Use of chromogenic peptide substrates in the determination of clotting factors II, VII, IX and X in normal plasma and in plasma of patients treated with oral anticoagulants

Spectrophotometric methods were used to assay the clotting factors II, VII, IX and X in plasma of 33 subjectively healthy human donors and in plasma of 98 patients receiving long-term oral anticoagulant therapy. In 33 normal subjects the interindividual variations in the plasma activities of the clotting factors II, VII, IX and X are respectively 12.2, 21.4, 11.0 and 15.0%. After correction for the assay variations the remaining biological variations are respectively 11.7, 21.2, 9.7 and 14.8%. Plasma from 98 patients receiving long-term anticoagulant therapy was assayed with ‘Thrombotest’, a clotting test in whole blood introduced by Owren and in these plasmas the activity of each of the vitamin K-dependent factors was assayed with spectrophotometric methods. For the clotting factors IX and VII, novel spectrophotometric methods were applied and the plasma activities thus measured were compared to results obtained with factor IX and VII clotting assays. Chromogenic activities of the different factors were correlated among each other and with 1/Thrombotest values. When the therapeutic range for Thrombotest values is set between 5 and 12.5% the corresponding therapeutic ranges for the activity of the factors II, VII, IX and X are respectively 12.6–36.1, 27.0–52.3, 23.1–49.3 and 18.9–36.2% (expressed as a percentage of the activity in normal pool plasma). The chromogenic assays for the factors II, VII, IX and X provide the same information on the therapeutic state of the patients in respectively 86.7, 78.6, 81.6 and 89.8% of the cases. Finally we discuss the suitability of the different assays to monitor oral anticoagulant therapy

Pharmacokinetics of C1-inhibitor in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Klinische Chemie 27(2),69(2002) -- Nederlandse Vereniging voor Klinische Chemie en Laboratoriumgeneeskunde --

Pharmacokinetics of C1-inhibitor protein in patients with acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES: C1-inhibitor protein (C1-INH) purified from pooled human plasma is used for the treatment of patients with hereditary angioedema. Recently, the beneficial effects of high-dose C1-INH treatment on myocardial ischemia or reperfusion injury have been reported in various animal models and in humans. We investigated the pharmacokinetic behavior of C1-INH in patients with acute myocardial infarction to calculate the amount of C1-INH required for optimal efficacy. METHODS: Twenty-two patients received an intravenous loading dose, followed by 48 hours of continuous infusion of C1-INH. Changes in the endogenous production of C1-INH were evaluated in 16 control patients with acute myocardial infarction. A 2-compartment model was used to estimate the fractional catabolic rate constant (FCR), transcapillary escape rate constant (TER), and extravascular return rate constant (ERR) of C1-INH. Software designed to analyze and fit measured data to unknown parameters in a system of differential equations was used to fit the experimental data against the 3-parameter model. RESULTS: With fixed TER and ERR values (0.014 h(-1) and 0.018 h(-1), respectively), 20 of the 22 cases yielded well-determined FCR values, and simultaneous fitting resulted in a median FCR of 0.011 h(-1) (95% confidence interval, 0.010 to 0.012 h(-1)) versus 0.025 h(-1) as reported in healthy control patients. Simultaneous estimation of TER, ERR, and FCR demonstrated weakly defined TER and ERR values, whereas the median FCR value remained unchanged. The use of a 2-compartment model resulted in a significantly better fit compared with the 1-compartment model. Physiologic explanations are offered for discrepancies in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: Dose calculation of C1-INH in patients treated with massive doses of C1-INH requires turnover parameters that differ from those found in healthy subjects, possibly because of suppression of continuous C1-INH consumption by target protease

High-sensitive Troponin T assay for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction: An economic evaluation

__Abstract__ Background: Delayed diagnosis and treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) has a major adverse impact on prognosis in terms of both morbidity and mortality. Since conventional cardiac Troponin assays have a low sensitivity for diagnosing AMI in the first hours after myocardial necrosis, high-sensitive assays have been developed. The aim of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of a high-sensitive Troponin T assay (hsTnT), alone or combined with the heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) assay in comparison with the conventional cardiac Troponin (cTnT) assay for the diagnosis of AMI in patients presenting to the hospital with chest pain.Methods: We performed a cost-utility analysis (quality adjusted life years-QALYs) and a cost effectiveness analysis (life years gained-LYGs) based on a decision analytic model, using a health care perspective in the Dutch context and a life time time-horizon. The robustness of model predictions was explored using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.Results: For a life time incremental cost of 30.70 Euros, use of hsTnT over conventional cTnT results in gain of 0.006 Life Years and 0.004 QALY. It should be noted here that hsTnT is a diagnostic intervention which costs only 4.39 Euros/test more than the cTnT test. The ICER generated with the use of hsTnT based diagnostic strategy comparing with the use of a cTnT-based strategy, is 4945 Euros per LYG and 7370 Euros per QALY. The hsTnT strategy has the highest probability of being cost effective at thresholds between 8000 and 20000 Euros per QALY. The combination of hsTnT and h-FABP strategy's probability of being cost effective remains lower than hsTnT at all willingness to pay thresholds.Conclusion: Our analysis suggests that hsTnT assay is a very cost effective diagnostic tool relative to conventional TnT assay. Combination of hsTnT and H-FABP does not offer any additional economic and health benefit over hsTnT test alone