The Association Between Exposure to COVID-19 and Mental Health Outcomes Among Healthcare Workers

Due to the unprecedented impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care systems, there has been great interest in the mental wellbeing of healthcare workers. While most studies investigated mental health outcomes among frontline vs. non-frontline healthcare workers, little is known about the impact of various work-related variables. The present study aimed to examine the association between work-related [i.e., having contact with COVID-19 patients, being redeployed due to the pandemic and availability of sufficient personal protective equipment (PPE)] and subjective (i.e., worries about getting infected or infecting others) exposures and self-reported mental health outcomes (i.e., psychological distress, depressive symptoms, and posttraumatic stress symptoms). Between February and May 2021, 994 healthcare workers employed at a variety of healthcare settings in the Netherlands filled out an online survey as part of the COVID-19 HEalth caRe wOrkErS (HEROES) study. Mental health outcomes were measured using the General Health Questionnaire-12, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and the Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5. Approximately 13% reported depressive symptoms, 37% experienced psychological distress, and 20% reported posttraumatic stress symptoms. Multilevel linear models consisted of three levels: individual (work-related and subjective exposures), healthcare center (aggregated redeployment and availability of sufficient PPE), and regional (cumulative COVID-19 infection and death rates). Worries about infection were associated with all three mental health outcomes, whereas insufficient PPE was associated with psychological distress and depressive symptoms. There were no differences in outcomes between healthcare centers or provinces with different COVID-19 infection and death rates. Our findings highlight the importance of adequate PPE provision and the subjective experience of the COVID-19 pandemic. These factors should be part of interventions aimed at mitigating adverse mental health outcomes among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic

Accelerated brain aging as a biomarker for staging in bipolar disorder:An exploratory study

Background:Two established staging models outline the longitudinal progression in bipolar disorder (BD) based on episode recurrence or inter-episodic functioning. However, underlying neurobiological mechanisms and corresponding biomarkers remain unexplored. This study aimed to investigate if global and (sub)cortical brain structures, along with brain-predicted age difference (brain-PAD) reflect illness progression as conceptualized in these staging models, potentially identifying brain-PAD as a biomarker for BD staging. Methods:In total, 199 subjects with bipolar-I-disorder and 226 control subjects from the Dutch Bipolar Cohort with a high-quality T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scan were analyzed. Global and (sub)cortical brain measures and brain-PAD (the difference between biological and chronological age) were estimated. Associations between individual brain measures and the stages of both staging models were explored. Results:A higher brain-PAD (higher biological age than chronological age) correlated with an increased likelihood of being in a higher stage of the inter-episodic functioning model, but not in the model based on number of mood episodes. However, after correcting for the confounding factors lithium-use and comorbid anxiety, the association lost significance. Global and (sub)cortical brain measures showed no significant association with the stages. Conclusions:These results suggest that brain-PAD may be associated with illness progression as defined by impaired inter-episodic functioning. Nevertheless, the significance of this association changed after considering lithium-use and comorbid anxiety disorders. Further research is required to disentangle the intricate relationship between brain-PAD, illness stages, and lithium intake or anxiety disorders. This study provides a foundation for potentially using brain-PAD as a biomarker for illness progression.</p

Accelerated brain aging as a biomarker for staging in bipolar disorder: An exploratory study

Background Two established staging models outline the longitudinal progression in bipolar disorder (BD) based on episode recurrence or inter-episodic functioning. However, underlying neurobiological mechanisms and corresponding biomarkers remain unexplored. This study aimed to investigate if global and (sub)cortical brain structures, along with brain-predicted age difference (brain-PAD) reflect illness progression as conceptualized in these staging models, potentially identifying brain-PAD as a biomarker for BD staging. Methods In total, 199 subjects with bipolar-I-disorder and 226 control subjects from the Dutch Bipolar Cohort with a high-quality T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scan were analyzed. Global and (sub)cortical brain measures and brain-PAD (the difference between biological and chronological age) were estimated. Associations between individual brain measures and the stages of both staging models were explored. Results A higher brain-PAD (higher biological age than chronological age) correlated with an increased likelihood of being in a higher stage of the inter-episodic functioning model, but not in the model based on number of mood episodes. However, after correcting for the confounding factors lithium-use and comorbid anxiety, the association lost significance. Global and (sub)cortical brain measures showed no significant association with the stages. Conclusions These results suggest that brain-PAD may be associated with illness progression as defined by impaired inter-episodic functioning. Nevertheless, the significance of this association changed after considering lithium-use and comorbid anxiety disorders. Further research is required to disentangle the intricate relationship between brain-PAD, illness stages, and lithium intake or anxiety disorders. This study provides a foundation for potentially using brain-PAD as a biomarker for illness progression

Clinical application of staging models in bipolar disorder

The studies in this thesis explored the rationale and utility of clinical staging models in bipolar disorder. There is a need for further improvement of diagnostics in psychiatry to organize the broad range of clinical expressions, to promote a longitudinal as opposed to cross-sectional perspective, that allows for efficient communication, and may guide a personalized treatment approach. Clinical staging models are a way to operationalize illness progression and may provide a solution in overcoming these issues. Staging models have been introduced and tested for several psychiatric illnesses such as depression, schizophrenia, personality disorders, anxiety disorders, alcohol use disorder as well as a model for all major mental health disorders This thesis described one of the first attempts to explore the validity and applicability of two staging models specifically designed for bipolar disorders (BD). In this thesis, we tested the two predominant staging models for BD by applying them to clinical data. Berk et al. proposed a staging model based on the recurrence of mood episodes, in some chapters referred to as Model A. A second staging model, in some chapters referred to as Model B, was proposed by Kapczinski et al. and is based on impaired inter-episodic functioning. We used five different approaches to apply these staging models to both longitudinal as well as cross-sectional clinical data, leading to five publications. Additionally, with the Staging Taskforce of the International Society for Bipolar Disorders, we defined a standardized nomenclature for the staging of BD. Lastly, we explored the similarities and differences between our current views on illness progression with those from the late 19th and early 20th century

Clinical application of staging models in bipolar disorder

The studies in this thesis explored the rationale and utility of clinical staging models in bipolar disorder. There is a need for further improvement of diagnostics in psychiatry to organize the broad range of clinical expressions, to promote a longitudinal as opposed to cross-sectional perspective, that allows for efficient communication, and may guide a personalized treatment approach. Clinical staging models are a way to operationalize illness progression and may provide a solution in overcoming these issues. Staging models have been introduced and tested for several psychiatric illnesses such as depression, schizophrenia, personality disorders, anxiety disorders, alcohol use disorder as well as a model for all major mental health disorders This thesis described one of the first attempts to explore the validity and applicability of two staging models specifically designed for bipolar disorders (BD). In this thesis, we tested the two predominant staging models for BD by applying them to clinical data. Berk et al. proposed a staging model based on the recurrence of mood episodes, in some chapters referred to as Model A. A second staging model, in some chapters referred to as Model B, was proposed by Kapczinski et al. and is based on impaired inter-episodic functioning. We used five different approaches to apply these staging models to both longitudinal as well as cross-sectional clinical data, leading to five publications. Additionally, with the Staging Taskforce of the International Society for Bipolar Disorders, we defined a standardized nomenclature for the staging of BD. Lastly, we explored the similarities and differences between our current views on illness progression with those from the late 19th and early 20th century

Clinical profiles of subsequent stages in bipolar disorder: Results from the Dutch Bipolar Cohort

Introduction: The manifestation of bipolar disorder (BD) is hypothesized to be determined by clinical characteristics such as familial loading, childhood abuse, age at onset, illness duration, comorbid psychiatric disorders, addiction, treatment resistance, and premorbid cognitive functioning. Which of these are associated with a more severe course and worse outcome is currently unknown. Our objective is to find a combination of clinical characteristics associated with advancement to subsequent stages in two clinical staging models for BD. Methods: Using cross-sectional data from the Dutch Bipolar Cohort, staging was applied to determine the progression of bipolar-I-disorder (BD-I; N = 1396). Model A is primarily defined by recurrence of mood episodes, ranging from prodromal to chronicity. Model B is defined by level of inter-episodic functioning, ranging from prodromal to inability to function autonomously. For both models, ordinal logistic regression was conducted to test which clinical characteristics are associated with subsequent stages. Results: For model A, familial loading, childhood abuse, earlier onset, longer illness duration, psychiatric comorbidity, and treatment resistance were all predictors for a higher stage in contrast to addiction and cognitive functioning. For model B, childhood abuse, psychiatric comorbidity, cognitive functioning, and treatment resistance were predictors for a more severe stage, whereas age at onset, illness duration, and addiction were not. Discussion/conclusions: Differences in clinical characteristics across stages support the construct validity of both staging models. Characteristics associated with a higher stage largely overlapped across both models. This study is a first step toward determining different clinical profiles, with a corresponding course and outcome

The Association Between Exposure to COVID-19 and Mental Health Outcomes Among Healthcare Workers

Due to the unprecedented impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care systems, there has been great interest in the mental wellbeing of healthcare workers. While most studies investigated mental health outcomes among frontline vs. non-frontline healthcare workers, little is known about the impact of various work-related variables. The present study aimed to examine the association between work-related [i.e., having contact with COVID-19 patients, being redeployed due to the pandemic and availability of sufficient personal protective equipment (PPE)] and subjective (i.e., worries about getting infected or infecting others) exposures and self-reported mental health outcomes (i.e., psychological distress, depressive symptoms, and posttraumatic stress symptoms). Between February and May 2021, 994 healthcare workers employed at a variety of healthcare settings in the Netherlands filled out an online survey as part of the COVID-19 HEalth caRe wOrkErS (HEROES) study. Mental health outcomes were measured using the General Health Questionnaire-12, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and the Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5. Approximately 13% reported depressive symptoms, 37% experienced psychological distress, and 20% reported posttraumatic stress symptoms. Multilevel linear models consisted of three levels: individual (work-related and subjective exposures), healthcare center (aggregated redeployment and availability of sufficient PPE), and regional (cumulative COVID-19 infection and death rates). Worries about infection were associated with all three mental health outcomes, whereas insufficient PPE was associated with psychological distress and depressive symptoms. There were no differences in outcomes between healthcare centers or provinces with different COVID-19 infection and death rates. Our findings highlight the importance of adequate PPE provision and the subjective experience of the COVID-19 pandemic. These factors should be part of interventions aimed at mitigating adverse mental health outcomes among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic