A new method for measuring torsional deformity in scoliosis

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The importance of spinal rotational and torsional deformity in the etiology and the management of scoliosis are well-recognized. For measuring the posterior spinal component rotation, Ho's method was reported to be reliable. However, there is no practical method to measure the anterior spinal component rotation. Moreover, there is also no method to quantify the spinal torsional deformity in scoliosis. The goal of this study is to characterize scoliosis and its deformity to hypothesize the etiology and the development of scoliosis, and to establish a new method for the measurement of the vertebral body rotation and spinal torsional deformity in scoliosis using CT scans.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Pre-operative CT scans of 25 non-congenital scoliosis patients were recruited and the apical vertebral rotation was measured by a newly developed method and Ho's method. Ho's method adopts the laminae as the rotational landmark. For a new method to measure the apical vertebral rotation, the posterior point just beneath each pedicle was used as a landmark. For quantifying the spinal torsional deformity angle, the rotational angle difference between the two methods was calculated.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Intraobserver and interobserver reliability analyses showed both methods to be reliable. Apical vertebral rotation revealed 13.9 ± 6.8 (mean ± standard deviation) degrees by the new method and 7.9 ± 6.3 by Ho's method. Right spinal rotation was assigned a positive value. The discrepancy of rotation (6.1 ± 3.9 degrees), meaning that the anterior component rotated more than the posterior component, was considered to express the spinal torsional deformity to the convex side.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>We have developed an easy, reliable and practical method to measure the rotation of the spinal anterior component using a CT scan. Furthermore, we quantified the spinal torsional deformity to the convex side in scoliosis by comparing the rotation between the anterior and posterior components.</p

Anterior prominence of the femoral condyle varies among prosthesis designs and surgical techniques in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: Patellofemoral overstuffing after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can cause limited range of motion and anterior knee pain. This study compared anterior prominence of femoral components among different prothesis designs in surgical simulation models utilizing the anterior reference (AR) and posterior reference (PR) techniques. METHODS: Surgical simulations were performed using on a three-dimensional planning system preoperative computed tomography data of consecutive 30 patients with knee osteoarthritis scheduled to undergo TKA. Four implant models were used: Attune, Persona, Journey II, and Legion. Rotational alignment was set parallel to the transepicondylar axis and size was selected based on the absence of notch formation in the femoral anterior cortex and the best fit with the shape of the medial posterior femoral condyle. For each combination of surgical technique (AR or PR method) and implant model, measurements were taken of the maximum medial, central, and lateral prominence of the implant from the anterior femoral cortex. RESULTS: Using either the AR or PR method, the medial and central prominences were significantly lower with Journey II than with the other models. The lateral prominence was the lowest with Attune in the AR method. The AR method was associated with significantly less prominence compared with the PR method, regardless of implant model. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of anterior prominence of the femoral implant is affected by the implant design when the AR method is used. The PR method is associated with greater anterior prominence compared with the AR method, and the pitch size is an additional factor in the PR method. Surgeons should be familiar with implant designs, including the thickness of the anterior flange and the available size selections

Open‐wedge high tibial osteotomy with a slight valgus correction from neutral limb alignment achieves clinical improvements comparable with those for knees with varus deformity

Abstract Purpose The effect of open‐wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) on the preoperative neutral alignment of the knee is unknown. The purpose of this study was to clarify the clinical outcome of OWHTO with neutral alignment, defined as within 4 degrees of varus. Methods This retrospective study included 72 knees with varus that underwent medial OWHTO. The knees were divided according to the preoperative hip‐knee‐ankle angle into a neutral alignment group (≤ 4° of varus alignment) and a varus alignment group (> 4° of varus alignment). The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Forgotten Joint Score‐12 (FJS‐12) were evaluated preoperatively and during at least 2 years of follow‐up postoperatively. Results There were no significant differences between the preoperative FJS‐12 (17.9 versus 23.7; p = 0.16) and postoperative FJS‐12 (57.3 versus 60.6; p = 0.52) or KOOS subscale scores (p > 0.05) in the neutral alignment group or the varus alignment group. Each group had a mean change in the KOOS subscale scores that exceeded the minimum clinically important difference. Conclusion The short‐term clinical results of OWHTO for neutral alignment were as favourable as those for varus malalignment. Level of evidence IV

No difference in the incidence or location of deep venous thrombosis according to use of pharmacological prophylaxis following total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: The incidence and characteristics of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without pharmacologic prophylaxis have not been fully investigated. This study aimed to determine whether there are any differences in the incidence, location, and characteristics of DVT following TKA with pharmacologic prophylaxis and without pharmacologic prophylaxis. METHODS: A total of 156 knees were retrospectively evaluated for DVT following TKA by duplex ultrasound on postoperative day 7, after excluding 60 knees from 216 consecutive knees because of antiplatelet or anticoagulant use before surgery, history of venous thromboembolism, or bleeding risk. The 156 knees included in the analysis were divided into two groups: with pharmacologic prophylaxis (n = 79) and without pharmacologic prophylaxis (n = 77). RESULTS: The overall incidence of DVT was 34% (54/156 knees). DVT was detected in 31.6% of knees with pharmacologic prophylaxis and in 37.6% of knees without pharmacologic prophylaxis; the difference was not statistically significant. Soleal vein thrombus was observed in 74.6% of the knees with DVT and non-floating thrombus was observed in 98.7%. There were no obvious between-group differences in thrombus characteristics such as compressibility, echogenicity, mean vein diameter, and whether the thrombus was attached to the vein wall or free-floating. CONCLUSIONS: No differences were found in the incidence, location, or characteristics of DVT following TKA with or without pharmacological prophylaxis