Long and Short-term Metformin Consumption as a Potential Therapy to Prevent Complications of COVID-19

Purpose: The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of metformin in complication improvement of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Methods: This was a randomized clinical trial that involved 189 patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection. Patients in the intervention group received metformin-500 mg twice daily. Patients who received metformin before admission were excluded from the control group. Patients who were discharged before taking at least 2000 mg of metformin were excluded from the study. Primary outcomes were vital signs, need for ICU admission, need for intubation, and mortality. Results: Data showed that patients with diabetes with previous metformin in their regimen had lower percentages of ICU admission and death in comparison with patients without diabetes (11.3% vs. 26.1% (P=0.014) and 4.9% vs. 23.9% (P≤0.001), respectively). Admission time characteristics were the same for both groups except for diabetes and hyperlipidemia, which were significantly different between the two groups. Observations of naproxen consumption on endpoints, duration of hospitalization, and the levels of spO2 did not show any significant differences between the intervention and the control group. The adjusted OR for intubation in the intervention group versus the control group was 0.21 [95% CI, 0.04-0.99 (P=0.047)]. Conclusion: In this trial, metformin consumption had no effect on mortality and ICU admission rates in non-diabetic patients. However, metformin improved COVID-19 complications in diabetic patients who had been receiving metformin prior to COVID-19 infection, and it significantly lowered the intubation rates

Stent-assistant versus non-stent-assistant coiling for ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Background: Several different endovascular and non-invasive treatment methods are suggested for the various types of intracranial aneurysms including simple, balloon-assisted, and stent-assisted coiling (SAC). Previous studies investigated the safety and efficacy of SAC versus non-stent-assisted coiling (non-SAC) but the results were controversial. We aim to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of SAC with non-SAC technique in stratifying by the ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched in April 2022 for studies investigated the efficacy and safety of SAC versus non-SAC. Results: Overall, 26 studies entered into our qualitative and quantitative synthesis. We found that there was overall lower recurrence rate in SAC versus non-SAC significant (RR: 0.43, 95%CI: 0.33, 0.53). Furthermore, the comparisons were significant in unruptured (RR: 0.63, 95%CI: 0.40, 0.86), ruptured (RR: 0.29, 95%CI), and combination aneurysms (RR: 0.42, 95%CI: 0.30, 0.54). Also, we found higher risk of intraprocedural rupture for SAC versus non-SAC in unruptured aneurysms (RR: 1.40, 95%CI: 1.31, 1.50). Investigating hemorrhagic events risk showed that there was significant difference in ruptured (RR: 1.73, 95%CI: 1.12, 2.34) and combination aneurysms (RR: 0.60, 95%CI: 0.37, 0.82). There was no significant difference in immediate occlusion rate, complete occlusion, and risk of ischemic events in our analysis. Conclusion: Overall, our findings demonstrated that SAC may have higher efficacy in term of recurrence rate, but also may have a higher risk of complications in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. As there are several factors affecting the outcomes and safety of these interventions, further RCTs controlled for multiple factors are required better guide the neurointerventionists choose the best strategy

Neuroimaging alterations associated with medication use in early-onset bipolar disorder: An updated review

Background: Pediatric bipolar disorder (PBD) is a severe disorder characterized by mood fluctuations starting at a young age. Several neuroimaging studies revealed a specific biological signature of PBD involving alterations in the amygdala and prefrontal regions. Considering the growing concerns regarding the effects of PBD treatments on developing brains, this review aims to provide an overview of the studies investigating the effect of mood stabilizers, antipsychotics, and anticonvulsants on neuroimaging findings in PBD.Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify all structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) studies exploring the effects of medications on neuroimaging findings in PBD. A total of 18 studies met our inclusion criteria (fMRI n = 11, sMRI n = 6, DTI n = 1).Results: Although the findings varied highly across the studies, some investigations consistently indicated that medications primarily affect the prefrontal cortex and the amygdala. Moreover, despite some exceptions, the reported medication effects predominantly lean towards structural and functional normalization. Limitations: The reviewed studies differ in methods, medications, and fMRI paradigms. Furthermore, most studies used observational approaches with small sample sizes, minimizing the statistical power.Conclusions: Evidence suggests the potential of antipsychotics and mood stabilizers to modulate the neuroimaging findings in PBD patients, mostly normalizing brain structure and function in key mood-regulating regions