Teachers’ monitoring of students’ text comprehension:can students’ keywords and summaries improve teachers’ judgment accuracy?

We investigated intra-individual monitoring and regulation in learning from text in sixth-grade students and their teachers. In Experiment 1, students provided judgments of learning (JOLs) for six texts in one of three cue-prompt conditions (after writing delayed keywords or summaries or without a cue prompt) and then selected texts for restudy. Teachers also judged their students’ learning for each text, while seeing - if present - the keywords or summaries each student had written for each text, and also selected texts for restudy. Overall, monitoring accuracy was low (.10 for students, −.02 for teachers) and did not differ between cue-prompt conditions. Regulation, indexed by the correlation between JOLs and restudy selections, was significant (−.38 for students, −.60 for teachers), but was also not affected by cue-prompt condition. In Experiment 2, teachers judged students’ comprehension of six texts without knowing the students’ names, so that only the keywords and summaries, not prior impressions, could inform judgments. Again, monitoring accuracy was generally low (.06), but higher for keywords (.23) than for summaries (−.10). These results suggest that monitoring intra-individual differences in students’ learning is challenging for teachers. Analyses of the diagnosticity and utilization of keywords suggest that these may contain insufficient cues for improving teacher judgments at this level of specificity

Histologic re-evaluation of a population-based series of renal cell carcinomas from The Netherlands Cohort Study according to the 2022 ISUP/WHO classification

The aim of the present study was to re-evaluate 457 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cases from the Netherlands Cohort Study on Diet and Cancer (NLCS), a large population-based cohort, according to the new 2022 ISUP, Genitourinary Pathology Society and World Health Organisation (WHO) classifications to assess whether newly recognized subtypes of RCC could be found among these cases. These cases were initially evaluated according to the 2004 WHO classification, the Fuhrman grading system and the 3rd version of the Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM). Data on tumor size, laterality and date of diagnosis, among other clinicopathological characteristics, were obtained through record linkage with the Netherlands Cancer Registry and the Pathologisch-Anatomisch Landelijk Geautomatiseerd Archief. Digital slides from the NLCS were reviewed by two urogenital pathologists according to the new ISUP grading and the 2022 WHO classification (5th edition). Immunohistochemistry staining for carbonic anhydrase IX was performed on cases with ambiguous morphology. A total of 373 cases of clear cell RCC (ccRCC), 61 cases of papillary RCC (pRCC), 13 cases of chromophobe RCC, 3 cases of collecting duct carcinoma and 4 cases of oncocytoma were identified. The subtyping showed no discrepancy with the previous diagnoses. A comparison of the WHO/ISUP grading to the original Fuhrman grading showed a similar grading in 245 (56.5%) cases of the total ccRCC and pRCC cases. The staging according to the novel TNM classification 8th edition showed a restaging in 286 cases (65.5%). Lymphovascular (microvascular) invasion (LVI) and tumor necrosis (TN) were present in 14.4% and 33.5% of the total number of cases, respectively. Furthermore, the presence of sarcomatoid differentiation in 5.1% and rhabdoid differentiation in 4.2% of the cases was observed. In conclusion, none of the newly accepted and emerging/provisional RCC entities were identified in the NLCS cases, which could be attributed to the high mean age (71.4 years) at diagnosis of the patients included in the present study. A restaging of the NLCS cases using the TNM 8th edition and regrading using ISUP grading was performed, which showed that it is possible to report on newer features, such as sarcomatoid differentiation and LVI, even in an old sample collection