19 research outputs found

    Policy-Driven Industrial Ecosystems

    Get PDF
    The purpose of this research is the development of theory on how industrial ecosystems can be driven by policy and government interventions, especially when motivated by the pursuit of “technological sovereignty” as political objective. Theoretical foundation of the research forms a literature review, which summarizes the existing prior research on how inter-organisational relationships, with ecosystems at its core, are affected by policy measures and government interventions. “Technological sovereignty” is introduced as concept, and the role of network constructs at the inter-organisational level as the driving force behind value co-creation developments is explored. There are industrial network activities between companies identified, such as ecosystems, value chains and platforms, which can be supported and promoted by policy initiatives in the areas of industrial, innovation and technology policy. Such approaches potentially increase a country’s technological sovereignty and might ultimately lead to greater prosperity

    Tech Sovereignty and Industrial Ecosystems

    Get PDF
    Theories of ecosystems in economic or business research are rarely considered from a perspective, in which these network constructs of inter-organisational relationships are influenced by policy initiatives and instruments – not just individual efforts of actors from within the ecosystem. In the geoeconomic context, the concept of “technological sovereignty” has been proposed as a framework for innovation policy, which could be a legitimate political objective if higher prosperity can be achieved. The research combines conceptual and empirical research on “policy-driven industrial ecosystems” that are embedded in such a competitive geoeconomic environment. A central thesis was developed from the synthesis of either concepts, suggesting that industrial ecosystems can be driven by policy and government interventions in a polity to achieve greater technological sovereignty. The dissertation topic thus aims to fill a research gap at the intersection of the fields strategic management, public policy, and international relations

    Coopetition For The Greater Good. Exploratory study of coopetition management mechanisms in the pharmaceutical industry

    Get PDF
    The pharmaceutical industry has experienced a remarkable surge in "coopetition," wherein rival companies join forces to pursue shared objectives, leading to a dynamic business environment fraught with tensions resulting from the coexistence of strong, contradictory forces of competition and cooperation. Despite its growing importance, research examining coopetition implementation and management, especially considering contextual influences shaping its dynamics, remains limited. This study aims to fill this gap by exploring the mechanisms of coopetition implementation and management in the pharmaceutical industry, focusing on the interrelation of different elements of coopetition execution and the contextual environment. Adopting an interpretivist philosophy and a qualitative, exploratory approach, this research engaged with industry insiders to explore how large, global pharmaceutical companies effectively manage dyadic coopetition. Key findings highlight the significance of the formation stage in mitigating tensions throughout the coopetition lifecycle. The operationalization stage emphasizes emotional and analytical capabilities across organizational levels, in addition to the balancing capability manifested through various coopetition management principles identified in the literature: separation, integration, arbitration, and a novel variant of co-management principles, alongside a unique approach - unilateral control, all complemented by supportive organizational adaptations. Moreover, diplomacy and learning capabilities were identified as crucial components of coopetition capabilities. The termination stage brings persisting tensions due to legal pressures and competitive vigilance. The research also brings to light the complex interplay between legal and regulatory institutional pressures and coopetition dualities. The research complements and contributes to coopetition management literature by proposing a multi-level, multi-stage view of tensions. It offers a nuanced understanding of how these tensions are navigated throughout the drug development cycle and highlights the importance of addressing the often-overlooked termination stage of coopetition. Furthermore, it highlights the complex relationship between institutional pressures and dualities. Overall, the study provides valuable insights into the nuanced mechanisms employed by large pharmaceutical companies to holistically manage and maintain balanced coopetition. Keywords: coopetition, pharmaceutical, management, execution, coopetition capability, regulated industries, legal pressures, coopetition lifecycle

    Entrepreneurial Ecosystems as an Enabler of Technological Sovereignty: The Case of the Indian Short Form Video Market

    Get PDF
    This paper examines whether the geopolitical objective of technological sovereignty is attainable and enabled by entrepreneurial ecosystems, as both concepts aim to improve economic competitiveness. A qualitative single-case study of the Indian short-form video (SFV) market, which provides some of the most innovative business-to-consumer (B2C) digital applications, was conducted based on 20 stakeholder interviews and triangulated archival data. Numerous SFV start-ups were created in the city of Bangalore after a geopolitical incident that prompted the Indian government to ban comparable Chinese SFV apps, including TikTok. The research empirically demonstrates that the Bangalore entrepreneurial ecosystem facilitated technological sovereignty in three steps based on an input-process-output (IPO) model to enable the creation of these “sovereign” Indian SFV apps. Core of the theoretical enablement process is the adaptability of an entrepreneurial ecosystem to socio-political disruptions induced by geopolitical and geoeconomic objectives. This allows for ecosystem self-sustainment and triggers technological sovereignty as ecosystem response
    corecore