Constant flux relation for diffusion-limited cluster-cluster aggregation

In a nonequilibrium system, a constant flux relation (CFR) expresses the fact that a constant flux of a conserved quantity exactly determines the scaling of the particular correlation function linked to the flux of that conserved quantity. This is true regardless of whether mean-field theory is applicable or not. We focus on cluster-cluster aggregation and discuss the consequences of mass conservation for the steady state of aggregation models with a monomer source in the diffusion-limited regime. We derive the CFR for the flux-carrying correlation function for binary aggregation with a general scale-invariant kernel and show that this exponent is unique. It is independent of both the dimension and of the details of the spatial transport mechanism, a property which is very atypical in the diffusion-limited regime. We then discuss in detail the "locality criterion" which must be satisfied in order for the CFR scaling to be realizable. Locality may be checked explicitly for the mean-field Smoluchowski equation. We show that if it is satisfied at the mean-field level, it remains true over some finite range as one perturbatively decreases the dimension of the system below the critical dimension, d(c)=2, entering the fluctuation-dominated regime. We turn to numerical simulations to verify locality for a range of systems in one dimension which are, presumably, beyond the perturbative regime. Finally, we illustrate how the CFR scaling may break down as a result of a violation of locality or as a result of finite size effects and discuss the extent to which the results apply to higher order aggregation processes

Preventing Unraveling in Social Networks Gets Harder

The behavior of users in social networks is often observed to be affected by the actions of their friends. Bhawalkar et al. \cite{bhawalkar-icalp} introduced a formal mathematical model for user engagement in social networks where each individual derives a benefit proportional to the number of its friends which are engaged. Given a threshold degree $k$ the equilibrium for this model is a maximal subgraph whose minimum degree is $\geq k$. However the dropping out of individuals with degrees less than $k$ might lead to a cascading effect of iterated withdrawals such that the size of equilibrium subgraph becomes very small. To overcome this some special vertices called "anchors" are introduced: these vertices need not have large degree. Bhawalkar et al. \cite{bhawalkar-icalp} considered the \textsc{Anchored $k$-Core} problem: Given a graph $G$ and integers $b, k$ and $p$ do there exist a set of vertices $B\subseteq H\subseteq V(G)$ such that $|B|\leq b, |H|\geq p$ and every vertex $v\in H\setminus B$ has degree at least $k$ is the induced subgraph $G[H]$. They showed that the problem is NP-hard for $k\geq 2$ and gave some inapproximability and fixed-parameter intractability results. In this paper we give improved hardness results for this problem. In particular we show that the \textsc{Anchored $k$-Core} problem is W[1]-hard parameterized by $p$, even for $k=3$. This improves the result of Bhawalkar et al. \cite{bhawalkar-icalp} (who show W[2]-hardness parameterized by $b$) as our parameter is always bigger since $p\geq b$. Then we answer a question of Bhawalkar et al. \cite{bhawalkar-icalp} by showing that the \textsc{Anchored $k$-Core} problem remains NP-hard on planar graphs for all $k\geq 3$, even if the maximum degree of the graph is $k+2$. Finally we show that the problem is FPT on planar graphs parameterized by $b$ for all $k\geq 7$.Comment: To appear in AAAI 201