2 research outputs found
Molecular characterization of Brucella spp. from seropositive herds of cattle farmed at the wildlife-livestock-human interface in Rwanda
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT : The original contributions presented in the study are
included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries
can be directed to the corresponding author.Seroprevalence studies showed that brucellosis is prevalent in cattle in Rwanda with no recent study on the characterization of Brucella spp. Therefore, this study aimed to characterize Brucella spp. in seropositive herds of cattle farmed at the wildlife–livestock–human interface. Whole blood samples (n = 118), milk (n = 41), and vaginal swabs (n = 51) were collected from 64 seropositive herds. All samples (n = 210) were inoculated onto modified Centro de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agroalimentaria (CITA) selective medium. Cultures were analyzed to detect Brucella spp. using 16S−23S ribosomal DNA interspacer region (ITS) PCR, the Brucella cultures were speciated using AMOS and Bruce-ladder PCR assays. Brucella spp. were detected in 16.7% (35/210) of the samples established from the samples using ITS-PCR. The AMOS PCR assay identified mixed Brucella abortus and B. melitensis (n = 6), B. abortus (n = 7), and B. melitensis (n = 1) from cultures from blood samples; mixed B. abortus and B. melitensis (n = 1) and B. abortus (n = 4) from cultures from milk samples; mixed B. abortus and B. melitensis (n = 6), B. abortus (n = 8), and B. melitensis (n = 1) from cultures from vaginal swabs. Bruce-ladder PCR assay confirmed B. abortus and B. melitensis cultures. The isolation of Brucella spp. was significantly associated with districts, with the Nyagatare district having more isolates than other districts (p=0.01). This study identified single ormixed B. abortus and B. melitensis infections in cattle samples in Rwanda, which emphasizes the need to improve brucellosis control at the wildlife–livestock– human interface and raise the awareness of cattle keepers, abattoir workers, laboratory personnel, and consumers of cattle products.The Belgian Directorate- General for Development Cooperation, through its Framework Agreement with the Institute of Tropical Medicine.https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/veterinary-scienceam2023Veterinary Tropical Disease
Seroprevalence and associated risk factors of bovine brucellosis at the wildlife-livestock-human interface in Rwanda
Bovine brucellosis is endemic in Rwanda; however, little information is available on
seroprevalence and risk factors. Therefore, a cross-sectional study was conducted among cattle
farmed at the wildlife-livestock-human interface (n = 1691) in five districts and one peri-urban district
(n = 216). Cattle were screened using the Rose Bengal test, then the results were confirmed by indirect
enzyme-linked immunesorbent assay. Potential risk factors were determined with a questionnaire
and analyzed for their association with seropositivity. In all districts, the animal and herd-level
seroprevalence was 7.4% (141/1907) and 28.9% (61/212), respectively, 8.3% (141/1691) and 30.9%
(61/198) at the interface, and 0.0% (0/216) in peri-urban areas. Among the potential risk factors, old
age (≥5 years), cattle farmed close to wildlife, herds of cattle and small ruminants, history of abortions,
and replacement animals were significantly associated with brucellosis (p < 0.05). Low awareness of
zoonotic brucellosis, assisting calving without biosafety protection, drinking raw milk, and manual
milking were each observed in more than 21.7% of cattle keepers whose herds were seropositive.
This study confirmed brucellosis endemicity in cattle farmed close to wildlife in Rwanda, suggesting
the need to focus control efforts in these areas. Educated farmers with a high awareness of zoonotic
brucellosis had low bovine brucellosis seropositivity, which emphasizes the importance of education.Supplementary Materials: Table S1: Univariate associations of potential risk factors with herd-level seropositivity of Brucella spp. in cattle
sampled at the wildlife-livestock-human interface in Rwanda. A questionnaire used to collect herd and public
health risk factors. Excel document containing all data on individual seroprevalence and potential risk factors.Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp, Belgiumhttp://www.mdpi.com/journal/microorganismspm2020Veterinary Tropical Disease