Abstract 200: ICA Lesion Etiology does not affect the Outcomes after Endovascular Treatment of Acute Tandem LVO

Introduction Tandem lesions (TLs) are present in up to 15% of patients with stroke due to acute large vessel occlusions.(1) Nevertheless, published research on endovascular treatment outcomes in this population is scarce. Although TLs are most commonly of atherosclerotic etiology, some patients present with dissection of the ICA.(2, 3) In this study, we compared the clinical outcomes of TL patients with the two etiologies. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on a multicenter cohort of patients with TLs who underwent endovascular treatment. The patients were categorized into two groups according to the etiology of the ICA lesion: atherosclerosis and dissection. Patients were matched by baseline characteristics. Clinical outcomes, including recanalization success, functional independence and hemorrhagic events were assessed with multivariable analyses. Results Of 691 patients from the database, 526 met the inclusion criteria of this study. 467 (88.8%) patients presented with atherosclerosis of the ICA, and 59 (11.2%) patients presented dissection. Univariable differences were found in median age (69 y. [IQR 61 ‐ 76] vs. 52 y. [IQR 44 ‐ 63], p<.001), rates of hypertension (74.5% vs. 52.5%, p<0.001), hyperlipidemia (49.2% vs. 27.1%, p=.001), diabetes (29.8% vs. 15.3%, p=.019), and prior antiplatelets use (36.8% vs. 22.8%, p=.037). After matching and adjusting for confounders, we did not find differences between both groups for the main outcomes: Successful reperfusion (89.1% vs. 79.7%, aOR 0.46, 95% CI 0.20 – 1.08, p=.074), mRS 0‐2 at 90 days (47.5% vs. 47.4%, aOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.44 – 1.48, p=.381), and sICH (4.3% vs. 6.8%, aOR 0.96, 95% CI 0.17 – 5.58, p=0.965). Similarly, no differences were found for the secondary outcomes: Excellent recanalization (51.1% vs. 40.7%, aOR 0.86, 95% CI 0.46 – 1.60, p=.632), early neurological improvement (41% vs. 36.2%, aOR 0.76, 95% CI 0.40 – 1.43, p=.392), parenchymal hematoma type 2 (7.8% vs. 8.5%, aOR 0.59, 95% CI 0.17 – 2.03, p=.400), mortality at 90 days (17.4% vs. 14%, aOR 1.17, 95% CI 0.49 – 2.81, p=.726), and intrahospital mortality (9.6% vs. 8.6%, aOR 0.91, 95% CI 0.31 – 2.62, p=.859). Conclusion In our cohort, patients with lesions of atherosclerotic etiology achieved higher rates of successful and excellent recanalization, but the effect disappeared when matching the groups and adjusting for confounders. The results of this study show that the etiology of the ICA lesion does not affect the clinical outcomes of endovascular treatment in tandem lesions

Abstract 049: Effect of the ICA Lesion Severity in Outcomes after Endovascular Treatment of Acute Tandem LVO

Introduction Tandem Lesions (TLs) pose unique challenges in the endovascular management of acute ischemic stroke.(1) The absence of anterograde blood flow in the carotid occluded segment may limit the effectiveness of endovascular interventions, resulting in delayed reperfusion or suboptimal recanalization.(2,3) Thus, the presence of unpaired blood flow through the ICA in the context of TLs is believed to exacerbate the extension of ischemic lesions. (4,5) This study compared the clinical and procedural outcomes of patients with TLs and extracranial internal carotid artery occlusion versus those with stenosis. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on a multicenter cohort of patients with TLs who underwent endovascular treatment. The patients were categorized into two groups: those with extracranial ICA stenosis and those with occlusion. Clinical outcomes, including functional independence, hemorrhagic events, and procedural time metrics including puncture to reperfusion time were assessed. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate these differences segregating patients according to varying degrees of stenosis, and in pre‐specified subgroups. Results A total of 513 patients with TLs were included in the study. 281 (54.8%) presented with ICA occlusion, and 232 (45.2%) presented stenosis >=70% (Table 1). The comparison between the stenosis and occlusion groups revealed no significant differences in the main outcomes, including mTICI 2c‐3 (47.5% vs. 50.6%, aOR 1.07, 95% CI 0.70‐1.64, p=.751) (Figure 1), mRS 0‐2 at 90 days (43.6% vs. 48.9%, aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.52‐1.20, p=.271), sICH rates (4.7% vs. 5.6%, aOR 0.72, 95% CI 0.31‐1.71, p=.458), and puncture to reperfusion time (58 [40‐80.5] vs. 52.5 [35.2‐80], ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.88‐1.23, p=.64). Similar analyses performed comparing different degrees of stenosis and occlusion, and in patients treated with the antegrade approach only, did not show significant differences either. Conclusion Our findings indicate that although more severe degrees of stenosis or occlusion of the ICA prolong the time from puncture to reperfusion, no significant differences in clinical outcomes exist. The clinical implications of these findings need to be further evaluated to fully comprehend the specific needs of patients affected by TLs

Safety Outcomes of Antiplatelet Therapy During Endovascular Treatment of Tandem Lesions in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients

Risk of hemorrhage remains with antiplatelet medications required with carotid stenting during endovascular therapy (EVT) for tandem lesion (TLs). We evaluated the safety of antiplatelet regimens in EVT of TLs. This multicenter study included anterior circulation TL patients from 2015 to 2020, stratified by periprocedural EVT antiplatelet strategy: (1) no antiplatelets, (2) single oral, (3) dual oral, and (4) intravenous IV (in combination with single or dual oral). Primary outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Secondary outcomes were any hemorrhage, favorable functional status (mRS 0-2) at 90 days, successful reperfusion (mTICI score ≥ 2b), in-stent thrombosis, and mortality at 90 days. Of the total 691 patients, 595 were included in the final analysis. One hundred and nineteen (20%) received no antiplatelets, 134 (22.5%) received single oral, 152 (25.5%) dual oral, and 196 (31.9%) IV combination. No significant association was found for sICH (ref: no antiplatelet: 5.7%; single:4.2%; aOR 0.64, CI 0.20-2.06, p = 0.45, dual:1.9%; aOR 0.35, CI 0.09-1.43, p = 0.15, IV combination: 6.1%; aOR 1.05, CI 0.39-2.85, p = 0.92). No association was found for parenchymal or petechial hemorrhage. Odds of successful reperfusion were significantly higher with dual oral (aOR 5.85, CI 2.12-16.14, p = 0.001) and IV combination (aOR 2.35, CI 1.07-5.18, p = 0.035) compared with no antiplatelets. Odds of excellent reperfusion (mTICI 2c/3) were significantly higher for cangrelor (aOR 4.41; CI 1.2-16.28; p = 0.026). No differences were noted for mRS 0-2 at 90 days, in-stent thrombosis, and mortality rates. Administration of dual oral and IV (in combination with single or dual oral) antiplatelets during EVT was associated with significantly increased odds of successful reperfusion without an increased rate of symptomatic hemorrhage or mortality in patients with anterior circulation TLs

Abstract Number ‐ 157: Effect of Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke with Tandem Lesions

Introduction Recent studies have shown beneficial effects of Carotid artery stenting (CAS) in acute ischemic stroke patients with tandem lesions (TL). However, stent placement requires the use of antiplatelet medications to prevent in‐stent thrombosis and re‐occlusion of the artery. This must be balanced with the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage. In this multicenter study, we aimed to investigate the safety and feasibility of using antiplatelet regimens in patients with anterior circulation stroke with TLs. Methods Patient level data were pooled from 17 centers and included patients with intracranial occlusion of ICA or M1/M2 segment of MCA with a concomitant extracranial ICA occlusion or stenosis ≥ 50%. Inclusion criteria were; age ≥ 18 years, EVT for intracranial occlusion, and underwent treatment for extracranial ICA lesions demonstrated on CTA and/or DSA. Patients were divided into groups according to the number of antiplatelets administered at the time of endovascular therapy (EVT) procedure into four groups including; 1) no antiplatelets, 2) single oral antiplatelet, 3) dual antiplatelets, and 4) intravenous antiplatelets (in combination of single or dual antiplatelets). Multivariable logistic regression models with multiple imputations were built to assess the association of primary outcome; symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and secondary outcomes including; modified Rankin Score (mRS) 0–2 at 90 days, and successful reperfusion (mTICI score ≥ 2b). Results A total of 682 patients were included. Of these, 138 (20.2%) did not receive any antiplatelet therapy, while 143 (20.97%) were treated with single oral, 207 (30.35%) with dual oral, and 194 (28.5%) with intravenous combined with single or dual antiplatelets. The rate of favorable outcome was non‐significantly higher in the dual (53%) and IV‐combination (54.4%) antiplatelets, as compared with single (38.9%) and without antiplatelet (38.6%) medications. In the multivariable model, after adjusting, there was no significant differences in the sICH (single: aOR: 1.07, CI: 0.62‐1.84, p = 0.8, dual: aOR: 1.18, CI: 0.70‐1.99, p = 0.55, IV‐combination: aOR: 1.01, CI: 0.57‐1.78, p = 0.98) and functional outcome at 90 days (single: aOR: 1.15, CI: 0.63‐2.12, p = 0.64, dual: aOR: 1.03, CI: 0.55‐1.9, p = 0.9, IV‐combination: aOR: 0.83, CI: 0.42‐1.64, p = 0.59) among the study groups. Interestingly, successful reperfusion (mTICI score ≥ 2b) was significantly higher in dual oral and IV‐combination antiplatelets (single: aOR: 1.14, CI: 0.61‐2.14, p = 0.69, dual: aOR: 4.82, CI: 2.23‐10.42, p = < 0.001, IV‐combination: aOR: 3.65, CI: 1.71‐7.79, p = 0.001). Conclusions Administration of antiplatelet medications during EVT was associated with successful reperfusion without increasing the rate of symptomatic hemorrhage in patients with anterior circulation LVO with TLs. Further large‐scale randomized studies are warranted to validate the optimal antiplatelet regimens during acute carotid artery stenting in patients with TLs

Clinical and Safety Outcomes of Endovascular Therapy 6 to 24 Hours After Large Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke With Tandem Lesions

Background and PurposeEffect of endovascular therapy (EVT) in acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) patients with tandem lesions (TLs) within 6-24 hours after last known well (LKW) remains unclear. We evaluated the clinical and safety outcomes among TL-LVO patients treated within 6-24 hours. MethodsThis multicenter cohort was divided into two groups, based on LKW to puncture time: early window (<6 hours), and late window (6-24 hours). Primary clinical and safety outcomes were 90-day functional independence measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS: 0-2) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Secondary outcomes were successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2b), first-pass effect, early neurological improvement, ordinal mRS, and in-hospital and 90-day mortality. ResultsOf 579 patients (median age 68, 32.1% females), 268 (46.3%) were treated in the late window and 311 (53.7%) in the early window. Late window group had lower median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at admission, Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score, rates of intravenous thrombolysis, and higher rates for perfusion imaging. After adjusting for confounders, the odds of 90-day mRS 0-2 (47.7% vs. 45.0%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-1.02), favorable shift in mRS (aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.44-1.76), and sICH (3.7% vs. 5.2%, aOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.20-1.56) were similar in both groups. There was no difference in secondary outcomes. Increased time from LKW to puncture did not predicted the probability of 90-day mRS 0-2 (aOR 0.99, 95% CI 0.96-1.01, for each hour delay) among patients presenting <24 hours. Conclusion EVT for acute TL-LVO treated within 6-24 hours after LKW was associated with similar rates of clinical and safety outcomes, compared to patients treated within 6 hours

Anesthetic management for large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke with tandem lesions

BackgroundEndovascular therapy (EVT) stands as an established and effective intervention for acute ischemic stroke in patients harboring tandem lesions (TLs). However, the optimal anesthetic strategy for EVT in TL patients remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the impact of distinct anesthetic techniques on outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients presenting with TLs.MethodsPatient-level data, encompassing cases from 16 diverse centers, were aggregated for individuals with anterior circulation TLs treated between January 2015 and December 2020. A stratification based on anesthetic technique was conducted to distinguish between general anesthesia (GA) and procedural sedation (PS). Multivariable logistic regression models were built to discern the association between anesthetic approach and outcomes, including the favorable functional outcome defined as 90-day modified Rankin Score (mRS) of 0–2, ordinal shift in mRS, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), any hemorrhage, successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score ≥2b), excellent recanalization (mTICI 3), first pass effect (FPE), early neurological improvement (ENI), door-to-groin and recanalization times, intrahospital mortality, and 90-day mortality.ResultsAmong 691 patients from 16 centers, 595 patients (GA 38.7%, PS 61.3%) were included in the final analysis. There were no significant differences noted in the door-to-groin time (80 (46–117.5) mins vs 54 (21–100), P=0.607) and groin to recanalization time (59 (39.5–85.5) mins vs 54 (38–81), P=0.836) among the groups. The odds of a favorable functional outcome (36.6% vs 52.6%; adjusted OR (aOR) 0.56, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.84, P=0.005) and a favorable shift in the 90-day mRS (aOR 0.71, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.99, P=0.041) were lower in the GA group. No differences were noted for sICH (3.9% vs 4.7%, P=0.38), successful recanalization (89.1% vs 86.5%, P=0.13), excellent recanalization (48.5% vs 50.3%, P=0.462), FPE (53.6% vs 63.4%, P=0.05), ENI (38.9% vs 38.8%, P=0.138), and 90-day mortality (20.3% vs 16.3%, P=0.525). An interaction was noted for favorable functional outcome between the type of anesthesia and the baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) (P=0.033), degree of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis (P<0.001), and ICA stenting (P<0.001), and intraparenchymal hematoma between the type of anesthesia and intravenous thrombolysis (P=0.019). In a subgroup analysis, PS showed better functional outcomes in patients with age ≤70 years, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score <15, and acute ICA stenting.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that the preference for PS not only aligns with comparable procedural safety but is also associated with superior functional outcomes. These results prompt a re-evaluation of current anesthesia practices in EVT, urging clinicians to consider patient-specific characteristics when determining the optimal anesthetic strategy for this patient population

Functional and Safety Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting and Mechanical Thrombectomy for Large Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke With Tandem Lesions

Approximately 10% to 20% of large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes involve tandem lesions (TLs), defined as concomitant intracranial LVO and stenosis or occlusion of the cervical internal carotid artery. Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) may benefit patients with TLs; however, optimal management and procedural strategy of the cervical lesion remain unclear. To evaluate the association of carotid artery stenting (CAS) vs no stenting and medical management with functional and safety outcomes among patients with TL-LVOs. This cross-sectional study included consecutive patients with acute anterior circulation TLs admitted across 17 stroke centers in the US and Spain between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020. Data analysis was performed from August 2021 to February 2022. Inclusion criteria were age of 18 years or older, endovascular therapy for intracranial occlusion, and presence of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis (>50%) demonstrated on pre-MT computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, or digital subtraction angiography. Patients with TLs were divided into CAS vs nonstenting groups. Primary clinical and safety outcomes were 90-day functional independence measured by a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 to 2 and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), respectively. Secondary outcomes were successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2b), discharge mRS score, ordinal mRS score, and mortality at 90 days. Of 685 patients, 623 (mean [SD] age, 67 [12.2] years; 406 [65.2%] male) were included in the analysis, of whom 363 (58.4%) were in the CAS group and 260 (41.6%) were in the nonstenting group. The CAS group had a lower proportion of patients with atrial fibrillation (38 [10.6%] vs 49 [19.2%], P = .002), a higher proportion of preprocedural degree of cervical stenosis on digital subtraction angiography (90%-99%: 107 [32.2%] vs 42 [20.5%], P < .001) and atherosclerotic disease (296 [82.0%] vs 194 [74.6%], P = .003), a lower median (IQR) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (15 [10-19] vs 17 [13-21], P < .001), and similar rates of intravenous thrombolysis and stroke time metrics when compared with the nonstenting group. After adjustment for confounders, the odds of favorable functional outcome (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.67; 95% CI, 1.20-2.40; P = .007), favorable shift in mRS scores (aOR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.02-2.10; P = .04), and successful reperfusion (aOR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.02-3.60; P = .002) were significantly higher for the CAS group compared with the nonstenting group. Both groups had similar odds of sICH (aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.46-2.40; P = .87) and 90-day mortality (aOR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.50-1.20; P = .27). No heterogeneity was noted for 90-day functional outcome and sICH in prespecified subgroups. In this multicenter, international cross-sectional study, CAS of the cervical lesion during MT was associated with improvement in functional outcomes and reperfusion rates without an increased risk of sICH and mortality in patients with TLs

Abstract Number ‐ 181: Anterograde versus Retrograde approaches in the Endovascular Management of Tandem Lesions

Introduction There are two approaches for treating stroke patients with tandem occlusions: the anterograde approach (AA, extracranial lesions first) and the retrograde approach (RA, intracranial lesion first). Both techniques are associated with favorable functional outcomes. We aimed to compare both techniques for efficacy and safety outcomes in a multicenter study. Methods Patient data were pooled from 17 centers and divided into AA and RA groups. We performed multivariable logistic regressions to evaluate the association between each group with efficacy and safety outcomes. Results 552 patients were included in the study, 270 (48.4%) were treated with the AA, and 288 (51.6%) with the RA. There were no differences between groups for functional outcome (mRS 0–2) at 90 days (aOR = 0.93, 95%CI: 0.58‐1.48, p = 0.75), and successful reperfusion [mTICI >2b] (aOR = 0.83, 95%CI: 0.44‐1.56, p = 0.57). Similarly, we did not observe any differences for safety outcomes related to sICH (OR = 0.57, 95%CI: 0.25‐1.29, p = 0.18), parenchymal hematoma type 2 (OR = 0.61, 95%CI: 0.3‐1.22, p = 0.16), and all‐cause mortality at 90 days (OR = 1.22, 95%CI: 0.66‐2.26, p = 0.52). However, the median puncture‐to‐reperfusion time was higher in AA compared with RA [59 minutes (IQR: 38–92) vs 53.5 minuntes (IQR: 37–87)]. Conclusions The AA and RA approaches for the treatment of tandem occlusions seem to achieve similar efficacy and safety outcomes. These results are consistent with those of a previous multi‐center study. Additionally, and in line with previous research, there is a puncture‐to‐reperfusion time difference between both approaches, which suggests a potential benefit when using the RA. However, further prospective randomized studies are needed to elucidate its benefit in achieving better clinical outcomes

Abstract Number: LBA2 Early versus Late Window in the Endovascular Management of Acute Tandem Lesions

Introduction Despite the irrefutable benefit of mechanical thrombectomy for patients with isolated intracranial large vessel occlusions (LVO), the effect of endovascular treatment in patients with tandem lesions remains unclear. In this study from the multi‐center PICASSO registry, we compare efficacy and safety outcomes in TLs patients treated in the early versus late window. Methods In this study, we used the data from the multi‐center PICASSO (Proximal Internal Carotid Artery Acute Stroke Secondary to Tandem Occlusion Thrombectomy) registry. PICASSO collaboration is a retrospective observational registry from 17 stroke centers. We compared efficacy and safety outcomes in TLs patients treated in the early versus late window. Patients were divided into two groups depending on last known well (LKW) to puncture time: Early time‐window group (<6 hours), and late time‐window group (6‐24 hours).We performed multivariable logistic and multinomial regressions to evaluate the association between each group and efficacy and safety outcomes, Results 628 patients were included in the study. There were 336 (53.5%) treated in the early time‐window and 292 (46.5%) in the late time‐window. We did not observe a statistically significant difference between groups mRS 0–2 at 90 days (46.5% vs. 49%, aOR = 1.51, 95%CI: 0.92‐2.57, p = 0.101), shift analysis of mRS (aOR = 0.93, 95%CI: 0.63‐1.38, p = 0.734), and increased time from LKW to puncture was not significantly associated with mRS 0–2 at 90 days (aOR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.99‐1.11, p = 0.09 for each hour delay). Similarly, we did not find differences in hemorrhagic transformation of ischemic stroke types: symptomatic ICH (5.1% vs. 4.1%, aOR = 0.80, 95%CI: 0.34‐1.88, p = 0.604), parenchymal hematoma type 2 (8.1% vs. 6.9%. aOR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.44‐1.66, p = 0.641), and in ordinal analysis of petechial hemorrhage (19.8% vs 24.7%, aOR = 1.15, 95%CI: 0.79‐1.66), p = 0.466). Additionally, there were no differences in rates of successful reperfusion (mTICI 2b‐3) (88.7% vs. 85.2%, aOR = 1.19, 95%CI: 0.67‐2.11, p = 0.546), first pass effect (61.1% vs. 56.9%, aOR = 1.01, 95%CI: 0.65‐1.56, p = 0.963), early neurological improvement (44.1% vs. 36.7%, aOR = 0.96, 95%CI: 0.64‐1.44, p = 0.833), mortality at 90‐days (15.2% vs. 19.2%, aOR = 1.62, 95%CI: 0.94‐2.8, p = 0.81) and in‐hospital mortality (9.8% vs. 10.5%, aOR = 1.28, 95% CI 0.68‐2.39, p = 0.441). Conclusions The therapeutic effect of endovascular therapy in patients with AIS due to tandem lesions who present in the late time‐window is similar to those presenting in the early time‐window. Furthermore, efficacy and safety outcomes rates are consistent with those found in clinical trials that included patients with isolated intracranial lesions treated in the late time‐window