35 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
NUREG (Series) 0712/supp.1
From introduction: This report is a safety evaluation report on the application for operating licenses for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 (San Onofre 2 and 3 or the facility). This report was prepared by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff (the NRC staff or the staff), and summarizes the results of our radiological safety review of the facility
Recommended from our members
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report NUREG-0491
From introduction: This Safety Evaluation Report summarizes the results of the technical evaluation of the proposed RESAR-414 design performed by the NRC staff, and delineates the scope of the technical matters considered in evaluating the radiological safety aspects of the RESAR-414 design. Environmental aspects were not considered in our review of RESAR-414, but will be addressed in each utility application for a construction permit which references RESAR-414
Recommended from our members
Radioactive Effluents from Nuclear Power Plants Annual Report
This report describes radioactive effluents from commercial nuclear power plants (NPPs) in the United States. This information was reported by the licensees for radioactive discharges that occurred in 2007. The report provides information relevant to the potential impact of NPPs on the environment and on public health
Recommended from our members
Radioactive Effluents from Nuclear Power Plants Annual Report
This report describes radioactive effluents from commercial nuclear power plants (NPPs) in the United States. This information was reported by the licensees for radioactive discharges that occurred in 2008. The report provides information relevant to the potential impact of NPPs on the environment and on public health
Recommended from our members
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report NUREG-0084
The proposed project: Pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act, as amended, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's regulations in Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, an application with an accompanying Environmental Report, was filed by Northeast Utilities (hereinafter referred to as the applicant) for construction permits for two generating units designated as the Montague Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 (Docket Nos. 50-496 and 50-497), each of which is powered by a boiling water reactor (BWR) and is designed for initial operation at approximately 3579 megawatts thermal (MWt) with a net electrical output of 1150 megawatts electric (MWe). A safety design rating of 3759 (MWt) has been used in assessing the impact in this report. Condenser cooling will be accomplished through the use of natural-draft cooling towers. Makeup water for the cooling towers will be obtained from the Connecticut River, and the tower discharge (blowdown) will be returned to the Connecticut River. The proposed facilities will be located on the 1900-acre Montague Plain in the Town of Montague, Franklin County, in northwestern Massachusetts about 1.8 miles east of the Connecticut River and about 3.5 miles east-southeast of the Town of Greenfield, Massachusetts, the largest community within 10 miles with a population of about 15,000. Integration of the power from the Montague Nuclear Power Station will be accomplished by individual routes for each unit, requiring the construction of approximately 118 miles of 345-kV circuit transmission lines into existing electrical systems. A 345-kV switchyard will be located on the Montague site in proximity to the generating units and will constitute the terminus of the 345-kV circuits over which the output of the station will be delivered to the load centers. The route for Unit 1 will terminate at the Ludlow, Massachusetts, substation, and the route for Unit 2 will terminate at the Frost Bridge, Connecticut, substation
Environmental standard review plans for the environmental review of construction permit applications for nuclear power plants.
May 1979."NUREG-0555."Includes bibliographical references.Mode of access: Internet
Final environmental statement related to steam generator repair at Turkey Point Plant Units 3 and 4, Docket nos. 50-250 and 50-251, Florida Power and Light Company /
"NUREG-0743.""March 1981."Includes bibliographical references.Mode of access: Internet
Safety evaluation report by the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, in the matter of Duke Power Company, McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, docket nos. 50-369 and 50-370.
"NUREG-0422, March 1, 1978."Includes bibliographical references (pages C1-C6 or p. 249-254).Mode of access: Internet
Supplement no. 1 to the Safety evaluation report by the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, in the matter of New England Power Company, NEP Nuclear Generating Station, Unit nos. 1 and 2, docket nos. STN 50-568 and STN 50-569.
"NUREG-0424, Supplement no. 1, July 20, 1979."Includes bibliographical references (A-3).Mode of access: Internet
Recommended from our members
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report 0512
Abstract: A Final Environmental Statement for the Power Authority of the State of New York for the construction of the Greene County Nuclear Power Plant (Docket No. 50-549) located in Greene County, New York, has been prepared by the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This statement provides (1) a summary of environmental impact and adverse effects of the proposed facility, and (2) a consideration of principal alternatives. Also included are comments of governmental agencies and other organizations on the Draft Environmental Statement for the project and staff responses to these comments. The NRC staff has
concluded, based on a weighing of environmental, economic, technical, and other benefit against environmental costs and available alternatives, that a construction permit should be denied because the alternative sites available to the applicant are environmentally
preferable. If the permit is granted, the applicant will be required to take the necessary mitigating actions to decrease the aesthetic impact by using alternative closed cycle cooling systems and to undertake monitoring programs to identify, evaluate and mitigate construction related community and public services impacts in the immediate three-county impact area