A comparison of five paediatric dosing guidelines for antibiotics

Objective: To compare dosing guidance in the paediatric formularies of high- and middle-income countries for 32 commonly prescribed antibiotics on the World Health Organization's (WHO's) 2017 Model list of essential medicines for children. / Methods: We identified paediatric antibiotic guidelines that were either widely used internationally or originated from countries in which antibiotic use has increased markedly in recent years (i.e. Brazil, China, India, the Russian Federation and South Africa). / Findings: The study analysis considered five leading antibiotic guidelines: (i) the Manual of childhood infections: the blue book; (ii) the BNF (British national formulary) for children; (iii) the Red book®: 2018-2021 report of the committee on infectious diseases; (iv) WHO's Pocket book of hospital care for children; and (v) Indian National treatment guidelines for antimicrobial use in infectious diseases. There was marked heterogeneity in the recommended dosing (i.e. daily dose, age dosing bands and dose frequency) for most commonly used antibiotics. The rationale for dosing recommendations was generally unclear. / Conclusion: The pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and clinical evidence supporting paediatric antibiotic dosing, particularly on total doses and on age or weight dosing bands, needs to be improved. Future research should consider whether the variations in guidance identified stem from different clinical disease patterns, varying levels of antibiotic resistance or drug availability rather than historical preferences. Interested global parties could collaborate with WHO's Model list of essential medicines antibiotic working group to develop an evidence-based consensus and identify research priorities

Applicability of routine targeted next-generation sequencing to estimate Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

It remains unclear whether targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) conveys a reliable estimate of tumor mutational burden (TMB). We sequenced 79 archival samples of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) recipients (57% lung cancer, 43% melanoma) using Ion Ampliseq Cancer Hotspot Panel. Employing multiple cutoff values, we verified that TMB by tNGS did not correlate with response or survival following ICPI. We found enrichment of ATM mutations in ICPI-refractory tumors (P=0.01) to correlate with worse survival (4.2 vs. 10 mo, P=0.03). Limited-coverage tNGS delivers an imprecise estimate of patients' TMB but may aid identification of candidate somatic variants of predictive/prognostic significance

Association of prior antibiotic treatment with survival and response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with cancer

Importance: Gut dysbiosis impairs response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and can be caused by broad-spectrum antibiotic (ATB) therapy. Objective: To evaluate whether there is an association between ATB therapy administered concurrently (cATB) or prior (pATB) to ICI therapy and overall survival (OS) and treatment response to ICI therapy in patients with cancer treated with ICIs in routine clinical practice. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, multicenter, cohort study conducted at 2 tertiary academic referral centers recruited 196 patients with cancer who received ICI therapy between January 1, 2015, and April 1, 2018, in routine clinical practice rather than clinical trials. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival calculated from the time of ICI therapy commencement and radiologic response to ICI treatment defined using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1), with disease refractory to ICI therapy defined as progressive disease 6 to 8 weeks after the first ICI dose without evidence of pseudoprogression. Results: Among 196 patients (137 men and 59 women; median [range] age, 68 [27-93] years) with non-small cell lung cancer (n = 119), melanoma (n = 38), and other tumor types (n = 39), pATB therapy (HR, 7.4; 95% CI, 4.3-12.8; P <.001), but not cATB therapy (HR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.5-1.4; P =.76), was associated with worse OS (2 vs 26 months for pATB therapy vs no pATB therapy, respectively) (hazard ratio [HR], 7.4; 95% CI, 4.2-12.9) and a higher likelihood of primary disease refractory to ICI therapy (21 of 26 [81%] vs 66 of 151 [44%], P <.001). Overall survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (2.5 vs 26 months, P <.001), melanoma (3.9 vs 14 months, P <.001), and other tumor types (1.1 vs 11, P <.001) was consistently worse in those who received pATBs vs those who did not. Multivariate analyses confirmed that pATB therapy (HR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.9-6.1; P <.001) and response to ICI therapy (HR, 8.2; 95% CI, 4.0-16.9; P <.001) were associated with OS independent of tumor site, disease burden, and performance status. Conclusions and Relevance: Despite being limited by sample size, geographic origin, and the lack of correlative analyses on patients' gut microbiota, this study suggests that pATB therapy but not cATB therapy is associated with a worse treatment response and OS in unselected patients treated with ICIs in routine clinical practice. Mechanistic studies are urgently required to investigate ATB-mediated alterations of gut microbiota as a determinant of poorer outcome following ICI treatment