Personalized medication adherence management in asthma and COPD:a review of effective interventions and development of a practical adherence toolkit

BACKGROUND: Medication non-adherence management of patients with asthma/COPD remains challenging. Given the multitude of underlying causes, a personalized approach is required. The Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) can identify reasons for non-adherence, but does not provide guidance on how to effectively act on results. OBJECTIVE: To develop a practical, evidence-based decision support toolkit for healthcare professionals managing adult patients with asthma and/or COPD, by matching TAI-identified adherence barriers to proven effective adherence enhancing interventions. METHODS: A literature review in PubMed and Embase was performed identifying interventions that enhanced medication adherence in adult patients with asthma and/or COPD. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in English with full-texts available were included. Effective interventions were assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool, categorized, matched with specific TAI responses and developed into a practical TAI Toolkit. The Toolkit was assessed on content and usability (System Usability Scale, SUS) by a multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals. RESULTS: Forty RCTs were included in the review. In total, seven effective interventions catergories were identified, informing the TAI Toolkit: reminders, educational interventions, motivational strategies, feedback on medication use, shared decision making, simplifying medication regimen and multiple component interventions. Healthcare professionals rated the TAI Toolkit with a mean SUS score of 71.4 (range: 57.5-80.0). CONCLUSION: Adherence can be improved using different interventions that the TAI Toolkit helps selecting. The TAI Toolkit was well received by healthcare professionals. Further research is required to test its validity, practicality and effectiveness in practice

Effectiveness, usability and acceptability of a smart inhaler programme in patients with asthma:protocol of the multicentre, pragmatic, open-label, cluster randomised controlled ACCEPTANCE trial

Introduction Suboptimal asthma control is associated with incorrect inhaler use and poor medication adherence, which could lead to unfavourable clinical and economic outcomes. Smart inhaler programmes using electronic monitoring devices (EMDs) could support self-management and increase medication adherence and asthma control. However, evidence on long-term benefits and acceptability is scarce. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of a smart inhaler asthma self-management programme on medication adherence and clinical outcomes in adults with uncontrolled asthma, to evaluate its acceptability and to identify subgroups who would benefit most based on patient characteristics.Methods and analysis This open-label cluster randomised controlled trial of 12 months will be conducted in primary care in the Netherlands. General practices will be randomly assigned to either intervention or control group. We aim to include 242 patients. The intervention consists of (1) an EMD attached to the patient’s inhaler that measures medication use; (2) a smartphone application to set medication reminders, receive motivational messages and track asthma symptoms; and (3) a portal for healthcare professionals to view data on medication use. The control group is passively monitored by the EMD but cannot view their inhaler data or receive feedback. Eligible patients are adults with suboptimal controlled asthma (Asthma Control Questionnaire score ≥0.75) with evidence of non-adherence established by the EMD during a 6-week run-in period. Primary outcome is the difference in mean medication adherence between intervention and control group. Secondary outcomes include asthma control, asthma-related quality of life, exacerbations, acceptance, cost-effectiveness and whether the effect of the intervention on medication adherence and asthma control is modified by patient characteristics (eg, self-efficacy, medication beliefs and eHealth literacy).Trial registration numberNL7854

Can electronic monitoring with a digital smart spacer support personalised medication adherence and inhaler technique education in patients with asthma?:Protocol of the randomised controlled OUTERSPACE trial

INTRODUCTION: Medication adherence and inhaler technique in patients with asthma remain suboptimal. A digital, smart spacer may support personalised adherence and inhaler technique education. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of undertaking a definitive randomised controlled trial of personalised, smart spacer data-driven education and explore clinical benefits. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We present the design of the multicentre, randomised controlled OUtcomes following Tailored Education and Retraining: Studying Performance and AdherenCE feasibility trial of 2 months. Patients will be recruited from four Dutch general practices. At t=-1, patients with asthma ≥18 years using inhaled corticosteroids±long-acting beta-agonists±short-acting beta-agonists administered with a pressurised-metered-dose-inhaler and spacer (n=40) will use a smart spacer for 1 month. The rechargeable CE-marked smart spacer (Aerochamber Plus with Flow Vu) includes a sensor that monitors adherence and inhalation technique to prescribed dosing regimen of both maintenance and reliever inhalers. After 1 month (t=0), patients are 1:1 randomised into two groups: control group (usual care) versus intervention group (personalised education). At t=-1, t=0 and t=1 month, the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire and Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) are administered and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is assessed. At t=0 and t=1, spirometry is performed. At t=1, usability and satisfaction will be analysed using the System Usability Scale and interviews with patients and healthcare providers. Primary outcome is the overall feasibility of a definitive trial assessed by patient recruitment speed, participation and drop-out rate. Secondary outcomes are patient and healthcare provider satisfaction and exploratory clinical outcomes are adherence, inhaler technique, TAI score, FeNO, lung function, ACQ and WPAI. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the RTPO in Leeuwarden, Netherlands (number: NL78361.099.21). Patients will provide written informed consent. Study findings will be disseminated through conferences and peer-reviewed scientific and professional journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL9637

Long-term cost-effectiveness of digital inhaler adherence technologies in difficult-to-treat asthma

BACKGROUND: Digital inhalers can monitor inhaler usage, support difficult-to-treat asthma management and inform step-up treatment decisions yet their economic value is unknown, hampering wide-scale implementation.OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of digital inhaler-based medication adherence management in difficult-to-treat asthma.METHODS: A model-based cost-utility analysis was performed. The Markov model structure was determined by biological and clinical understanding of asthma and was further informed by guideline-based assessment of model development. Internal and external validation was performed using the AdViSHE tool. The INCA Sun randomized clinical trial data were incorporated into the model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of digital inhalers. Several long-term clinical case scenarios were assessed (reduced number of exacerbations, increased asthma control, introduction of biosimilars [25% price-cut on biologics]).RESULTS: The long-term modelled cost-effectiveness based on a societal perspective indicated 1-year per-patient costs for digital inhalers and usual care (i.e., regular inhalers) of €7,546 and €10,752, respectively, reflecting cost savings of €3,207 for digital inhalers. Using a 10-year intervention duration and time horizon resulted incost savings of €26,309 for digital inhalers. In the first year, add-on biologic therapies accounted for 69% of the total costs in the usual care group, and for 49% in the digital inhaler group. Scenario analyses indicated consistent cost savings ranging from €2,287 (introduction biosimilars) to €4,581 (increased control, decreased exacerbations).CONCLUSION: In patients with difficult-to-treat asthma, digital inhaler based interventions can be cost-saving on the long-term by optimizing medication adherence and inhaler technique and reducing add-on biologic prescriptions.</p

Long-term cost-effectiveness of digital inhaler adherence technologies in difficult-to-treat asthma

BACKGROUND: Digital inhalers can monitor inhaler usage, support difficult-to-treat asthma management and inform step-up treatment decisions yet their economic value is unknown, hampering wide-scale implementation.OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of digital inhaler-based medication adherence management in difficult-to-treat asthma.METHODS: A model-based cost-utility analysis was performed. The Markov model structure was determined by biological and clinical understanding of asthma and was further informed by guideline-based assessment of model development. Internal and external validation was performed using the AdViSHE tool. The INCA Sun randomized clinical trial data were incorporated into the model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of digital inhalers. Several long-term clinical case scenarios were assessed (reduced number of exacerbations, increased asthma control, introduction of biosimilars [25% price-cut on biologics]).RESULTS: The long-term modelled cost-effectiveness based on a societal perspective indicated 1-year per-patient costs for digital inhalers and usual care (i.e., regular inhalers) of €7,546 and €10,752, respectively, reflecting cost savings of €3,207 for digital inhalers. Using a 10-year intervention duration and time horizon resulted incost savings of €26,309 for digital inhalers. In the first year, add-on biologic therapies accounted for 69% of the total costs in the usual care group, and for 49% in the digital inhaler group. Scenario analyses indicated consistent cost savings ranging from €2,287 (introduction biosimilars) to €4,581 (increased control, decreased exacerbations).CONCLUSION: In patients with difficult-to-treat asthma, digital inhaler based interventions can be cost-saving on the long-term by optimizing medication adherence and inhaler technique and reducing add-on biologic prescriptions.</p

Long-term cost-effectiveness of digital inhaler adherence technologies in difficult-to-treat asthma

BACKGROUND: Digital inhalers can monitor inhaler usage, support difficult-to-treat asthma management and inform step-up treatment decisions yet their economic value is unknown, hampering wide-scale implementation.OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of digital inhaler-based medication adherence management in difficult-to-treat asthma.METHODS: A model-based cost-utility analysis was performed. The Markov model structure was determined by biological and clinical understanding of asthma and was further informed by guideline-based assessment of model development. Internal and external validation was performed using the AdViSHE tool. The INCA Sun randomized clinical trial data were incorporated into the model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of digital inhalers. Several long-term clinical case scenarios were assessed (reduced number of exacerbations, increased asthma control, introduction of biosimilars [25% price-cut on biologics]).RESULTS: The long-term modelled cost-effectiveness based on a societal perspective indicated 1-year per-patient costs for digital inhalers and usual care (i.e., regular inhalers) of €7,546 and €10,752, respectively, reflecting cost savings of €3,207 for digital inhalers. Using a 10-year intervention duration and time horizon resulted incost savings of €26,309 for digital inhalers. In the first year, add-on biologic therapies accounted for 69% of the total costs in the usual care group, and for 49% in the digital inhaler group. Scenario analyses indicated consistent cost savings ranging from €2,287 (introduction biosimilars) to €4,581 (increased control, decreased exacerbations).CONCLUSION: In patients with difficult-to-treat asthma, digital inhaler based interventions can be cost-saving on the long-term by optimizing medication adherence and inhaler technique and reducing add-on biologic prescriptions.</p

Long-term cost-effectiveness of digital inhaler adherence technologies in difficult-to-treat asthma

BACKGROUND: Digital inhalers can monitor inhaler usage, support difficult-to-treat asthma management and inform step-up treatment decisions yet their economic value is unknown, hampering wide-scale implementation.OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of digital inhaler-based medication adherence management in difficult-to-treat asthma.METHODS: A model-based cost-utility analysis was performed. The Markov model structure was determined by biological and clinical understanding of asthma and was further informed by guideline-based assessment of model development. Internal and external validation was performed using the AdViSHE tool. The INCA Sun randomized clinical trial data were incorporated into the model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of digital inhalers. Several long-term clinical case scenarios were assessed (reduced number of exacerbations, increased asthma control, introduction of biosimilars [25% price-cut on biologics]).RESULTS: The long-term modelled cost-effectiveness based on a societal perspective indicated 1-year per-patient costs for digital inhalers and usual care (i.e., regular inhalers) of €7,546 and €10,752, respectively, reflecting cost savings of €3,207 for digital inhalers. Using a 10-year intervention duration and time horizon resulted incost savings of €26,309 for digital inhalers. In the first year, add-on biologic therapies accounted for 69% of the total costs in the usual care group, and for 49% in the digital inhaler group. Scenario analyses indicated consistent cost savings ranging from €2,287 (introduction biosimilars) to €4,581 (increased control, decreased exacerbations).CONCLUSION: In patients with difficult-to-treat asthma, digital inhaler based interventions can be cost-saving on the long-term by optimizing medication adherence and inhaler technique and reducing add-on biologic prescriptions.</p

Long-term cost-effectiveness of digital inhaler adherence technologies in difficult-to-treat asthma

BACKGROUND: Digital inhalers can monitor inhaler usage, support difficult-to-treat asthma management and inform step-up treatment decisions yet their economic value is unknown, hampering wide-scale implementation.OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of digital inhaler-based medication adherence management in difficult-to-treat asthma.METHODS: A model-based cost-utility analysis was performed. The Markov model structure was determined by biological and clinical understanding of asthma and was further informed by guideline-based assessment of model development. Internal and external validation was performed using the AdViSHE tool. The INCA Sun randomized clinical trial data were incorporated into the model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of digital inhalers. Several long-term clinical case scenarios were assessed (reduced number of exacerbations, increased asthma control, introduction of biosimilars [25% price-cut on biologics]).RESULTS: The long-term modelled cost-effectiveness based on a societal perspective indicated 1-year per-patient costs for digital inhalers and usual care (i.e., regular inhalers) of €7,546 and €10,752, respectively, reflecting cost savings of €3,207 for digital inhalers. Using a 10-year intervention duration and time horizon resulted incost savings of €26,309 for digital inhalers. In the first year, add-on biologic therapies accounted for 69% of the total costs in the usual care group, and for 49% in the digital inhaler group. Scenario analyses indicated consistent cost savings ranging from €2,287 (introduction biosimilars) to €4,581 (increased control, decreased exacerbations).CONCLUSION: In patients with difficult-to-treat asthma, digital inhaler based interventions can be cost-saving on the long-term by optimizing medication adherence and inhaler technique and reducing add-on biologic prescriptions.</p

Long-term cost-effectiveness of digital inhaler adherence technologies in difficult-to-treat asthma

BACKGROUND: Digital inhalers can monitor inhaler usage, support difficult-to-treat asthma management and inform step-up treatment decisions yet their economic value is unknown, hampering wide-scale implementation.OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of digital inhaler-based medication adherence management in difficult-to-treat asthma.METHODS: A model-based cost-utility analysis was performed. The Markov model structure was determined by biological and clinical understanding of asthma and was further informed by guideline-based assessment of model development. Internal and external validation was performed using the AdViSHE tool. The INCA Sun randomized clinical trial data were incorporated into the model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of digital inhalers. Several long-term clinical case scenarios were assessed (reduced number of exacerbations, increased asthma control, introduction of biosimilars [25% price-cut on biologics]).RESULTS: The long-term modelled cost-effectiveness based on a societal perspective indicated 1-year per-patient costs for digital inhalers and usual care (i.e., regular inhalers) of €7,546 and €10,752, respectively, reflecting cost savings of €3,207 for digital inhalers. Using a 10-year intervention duration and time horizon resulted incost savings of €26,309 for digital inhalers. In the first year, add-on biologic therapies accounted for 69% of the total costs in the usual care group, and for 49% in the digital inhaler group. Scenario analyses indicated consistent cost savings ranging from €2,287 (introduction biosimilars) to €4,581 (increased control, decreased exacerbations).CONCLUSION: In patients with difficult-to-treat asthma, digital inhaler based interventions can be cost-saving on the long-term by optimizing medication adherence and inhaler technique and reducing add-on biologic prescriptions.</p

Electronic monitoring with a digital smart spacer to support personalized inhaler use education in patients with asthma:The randomized controlled OUTERSPACE trial

BACKGROUND: Poor adherence to inhaled medication has been associated with poor outcomes. Smart spacers can monitor inhaler use and technique, yet their feasibility in adults with asthma and their potential benefits are unknown.OBJECTIVE: Assessing the feasibility of undertaking a definitive randomized controlled trial (RCT) of smart spacer-based inhaler education and explore potential clinical benefits in adults with asthma.METHODS: Two-month randomized controlled feasibility OUtcomes following Tailored Education and Retraining: Studying Performance and AdherenCE (OUTERSPACE) trial comparing personalized smart spacer-based inhaler education versus usual care. Patients were recruited in four Dutch primary care centres. Outcomes were feasibility (inclusion speed, patient acceptance), medication adherence, inhaler technique, clinical effects (lung function, ACQ, FeNO) and usability (System Usability Scale [SUS]).RESULTS: 42 patients were randomized and all completed the study. The feasibility of performing a larger trial focusing on asthma patient education using a smart spacer was demonstrated with all patients included in four months and a participation rate of 86%. In the intervention group, inhalation errors per day decreased by 26.2% while in the usual care group inhalation errors increased by 14.6% (p = 0.021). Adherence decreased slightly in the intervention group as opposed to improvement in the control group (difference 12%, p = 0.028). No changes in lung function, ACQ or FeNO were observed. Usability was deemed high (SUS patients 71, nurses 89).CONCLUSION: This RCT showed that smart spacer-driven education in patients with asthma is feasible and in this short-term study reduced inhaler errors. Longer-term and larger studies are required to assess clinical effects.</p