106 research outputs found
Observational constraints on inhomogeneous cosmological models without dark energy
It has been proposed that the observed dark energy can be explained away by
the effect of large-scale nonlinear inhomogeneities. In the present paper we
discuss how observations constrain cosmological models featuring large voids.
We start by considering Copernican models, in which the observer is not
occupying a special position and homogeneity is preserved on a very large
scale. We show how these models, at least in their current realizations, are
constrained to give small, but perhaps not negligible in certain contexts,
corrections to the cosmological observables. We then examine non-Copernican
models, in which the observer is close to the center of a very large void.
These models can give large corrections to the observables which mimic an
accelerated FLRW model. We carefully discuss the main observables and tests
able to exclude them.Comment: 27 pages, 7 figures; invited contribution to CQG special issue
"Inhomogeneous Cosmological Models and Averaging in Cosmology". Replaced to
match the improved version accepted for publication. Appendix B and
references adde
How does the cosmic large-scale structure bias the Hubble diagram?
The Hubble diagram is one of the cornerstones of observational cosmology. It
is usually analysed assuming that, on average, the underlying relation between
magnitude and redshift matches the prediction of a
Friedmann-Lema\^itre-Robertson-Walker model. However, the inhomogeneity of the
Universe generically biases these observables, mainly due to peculiar
velocities and gravitational lensing, in a way that depends on the notion of
average used in theoretical calculations. In this article, we carefully derive
the notion of average which corresponds to the observation of the Hubble
diagram. We then calculate its bias at second-order in cosmological
perturbations, and estimate the consequences on the inference of cosmological
parameters, for various current and future surveys. We find that this bias
deeply affects direct estimations of the evolution of the dark-energy equation
of state. However, errors in the standard inference of cosmological parameters
remain smaller than observational uncertainties, even though they reach percent
level on some parameters; they reduce to sub-percent level if an optimal
distance indicator is used.Comment: 19+7 pages, 10 figures, v2 accepted by JCAP; minor changes to improve
clarit
- …