Mesenchymal Stromal Cell-Derived Factors Promote Tissue Repair in a Small-for-Size Ischemic Liver Model but Do Not Protect against Early Effects of Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury

Loss of liver mass and ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) are major contributors to postresectional liver failure and small-for-size syndrome. Mesenchymal stromal cell-(MSC-) secreted factors are described to stimulate regeneration after partial hepatectomy. This study investigates if liver-derived MSC-secreted factors also promote liver regeneration after resection in the presence of IRI. C57BL/6 mice underwent IRI of 70% of their liver mass, alone or combined with 50% partial hepatectomy (PH). Mice were treated with MSC-conditioned medium (MSC-CM) or unconditioned medium (UM) and sacrificed after 6 or 24 hours (IRI group) or after 48 hours (IRI + PH group). Blood and liver tissue were analyzed for tissue injury, hepatocyte proliferation, and gene expression. In the IRI alone model, serum ALT and AST levels, hepatic tissue damage, and inflammatory cytokine gene expression showed no significant differences between both treatment groups. In the IRI + PH model, significant reduction in hepatic tissue damage as well as a significant increase in hepatocyte proliferation was observed after MSC-CM treatment. Conclusion. Mesenchymal stromal cell-derived factors promote tissue regeneration of small-for-size livers exposed to ischemic conditions but do not protect against early ischemia and reperfusion injury itself. MSC-derived factors therefore represent a promising treatment strategy for small-for-size syndrome and postresectional liver failure

The Effectiveness of Manual Therapy, Physiotherapy, and Treatment by the General-Practitioner for Nonspecific Back and Neck Complaints - A Randomized Clinical-Trial

In a randomized trial, the effectiveness of manual therapy, physiotherapy, continued treatment by the general practitioner, and placebo therapy (detuned ultrasound and detuned short-wave diathermy) were compared for patients (n = 256) with nonspecific back and neck complaints lasting for at least 6 weeks. The principle outcome measures were severity of the main complaint, global perceived effect, pain, and functional status. These are presented for 3, 6, and 12 weeks follow-up. Both physiotherapy and manual therapy decreased the severity of complaints more and had a higher global perceived effect compared to continued treatment by the general practitioner. Differences in effectiveness between physiotherapy and manual therapy could not be shown. A substantial part of the effect of manual therapy and physiotherapy appeared to be due to nonspecific (placebo) effects

Significant impact of recurrent respiratory tract infections in children with Down syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Parents and health professionals believe that recurrent respiratory tract infections (RRTI) have a large impact on children with Down syndrome (DS). We studied the relation between parent-reported RRTI and development, behaviour and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in 8-year-old children with DS. METHOD: During a 3-year period, 325 children with DS were recruited for inclusion in this observational study. Parents were asked to fill in the Child Behavior Checklist and TNO-AZL Children's Quality of Life Parent Form. A psychological assistant administrated the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities. The children were divided into a group with presence of RRTI (RRTI (+) ) and a group without RRTI (RRTI (-) ), on the basis of parental report. Linear regression analyses were performed to assess the effect of RRTI, while correcting for the influence of confounders. RESULTS: Compared with RRTI (-) children (n = 176), RRTI (+) children (n = 149, 46%) showed decreased mental and motor development (mean developmental age 3.67 vs. 4.08 years), more behavioural problems and lower scores on most HRQoL scales (P < 0.05). Moreover, school enrolment is less favourable in RRTI (+) children. CONCLUSION: In 8-year-olds with DS, the children with parent-reported RRTI show more delayed development, more behavioural problems and lower HRQoL compared with the children without RRTI. Although this association does not prove a causal relationship, further studies should focus on this, because RRTI are potentially preventable

A Randomized Clinical-Trial of Manual Therapy and Physiotherapy for Persistent Back and Neck Complaints - Subgroup Analysis and Relationship Between Outcome Measures

Objective: To study the efficacy of manual therapy and physiotherapy in subgroups of patients with persistent back and neck complaints. The second objective was to determine the correlation between three important outcome measures used in this trial. Design: Randomized clinical trial (subgroup analysis). Setting: Primary health care in the Netherlands. Patients: Two hundred fifty-six patients with nonspecific back and neck complaints of at least 6 wk duration who had not received physiotherapy or manual therapy in the past 2 yr. Interventions: At the discretion of the manual therapists, physiotherapists and general practitioners. Physiotherapy consisted of exercises, massage and physical therapy (heat, electrotherapy, ultrasound, shortwave diathermy). Manual therapy consisted of manipulation and mobilization of the spine. Treatment by the general practitioner consisted of drugs (e.g., analgesics), advice about posture, home exercises and (bed)rest. Placebo treatment consisted of detuned shortwave diathermy (10 min) and detuned ultrasound (10 min). Main Outcome Measures: Changes in severity of the main complaint and limitation of physical functioning measured on 10- point scales by a blinded research assistant and global perceived effect measured on a 6-point scale by the patients. Results: Improvement in the main complaint was larger with manual therapy (4.3) than with physiotherapy (2.5) for patients with chronic conditions (duration complaint of 1 yr or longer). Also, improvement in the main complaint was larger with manual therapy (5.5) than with physiotherapy (4.0) for patients younger than 40 yr (both were measured after 12-mo follow-up). Labeling of patients by the treating manual therapists as 'suitable' or 'not suitable' for treatment with manual therapy did not predict differences in outcomes. Generally, there was a moderate to strong correlation between the three outcome measures, although a considerable number of patients gave a relatively low score for perceived benefit, while the research assistant gave a high improvement score for the main complaint and physical functioning. Conclusions: The subgroup analysis suggests better results of manual therapy compared to physiotherapy in chronic patients (duration of present complaints of 1 yr or longer) and in patients younger than 40 yr old). Differences for other subgroups were less clear. The explorative findings of these subgroup analyses have to be investigated in future research

Commotio cordis

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The most frequently cited prevalence for serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS) is 1 in every 3000 people screened, but this value is debated. Additionally, changes in 2010 in the World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria for SPS might affect reported prevalence. An updated estimate of SPS prevalence is necessary to predict the number of cases in screening programs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases up to February 2014. Studies reporting the prevalence of SPS, as defined by WHO criteria, in screening populations were selected. Results : Six studies reported prevalence of SPS in screening populations, varying from 0 to 0.66 %. The highest prevalences (0.34 % and 0.66 %) were seen in studies from screening programs with patients pre-selected by fecal blood test. Primary colonoscopy-based screening programs, that have the lowest risk of bias, reported SPS prevalences ranging from 0 to 0.09 %. Across studies, 56 patients were diagnosed with SPS of whom 3 presented with synchronous colorectal cancer at index endoscopy. CONCLUSION: The true prevalence of SPS is unclear because of the risk of bias across studies, but is likely to be below 0.09 % as derived from primary colonoscopy screening programs. The prevalence in pre-selected screening populations after positive fecal testing is higher, with reported values of 0.34 % and 0.66 %. Large and high quality primary colonoscopy screening studies, reporting SPS prevalence in adequately described populations, are necessary for better estimation of the true prevalence of SPS in average-risk patients