Barriers and outcomes of an evidence-based approach to diagnosis and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Australia: a qualitative study

Background. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is commonly managed in primary care but there is poor awareness of evidence-based guidelines and the quality and interpretation of spirometry is suboptimal. Objectives. The aims of this qualitative study were to explore how an intervention involving case finding and management of COPD was implemented, and the extent to which the GPs and practice nurses (PNs) worked in partnership to diagnose and manage COPD. Methods. Semi-structured interviews with PNs (n = 7), GPs (n = 4) and patients (n = 26) who had participated in the Primary care EarLy Intervention for Copd mANagement (PELICAN) study. The Theoretical Domains Framework was used to guide the coding and analysis of the interviews with PN and GPs. The patient interviews were analysed thematically. Results. PNs developed technical skills and understood the requirements for good-quality spirometry. However, many lacked confidence in its interpretation and felt this was not part of their professional role. This was reflected in responses from the GPs. Once COPD was diagnosed, the GPs tended to manage the patients with the PNs less involved. This was in contrast with PNs’ active role in managing patients with other chronic diseases such as diabetes. The extent to which the GPs and PNs worked in partnership to manage COPD varied. Conclusions. PNs improved their skills and confidence in performing spirometry. Beliefs about their professional role, identity and confidence influenced the extent to which PNs were involved in interpretation of the spirometry results and managing the patient in partnership with the GP

A pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial of early intervention for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by practice nurse-general practitioner teams : Study Protocol

Background: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a leading cause of disability, hospitalization, and premature mortality. General practice is well placed to diagnose and manage COPD, but there is a significant gap between evidence and current practice, with a low level of awareness and implementation of clinical practice guidelines. Under-diagnosis of COPD is a world-wide problem, limiting the benefit that could potentially be achieved through early intervention strategies such as smoking cessation, dietary advice, and exercise. General practice is moving towards more structured chronic disease management, and the increasing involvement of practice nurses in delivering chronic care. Design: A pragmatic cluster randomised trial will test the hypothesis that intervention by a practice nurse-general practitioner (GP) team leads to improved health-related quality of life and greater adherence with clinical practice guidelines for patients with newly-diagnosed COPD, compared with usual care. Forty general practices in greater metropolitan Sydney Australia will be recruited to identify patients at risk of COPD and invite them to attend a case finding appointment. Practices will be randomised to deliver either practice nurse-GP partnership care, or usual care, to patients newly-diagnosed with COPD. The active intervention will involve the practice nurse and GP working in partnership with the patient in developing and implementing a care plan involving (as appropriate), smoking cessation, immunisation, pulmonary rehabilitation, medication review, assessment and correction of inhaler technique, nutritional advice, management of psycho-social issues, patient education, and management of co-morbidities. The primary outcome measure is health-related quality of life, assessed with the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire 12 months after diagnosis. Secondary outcome measures include validated disease-specific and general health related quality of life measures, smoking and immunisation status, medications, inhaler technique, and lung function. Outcomes will be assessed by project officers blinded to patients’ randomization groups. Discussion: This study will use proven case-finding methods to identify patients with undiagnosed COPD in general practice, where improved care has the potential for substantial benefit in health and healthcare utilization. The study provides the capacity to trial a new model of team-based assessment and management of newly diagnosed COPD in Australian primary care

Determining the role and responsibilities of the Australian epilepsy nurse in the management of epilepsy: a study protocol

Introduction Epilepsy is a common neurological condition affecting between 3% and 3.5% of the Australian population at some point in their lifetime. The effective management of chronic and complex conditions such as epilepsy requires person-centred and coordinated care across sectors, from primary to tertiary healthcare. Internationally, epilepsy nurse specialists are frequently identified as playing a vital role in improving the integration of epilepsy care and enhancing patient self-management. This workforce has not been the focus of research in Australia to date. Methods and analysis This multistage mixed-method study examines the role and responsibilities of epilepsy nurses, particularly in primary and community care settings, across Australia, including through the provision of a nurse helpline service. A nationwide sample of 30 epilepsy nurses will be purposively recruited via advertisements distributed by epilepsy organisations and through word-of-mouth snowball sampling. Two stages (1 and 3) consist of a demographic questionnaire and semistructured interviews (individual or group) with epilepsy nurse participants, with the thematic data analysis from this work informing the areas for focus in stage 3. Stage 2 comprises of a retrospective descriptive analysis of phone call data from Epilepsy Action Australia’s National Epilepsy Line service to identify types of users, their needs and reasons for using the service, and to characterise the range of activities undertaken by the nurse call takers. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval for this study was granted by Macquarie University (HREC: 52020668117612). Findings of the study will be published through peer-reviewed journal articles and summary reports to key stakeholders, and disseminated through public forums and academic conference presentations. Study findings will also be communicated to people living with epilepsy and families

Determining the role and responsibilities of the community epilepsy nurse in the management of epilepsy

Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study is to enhance the understanding of the core elements and influencing factors on the community‐based epilepsy nurse's role and responsibilities. Background: Internationally, epilepsy nurse specialists play a key role in providing person‐centred care and management of epilepsy but there is a gap in understanding of their role in the community. Design: A national three‐stage, mixed‐method study was conducted. Methods: One‐on‐one, in‐depth semi‐structured qualitative interviews were conducted online with 12 community‐based epilepsy nurses (Stage 1); retrospective analysis of data collected from the National Epilepsy Line, a nurse‐led community helpline (Stage 2); and focus group conducted with four epilepsy nurses, to delve further into emerging findings (Stage 3). A thematic analysis was conducted in Stages 1 and 3, and a descriptive statistical analysis of Stage 2 data. Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative studies checklist was followed for reporting. Results: Three key themes emerged: (1) The epilepsy nurse career trajectory highlighted a lack of standardised qualifications, competencies, and career opportunities. (2) The key components of the epilepsy nurse role explored role diversity, responsibilities, and models of practice in the management of living with epilepsy, and experiences navigating complex fragmented systems and practices. (3) Shifting work practices detailed the adapting work practices, impacted by changing service demands, including COVID‐19 pandemic experiences, role boundaries, funding, and resource availability. Conclusion: Community epilepsy nurses play a pivotal role in providing holistic, person‐centred epilepsy management They contribute to identifying and addressing service gaps through innovating and implementing change in service design and delivery. Relevance to Clinical Practice: Epilepsy nurses' person‐centred approach to epilepsy management is influenced by the limited investment in epilepsy‐specific integrated care initiatives, and their perceived value is impacted by the lack of national standardisation of their role and scope of practice. No Patient or Public Contribution: Only epilepsy nurses' perspectives were sought

Cardiovascular absolute risk assessment and management Engagement and outcomes in general practice patients

Despite a decline in recent decades, cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the major cause of death and disability in Australia.1,2 To improve primary prevention of CVD, many clinical guidelines recommend using cardiovascular absolute risk (CVAR) assessment to guide risk factor management.3-6 Cardiovascular absolute risk assessment predicts the overall risk of a cardiovascular event over a given time period (usually 5 or 10 years). However, use of CVAR is limited and has not been incorporated well in routine general practice.7-9 There has been little research on CVAR implementation and an effective implementation strategy has been lacking.1

Cardiovascular absolute risk assessment and impact on prescribing in general practice

Cardiovascular absolute risk (CVAR) assessment involves a multifactorial approach to determine a person’s numerical risk of experiencing a cardiovascular event in a given time period. Using this approach allows treatment, including pharmacological therapy, to be targeted to those at highest risk. CVAR assessment is widely recommended by guidelines, but to date its use has shown only modest improvement in prescribing for high risk patients. This thesis aimed to investigate what impact CVAR assessment had on prescribing of cardiovascular medications in Australian general practice, and to understand how general practitioners (GPs) utilised CVAR assessment.The thesis involved two phases. The first phase was a pilot study that utilised a before and after study design evaluating a CVAR assessment intervention. The second phase used a mixed methods approach, involving a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) with an embedded qualitative component. The RCT tested a complex intervention incorporating GP training, CVAR assessment of patients and practice support. The qualitative component involved interviews with GPs and patients.The pilot study recruited six GPs and 54 patients and found minimal impact of the intervention on GP prescribing. The RCT, involving 36 GPs and 1074 patients, showed no significant difference between groups in the prescription of antihypertensive and/or lipid-lowering medications. Regression analysis indicated that GPs based prescribing on targets for blood pressure and lipids rather than CVAR scores. This suggested single risk factors were still influential in determining management decisions. Imputation analysis of patients on medications at baseline indicated the potential for CVAR assessment to reduce prescribing among low risk patients, although this seldom occurred.The interviews confirmed that, for most GPs, utilising CVAR assessment did not influence their decision making about prescribing. They did, however, find it useful to educate and motivate patients. For a minority, the process was valuable for prescribing decisions, but overall the intervention was insufficient to significantly change existing approaches to CV risk management. These findings helped explain the outcomes of the RCT as well as identifying issues that impeded the adoption of CVAR assessment. This thesis demonstrated the difficulty in shifting GPs to a CVAR approach for pharmacological decision making

Prerequisites for implementing cardiovascular absolute risk assessment in general practice: a qualitative study of Australian general practitioners\u27 and patients\u27 viewsjep

Background Although recommended in clinical practice guidelines, cardiovascular absolute risk (CVAR) assessment is still used infrequently in Australian general practice. One reason is the lack of an implementation strategy. Given the lack of published reports on the implementation of CVAR worldwide, the aim of this study was to explore the views of general practitioners (GPs) and patients on prerequisites for successfully implementing CVAR assessment in general practice. Methods Multiple data involving GPs and patients were collected using focus groups (FGs) in three divisions of General Practice in Sydney between 2005 and 2006. Both GPs\u27 and patients\u27 opinions were analysed using thematic analysis. Results Twenty-two GPs participated in three GP FGs and 26 patients in three patient FGs. Many GPs thought that an initial cardiovascular risk screening could start from 40 years old while some patients thought it should start even younger. Targeting patients with known risk factors was supported by most GPs although some also stressed the importance of reaching those of unknown risk. For new patients or patients presenting for other problems, another visit for CVAR risk assessment and discussion was preferred by most GPs. A strong GP-patient relationship, common ground on priorities between GPs and their patients, patient awareness of cardiovascular risk and motivation were seen as important by both GPs and patients to the implementation of CVAR assessment. Conclusions Addressing the appropriate selection of patients and time for implementing CVAR assessment requires a consideration of multiple factors. GPs see it as a process that may need to be staged over more than one consultation and requiring appropriate strategies. 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd