Constitutional Law - State\u27s Interest in Wild Animals

North Carolina wildlife management programs should feel the impact of Hughes v. Oklahoma. The basis of North Carolina\u27s wildlife regulations and caselaw is state ownership. Since Hughes overrules Geer v. Connecticut, North Carolina - to be addressed in the conclusion - will need to follow a new theory espousing more federal involvement in state wildlife programs

Constitutional Law - State\u27s Interest in Wild Animals

North Carolina wildlife management programs should feel the impact of Hughes v. Oklahoma. The basis of North Carolina\u27s wildlife regulations and caselaw is state ownership. Since Hughes overrules Geer v. Connecticut, North Carolina - to be addressed in the conclusion - will need to follow a new theory espousing more federal involvement in state wildlife programs