83 research outputs found

    Cell biological markers in breast tumors: applications in cyto- and histopathology

    Get PDF

    Cell biological markers in breast tumors: applications in cyto- and histopathology

    Get PDF

    Cell Biological Markers in Breast Tumours: Applications in cyto- and histopathology

    Get PDF
    Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumour among women in the western world, affecting 8-12 % of the female population. In the Netherlands, breast cancer occurs yearly in IOOO per IOO,OOO women with an absolute incidence of 9,000 new cases per year. The etiology is multifactorial. Age is an important risk factor. The incidence climbs after age 30, followed by a slight dip at menopause and continues to ri se during postmenopausal years. Honnonal influences are weil documented etiological factors: increasing age of the mother at birth of her first child increases the risk of breast cancer whereas late menarche and early menopause decreases the risk. An extensive collaborative study reanalysing 54 epidemiological studies in 25 countries provided evidence for a small increase in the relative risk (1.24) of having breast cancer while taking oral contraceptives and in the IO years after quitting, with no increased risk IO or more years af ter stopping

    The clinical significance of androgen receptors in breast cancer and their relation to histological and cell biological parameters

    Get PDF
    To analyse the clinical significance of the presence of androgen receptors (AR) in breast carcinomas, clinical and histological parameters of 153 primary breast carcinomas (median follow-up 46 months) were examined. Oestrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) levels were determined in cytosol preparations using enzyme immunoassay assays and in cryostat sections by immunohistochemistry. AR and Ki-67 levels were only determined immunohistochemically. Data were analysed by uni- and multivariate models. 94/153 (61%) breast carcinomas were ER+ PR+ AR+, while 14 cases were only positive for AR. All grade III tumours (n = 17) were steroid receptor negative and 14 (76%) of these cases demonstrated high Ki-67 values suggestive of more aggressive behaviour. Strikingly, 14 ductal carcinomas negative for ER and PR were positive for AR. In univariate analysis, AR as well as ER, tumour size, lymph node status, grade and Ki-67 proved to be significant prognostic factors for disease free survival (DFS). Multivariate analysis, however, showed lymph node status, tumour size and ER status to be the only independent prognostic factors for DFS within this model. We conclude that simple histological and cell biological parameters, including AR, can be used to select high- and low-risk patients at the time of primary surgery and can provide valuable information on treatment options

    CAG and GGC repeat polymorphisms in the androgen receptor gene and breast cancer susceptibility in BRCA1/2 carriers and non-carriers

    Get PDF
    Variation in the penetrance estimates for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations carriers suggests that other genetic polymorphisms may modify the cancer risk in carriers. A previous study has suggested that BRCA1 carriers with longer lengths of the CAG repeat in the androgen receptor (AR) gene are at increased risk of breast cancer (BC). We genotyped 188 BRCA1/2 carriers (122 affected and 66 unaffected with breast cancer), 158 of them of Ashkenazi origin, 166 BC cases without BRCA1/2 mutations and 156 Ashkenazi control individuals aged over 56 for the AR CAG and GGC repeats. In carriers, risk analyses were conducted using a variant of the log-rank test, assuming two sets of risk estimates in carriers: penetrance estimates based on the Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium (BCLC) studies of multiple case families, and lower estimates as suggested by population-based studies. We found no association of the CAG and GGC repeats with BC risk in either BRCA1/2 carriers or in the general population. Assuming BRCA1/2 penetrance estimates appropriate to the Ashkenazi population, the estimated RR per repeat adjusted for ethnic group (Ashkenazi and non-Ashkenazi) was 1.05 (95%CI 0.97–1.17) for BC and 1.00 (95%CI 0.83–1.20) for ovarian cancer (OC) for CAG repeats and 0.96 (95%CI 0.80–1.15) and 0.90 (95%CI 0.60–1.22) respectively for GGC repeats. The corresponding RR estimates for the unselected case–control series were 1.00 (95%CI 0.91–1.10) for the CAG and 1.05 (95%CI 0.90–1.22) for the GGC repeats. The estimated relative risk of BC in carriers associated with ≥28 CAG repeats was 1.08 (95%CI 0.45–2.61). Furthermore, no significant association was found if attention was restricted to the Ashkenazi carriers, or only to BRCA1 or BRCA2 carriers. We conclude that, in contrast to previous observations, if there is any effect of the AR repeat length on BRCA1 penetrance, it is likely to be weak. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.co
    • …
    corecore