11 research outputs found

    The proposed role of ultrasound in the management of giant cell arteritis in routine clinical practice

    No full text
    Objective To develop and explore a protocol for using colour duplex sonography (CDS) in the routine care of GCA. Methods We tested CDS of temporal arteries and axillary arteries (AXs) on consecutive patients with suspected or established GCA, between July 2014 and September 2016. Results We assessed 293 patients [age 72 (10), female/male 196/97], of whom 118 had clinically confirmed GCA. Seventy-three percent of patients had already received high-dose glucocorticoids (GCs) for 17 (33) days. Among new referrals with Conclusion CDS provides high positive predictive value for diagnosing GCA and allows for a significant reduction in temporal artery biopsies. We explored the role of CDS in detecting flares and demonstrated a relationship to the extent of the distribution of halos, but not to their size.</p

    THU0296 The role of ultrasound in the management of giant cell arteritis (GCA) in routine clinical practice

    No full text
    Objective To develop and explore a protocol for using colour duplex sonography (CDS) in the routine care of GCA. Methods We tested CDS of temporal arteries and axillary arteries (AXs) on consecutive patients with suspected or established GCA, between July 2014 and September 2016. Results We assessed 293 patients [age 72 (10), female/male 196/97], of whom 118 had clinically confirmed GCA. Seventy-three percent of patients had already received high-dose glucocorticoids (GCs) for 17 (33) days. Among new referrals with Conclusion CDS provides high positive predictive value for diagnosing GCA and allows for a significant reduction in temporal artery biopsies. We explored the role of CDS in detecting flares and demonstrated a relationship to the extent of the distribution of halos, but not to their size.</p

    Influence of methodological and patient factors on serum NMDAR IgG antibody detection in psychotic disorders: a meta-analysis of cross-sectional and case-control studies

    No full text
    Background: Antibodies targeting the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) have been detected in patients with psychosis. However, studies measuring the IgG subclass in serum have provided variable estimates of prevalence, and it is unclear whether these antibodies are more common in patients than controls. Because these inconsistencies could be due to methodological approaches and patient characteristics, we aimed to investigate the effect of these factors on heterogeneity. Methods: We searched Web of Science and Ovid (MEDLINE and PsycINFO) for cross-sectional and case-control studies published between Jan 1, 2000, and May 5, 2019, that reported NMDAR IgG antibody seropositivity in patients with psychosis. Pooled proportions and odds ratios (ORs) were derived using random-effects models. We estimated between-study variance (τ 2) and the proportion of observed variance due to heterogeneity ( I 2). We then used univariable random-effects meta-regression analysis to investigate the effect of study factors on heterogeneity of proportions and ORs. Our protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42018099874). Findings: Of 1276 articles in the initial search, 28 studies were eligible for inclusion, including 14 cross-sectional studies and 14 case-control studies. In cross-sectional studies, NMDAR IgG antibodies were detected in 0·73% (95% CI 0·09–1·38; I 2 56%; p=0·026) of patients with psychosis, and in case-control studies, patients with psychosis were not significantly more likely to be seropositive than healthy individuals (OR 1·57, 95% CI 0·78–3·16; I 2 15%; p=0·20). Meta-regression analyses indicated that heterogeneity was significantly associated with assay type across both study designs, illness stage in cross-sectional studies, and study quality in case-control studies. Compared with studies using a fixed cell-based assay, cross-sectional and case-control studies using the live method yielded higher pooled prevalence estimates (0·36% [95% CI –0·23 to 0·95] vs 2·97% [0·70 to 5·25]) and higher ORs (0·65 [0·33 to 1·29] vs 4·43 [1·73 to 11·36]). In cross-sectional studies, the prevalence was higher in exclusively first-episode samples than in multi-episode or mixed samples (2·18% [0·25 to 4·12] vs 0·16% [–0·31 to 0·63]), and in case-control studies, higher ORs were reported in low-quality studies than in high-quality studies (3·80 [1·47 to 9·83] vs 0·72 [0·36 to 1·42]). Interpretation: Higher estimates of NMDAR IgG antibody prevalence have been obtained with the live cell-based assay, and studies using this method find that seropositivity is more common in patients with psychosis than in controls. The effects of illness stage and study quality on heterogeneity were not consistent across study designs, and we provide clear recommendations for clinicians and researchers regarding interpreting these findings.</p
    corecore