Law as a Tool for a Sexual Revolution: Israel\u27s Prevention of Sexual Harassment Law- 1998

Discussion of the newly enacted law will outline the theoretical underpinnings and their effect on the resultant version (Part III), followed by the legislative history, including the Knesset and the public debate surrounding the bill (Part IV), and the impact of that debate on the final outcome of the law (Part V). Part VI will pay particular attention to the innovative approach of the law as a whole and some of the revolutionary specific provisions within. In particular, the legislative framework will be considered in the context of a nation founded and conducted on traditional religious tenets of Judaism. Finally, an analysis of the implementation and implication of the law will encompass sociocultural factors, feasibility, and potential impact (Part VII)

Law as a Tool for a Sexual Revolution: Israel\u27s Prevention of Sexual Harassment Law- 1998

Discussion of the newly enacted law will outline the theoretical underpinnings and their effect on the resultant version (Part III), followed by the legislative history, including the Knesset and the public debate surrounding the bill (Part IV), and the impact of that debate on the final outcome of the law (Part V). Part VI will pay particular attention to the innovative approach of the law as a whole and some of the revolutionary specific provisions within. In particular, the legislative framework will be considered in the context of a nation founded and conducted on traditional religious tenets of Judaism. Finally, an analysis of the implementation and implication of the law will encompass sociocultural factors, feasibility, and potential impact (Part VII)

Feminist Rule of Law Reform and Health Impact of Legal Systems Premised on Women as Communal Gauges of Honor

Gender equality is touted as key for sustainable development, improved public health, decreased poverty, and robust democratic systems. Yet despite growing interest by international bodies and national governments, the gendering of rule of law reform has received limited critical attention. This Article argues that transformative gendered rule of law reform requires holistic and intersectional analysis of the domestic legal landscape that genuinely accounts for lived experiences. Using Jordan as a case study, it critiques the short-sighted and perhaps harmful technical feminist law reform efforts of calling for repeal of isolated provisions related to sensational honor killings. As in many countries, Jordan\u27s legal system sends mixed messages about the state\u27s role in delineating and dismantling gender roles and stereotypes that undergird laws which both reflect and shape popular perceptions. Such laws may persist in part due to an alarming dearth of research on the immense physical, psychological, and emotional toll inherent in maintaining a social order premised on gender stereotypes-such as women\u27s actual or suspected conduct serving as proxy for family or community honor. This Article asserts that gendering reform of laws premised on gender stereotypes requires holistic analysis that includes shifting the discourse toward health impact data and collective gains and away from often unproductive campaigns perceived to condemn culture and tradition. A public health and human rights framing could provide a more neutral and disarming lens of analysis and deepen advocacy beyond sensational cases and short-term spikes in public attention toward a long-term holistic reform agenda that seeks to dismantle patterns of power and abuse fueled by legally-entrenched gender stereotypes