Eating with a smaller spoon decreases bite size, eating rate and ad libitum food intake in healthy young males

There is a paucity of data examining the effect of cutlery size on the microstructure of within-meal eating behaviour or food intake. Therefore, the present studies examined how manipulation of spoon size influenced these eating behaviour measures in lean young men. In study one, subjects ate a semi-solid porridge breakfast ad libitum, until satiation. In study two, subjects ate a standardised amount of porridge, with mean bite size and mean eating rate covertly measured by observation through a one-way mirror. Both studies involved subjects completing a familiarisation visit and two experimental visits, where they ate with a teaspoon (SMALL) or dessert spoon (LARGE), in randomised order. Subjective appetite measures (hunger, fullness, desire to eat and satisfaction) were made before and after meals. In study one, subjects ate 8 % less food when they ate with the SMALL spoon (SMALL 532 (SD 189) g; LARGE 575 (SD 227) g; P=0·006). In study two, mean bite size (SMALL 10·5 (SD 1·3) g; LARGE 13·7 (SD 2·6) g; P<0·001) and eating rate (SMALL 92 (SD 25) g/min; LARGE 108 (SD 29) g/min; P<0·001) were reduced in the SMALL condition. There were no condition or interaction effects for subjective appetite measures. These results suggest that eating with a small spoon decreases ad libitum food intake, possibly via a cascade of effects on within-meal eating microstructure. A small spoon might be a practical strategy for decreasing bite size and eating rate, likely increasing oral processing, and subsequently decreasing food intake, at least in lean young men

24 h severe energy restriction impairs post-prandial glycaemic control in young, lean males

Intermittent energy restriction (IER) involves short periods of severe energy restriction interspersed with periods of adequate energy intake, and can induce weight loss. Insulin sensitivity is impaired by short-term, complete energy restriction, but the effects of IER are not well known. In randomised order, 14 lean men (age: 25 (SD 4) y; BMI: 24 (SD 2) kg·m-2; body fat: 17 (4) %) consumed 24 h diets providing 100% (10441 (SD 812) kJ; EB) or 25% (2622 (SD 204) kJ; ER) of estimated energy requirements, followed by an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT; 75g glucose drink) overnight fasted. Plasma/ serum glucose, insulin, non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), glucose-dependant insulinotropic peptide (GIP) and fibroblast growth factor-21 (FGF21) were assessed before and after (0 h) each 24 h dietary intervention, and throughout the 2 h OGTT. Homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR) assessed the fasted response and incremental (iAUC) or total (tAUC) area under the curve were calculated during the OGTT. At 0 h, HOMA2-IR was 23% lower after ER compared to EB (P<0.05). During the OGTT, serum glucose iAUC (P<0.001) serum insulin iAUC (P<0.05) and plasma NEFA tAUC (P<0.01) were greater during ER, but GLP-1 (P=0.161), GIP (P=0.473) and FGF21 (P=0.497) tAUC were similar between trials. These results demonstrate that severe energy restriction acutely impairs postprandial glycaemic control in lean men, despite reducing HOMA2-IR. Chronic intervention studies are required to elucidate the long-term effects of IER on indices of insulin sensitivity, particularly in the absence of weight loss