Managing caries:the need to close the gap between the evidence base and current practice

Underpinned by a changing knowledge of the aetiology of caries and its sequelae, and assisted by established and advancing dental materials, there is growing evidence supporting less invasive management of dental caries based on the principles of minimal intervention dentistry. This narrative review assesses both the evidence and the adoption of less invasive caries management strategies and describes ways in which the gap between evidence and practice might be overcome. While there is increasing data supporting less invasive management of carious lesions, these are not standard in most dental practices worldwide. Usually, clinical studies focused on efficacy as outcome, and did not take into consideration the views and priorities of other stakeholders, such as primary care dentists, educators, patients and those financing services. Involving these stakeholders into study design and demonstrating the broader advantages of new management strategies might improve translation of research into practice. In theory, clinical dentists can rely on a growing evidence in cariology regarding less invasive management options. In practice, further factors seem to impede adoption of these strategies. Future research should address these factors by involving major stakeholders and investigating their prioritised outcomes to narrow or close the evidence gap.</p

How to Bridge Research Results to Everyday Clinical Care?

SUMMARYLaboratory and clinical studies are essential to the advancement of sciences. However, a significant gap exists between the research findings and clinical practice. Therefore, research findings can be of little importance if their outcome cannot be directly or indirectly applied to everyday clinical care or readily translated. This paper focuses on how we can shorten the gap between the generation of new knowledge and their implementation into everyday clinical care. A new model is discussed where clinicians are the ones generating the research idea are paired with researchers. They collaborate on studies whose results are readily applicable to everyday practice. Partnering with health providers on studies that address everyday clinical research questions is a potential solution to speed up the translation of the research findings. Generating clinically applicable results can better improve the health of the public. Quoting Dr. Lawrence W. Green: “If we want more evidence-based practice, we need more practice-based evidence.” This paper presents the practice-based research model as a solution to address this knowledge gap.</jats:p

Teaching students the repair of resin-based composite restorations: A survey of North American Dental Schools

Background. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether North American dental schools teach students to repair resin-based composite or RBC restorations and to compare the findings with those from similar European surveys. Materials and Methods. The authors mailed a 15-item questionnaire to 64 dental schools in the United States, Canada and Puerto Rico. The survey asked whether the school taught repair of RBC restorations and inquired about the respondents experience with such procedures. Questions also elicited reasons why schools taught or did not teach repair information in regard to relevant decision-making processes, criteria for deciding whether to perform repairs and the nature of the instruction (theoretical, practical preclinical or clinical). Results. Fifty-two (81-percent) of 64 schools participated in the survey. Thirty seven (71 percent) of the respondents reported that they taught undergraduate students repair techniques as an alternative to replacing failing RBC restorations. Twenty-seven (73 percent) of these 37 schools reported that such teaching was at the clinical level, while only three schools (8 percent) reported that it was included in formal lectures as part of preclinical courses. The major reasons given for teaching students how to repair RBC restorations were tooth structure preservation and reduction of potentially harmful effects on the pulp. Indications included the correction of marginal defect and marginal discoloration. Conclusions. More than one-half of the respondents reported that they taught repair of RBC restorations and that patients were willing to accept such treatment. Most schools considered the repair of RBC restorations to be a definitive measure and reported that on average, they expected a repaired RBC restoration to have a longevity of four years

A cohort investigation of the changes in vocational dental practitioners' views on repairing defective direct composite restorations

Objective: To investigate changes in vocational dental practitioners (VDPs) views on repairing direct composite restorations (DCRs) during the vocational training (VT) year 2002-2003. Design: A questionnaire-based cohort study. Method: Data on the repair of DCRs, including indications and details of operative techniques were collected by a questionnaire sent at the beginning of the VT year (September 2002) to all 12 Postgraduate Dental Deans in England. A follow-up questionnaire was sent to the Deans near the end of the VT year (May 2003). They were asked, on both occasions, to distribute the questionnaires among their VDPs and to return the completed questionnaires. Results: Ten deaneries participated in the study. The September 2002 and May 2003 findings (306 respondents [66%] and 313 respondents [67%] respectively) were analysed using Chi-square statistic and t-test to identify any significant differences (

Causes of the Evidence-practice Gap and Its Association with the Effects of Minimal Intervention Dentistry Education to Clinicians

SUMMARY Objectives To identify causes of the evidence-practice gap (EPG) in dentistry in Japan and analyze whether these causes are associated with: (a) improvement of EPG in minimal intervention dentistry (MID) following an educational intervention and (b) specific dentist characteristics. Methods We conducted a mixed-methods questionnaire survey among 197 Japanese dentists that integrated both quantitative and qualitative data. Causative factors for the EPG identified in the quantitative survey were clarified by qualitative analysis. We measured the EPG in a baseline survey using an EPG measurement tool based on MID. To examine how feedback using the latest scientific evidence affected change in the EPG, we measured the EPG again immediately after feedback was provided to participating dentists. Results Qualitative analysis classified all dentists into one of four “EPG cause” groups, namely “evidence-”, “dentist-”, “patient-”, and “health insurance system-related” causes. Quantitative analysis confirmed that improvement in the EPG following the feedback intervention was indeed associated with group classification. The highest concordance was found for the “evidence-related” group while the lowest concordance was in the “dentist-related” group (p=0.004). Concordance improved after evidence feedback in all groups but was lowest in the “dentist-related” group. More dentists reported practice busyness in the “dentist-related” group. Conclusions In this study, we identified four groups of causes of EPG among Japanese dentists. The degree of concordance between evidence and clinical practice was the lowest in the “dentist-related” group, and the results of this study are expected to provide useful information for the development of intervention methods for closing the EPG in the future. </jats:sec