable after selective (Amsterdam) and standard PVR (Berlin)

Morbidity and mortality after major liver resection in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Morbidity and mortality after hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma are known to be high. However, reported postoperative outcomes vary, with notable differences between Western and Asian series. We aimed to determine morbidity and mortality rates after major hepatectomy in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and assess differences in outcome regarding geographic location and hospital volume. Methods: A systematic review was performed by searching the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases through November 20, 2017. Risk of bias was assessed and meta-analysis and metaregression were performed using a random effects model. Results: A total of 51 studies were included, representing 4,634 patients. Pooled 30-day and 90-day mortality were 5% (95% CI 3%–6%) and 9% (95% CI 6%–12%), respectively. Pooled overall morbidity and severe morbidity were 57% (95% CI 50%–64%) and 40% (95% CI 34%–47%), respectively. Western studies compared with Asian studies had a significantly higher 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, and overall morbidity: 8% versus 2% (P < .001), 12% versus 3% (P < .001), and 63% versus 54% (P = .048), respectively. This effect on mortality remained significant after correcting for hospital volume. Univariate metaregression analysis showed no influence of hospital volume on mortality or morbidity, but when corrected for geographic location, higher hospital volume was associated with higher severe morbidity (P = .039). Conclusion: Morbidity and mortality rates after major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma are high. The Western series showed a higher mortality compared with the Asian series, even when corrected for hospital volume. Standardized reporting of outcomes is necessary. Underlying causes for differences in outcomes between Asian and Western centers, such as differences in treatment strategies, should be further analyzed

Yield of Screening for COVID-19 in Asymptomatic Patients Before Elective or Emergency Surgery Using Chest CT and RT-PCR (SCOUT): Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the yield of preoperative screening for COVID-19 with chest CT and RT-PCR in patients without COVID-19 symptoms. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Many centers are currently screening surgical patients for COVID-19 using either chest CT, RT-PCR or both, due to the risk for worsened surgical outcomes and nosocomial spread. The optimal design and yield of such a strategy are currently unknown. METHODS: This multicenter study included consecutive adult patients without COVID-19 symptoms who underwent preoperative screening using chest CT and RT-PCR before elective or emergency surgery under general anesthesia. RESULTS: A total of 2093 patients without COVID-19 symptoms were included in 14 participating centers; 1224 were screened by CT and RT-PCR and 869 by chest CT only. The positive yield of screening using a combination of chest CT and RT-PCR was 1.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8-2.1]. Individual yields were 0.7% (95% CI: 0.2-1.1) for chest CT and 1.1% (95% CI: 0.6-1.7) for RT-PCR; the incremental yield of chest CT was 0.4%. In relation to COVID-19 community prevalence, up to ∼6% positive RT-PCR was found for a daily hospital admission rate >1.5 per 100,000 inhabitants, and around 1.0% for lower prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: One in every 100 patients without COVID-19 symptoms tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 with RT-PCR; this yield increased in conjunction with community prevalence. The added value of chest CT was limited. Preoperative screening allowed us to take adequate precautions for SARS-CoV-2 positive patients in a surgical population, whereas negative patients needed only routine procedures

Yield of Screening for COVID-19 in Asymptomatic Patients Before Elective or Emergency Surgery Using Chest CT and RT-PCR (SCOUT): Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the yield of preoperative screening for COVID-19 with chest CT and RT-PCR in patients without COVID-19 symptoms. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Many centers are currently screening surgical patients for COVID-19 using either chest CT, RT-PCR or both, due to the risk for worsened surgical outcomes and nosocomial spread. The optimal design and yield of such a strategy are currently unknown. METHODS: This multicenter study included consecutive adult patients without COVID-19 symptoms who underwent preoperative screening using chest CT and RT-PCR before elective or emergency surgery under general anesthesia. RESULTS: A total of 2093 patients without COVID-19 symptoms were included in 14 participating centers; 1224 were screened by CT and RT-PCR and 869 by chest CT only. The positive yield of screening using a combination of chest CT and RT-PCR was 1.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8-2.1]. Individual yields were 0.7% (95% CI: 0.2-1.1) for chest CT and 1.1% (95% CI: 0.6-1.7) for RT-PCR; the incremental yield of chest CT was 0.4%. In relation to COVID-19 community prevalence, up to ∼6% positive RT-PCR was found for a daily hospital admission rate >1.5 per 100,000 inhabitants, and around 1.0% for lower prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: One in every 100 patients without COVID-19 symptoms tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 with RT-PCR; this yield increased in conjunction with community prevalence. The added value of chest CT was limited. Preoperative screening allowed us to take adequate precautions for SARS-CoV-2 positive patients in a surgical population, whereas negative patients needed only routine procedures