Pharmacologic versus direct-current electrical cardioversion of atrial flutter and fibrillation

Conversion of atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation (AF) can be achieved by either pharmacologic or direct-current (DC) electrical cardioversion. DC electrical cardioversion is more effective and restores sinus rhythm instantaneously; however, general anesthesia is necessary, which can cause severe complications. On the other hand, pharmacologic cardioversion is less effective. First, time to conversion is unpredictable and may be relatively long, especially with oral drug therapy. Also, the rate of conversion is lower and depends on duration of AF. In addition, safety is an important issue. Adverse drug reactions include bradycardia, paradoxical tachycardia due to enhanced atrioventricular conduction, ventricular proarrhythmia, and acute heart failure. In paroxysmal AF, drug therapy is usually aimed at an acute conversion. Class IA and IC drugs are more efficacious than the class III drugs sotalol, amiodarone, and ibutilide. By contrast, class III drugs are more effective for the conversion of atrial flutter. Acute conversion out-of-hospital ("pill in the pocket approach") should be done only if the drug used appeared effective and safe after a few in-hospital trials. In persistent AF, DC conversion is preferred because drugs are particularly ineffective if the arrhythmia has lasted >24-48 hours. The tatter probably relates to electrical and anatomical remodeling of the atria during ongoing atrial fibrillation and flutter. Nevertheless, a wait-and-see approach using, for example, oral amiodarone may be adopted with late DC conversion if the drug fails to convert persistent AF. However, the consequences of remodeling seem to dictate an early conversion. In this respect, echocardiography-guided DC cardioversion may become increasingly important in AF. It will prevent treatment resistance and potentially reduces embolic complications. In a hybrid approach, antiarrhythmic drugs may be used to enhance DC conversion and prevent (sub)acute recurrences of AF. However, it may increase the defibrillation threshold, especially if class IC drugs are used. New treatment options such as automatic defibrillation (implantable atrioverter) are still investigational. (C)1999 by Excerpta Medica, Inc

Cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in the setting of mild to moderate heart failure

We investigated the effect of electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure. The study group consisted of 24 patients with mild to moderate heart failure [13 men, mean age 67+/-7 years, mean peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2) 16.3+/-2.8 ml/min/kg] and chronic atrial fibrillation (median duration 19 (1-228) months). Patients were stable on digoxin, diuretics, nitrates and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; no prophylaxis with antiarrhythmics was started after cardioversion. Cardioversion was unsuccessful in 6 patients; of the 18 patients in whom sinus rhythm was obtained 9 had a relapse of atrial fibrillation within 6 weeks after cardioversion. The remaining 9 patients with maintenance of sinus rhythm and the 15 (6+9) patients with atrial fibrillation at follow-up after 6 weeks did not differ with respect to any baseline characteristic, including age, peak VO2, duration of atrial fibrillation, echocardiographic left ventricular and left atrial dimensions, plasma atrial natriuretic peptide and norepinephrine. In the patients with maintenance of sinus rhythm, baseline measurements were repeated at follow-up. Peak VO2 did not change significantly (16.7+/-2.8 to 17.6+/-3.3 ml/min/kg, P=0.29); also, echo parameters, atrial natriuretic peptide and norepinephrine were not significantly affected. These results indicate that it is difficult to achieve lasting sinus rhythm through electrical cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation and mild to moderate heart failure. Moreover, in patients with maintenance of sinus rhythm after cardioversion no significant benefit in terms of peak VO2, cardiac dimensions, and neurohumoral status is to be expected. Hence, indiscriminate cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in the setting of heart failure does not appear to be useful. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd

Cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in the setting of mild to moderate heart failure

We investigated the effect of electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure. The study group consisted of 24 patients with mild to moderate heart failure [13 men, mean age 67+/-7 years, mean peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2) 16.3+/-2.8 ml/min/kg] and chronic atrial fibrillation (median duration 19 (1-228) months). Patients were stable on digoxin, diuretics, nitrates and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; no prophylaxis with antiarrhythmics was started after cardioversion. Cardioversion was unsuccessful in 6 patients; of the 18 patients in whom sinus rhythm was obtained 9 had a relapse of atrial fibrillation within 6 weeks after cardioversion. The remaining 9 patients with maintenance of sinus rhythm and the 15 (6+9) patients with atrial fibrillation at follow-up after 6 weeks did not differ with respect to any baseline characteristic, including age, peak VO2, duration of atrial fibrillation, echocardiographic left ventricular and left atrial dimensions, plasma atrial natriuretic peptide and norepinephrine. In the patients with maintenance of sinus rhythm, baseline measurements were repeated at follow-up. Peak VO2 did not change significantly (16.7+/-2.8 to 17.6+/-3.3 ml/min/kg, P=0.29); also, echo parameters, atrial natriuretic peptide and norepinephrine were not significantly affected. These results indicate that it is difficult to achieve lasting sinus rhythm through electrical cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation and mild to moderate heart failure. Moreover, in patients with maintenance of sinus rhythm after cardioversion no significant benefit in terms of peak VO2, cardiac dimensions, and neurohumoral status is to be expected. Hence, indiscriminate cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in the setting of heart failure does not appear to be useful. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd

Impaired autonomic function predicts dizziness at onset of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Background: Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is associated with various symptoms, including dizziness, which presumably reflects hemodynamic deterioration. Given the importance of the autonomic nervous system in mitigating the hemodynamic effect of atrial fibrillation, we hypothesized that autonomic function would be predictive of the severity of dizziness. Methods: The study group comprised 73 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (mean age 54.1 years, 51 males). Forty-three (59%) patients had lone atrial fibrillation. Mean ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation was 99+/-16 beats/min. On average, patients had a 3-year history of one paroxysm per week lasting 2 h. Autonomic function was assessed using autonomic function tests, including noninvasive measurement of baroreflex sensitivity. Head up tilting was used to test vasovagal reactivity. Severity of dizziness at onset of atrial fibrillation was quantified by the patients using a five-point scale (1=none; 2=light; 3=mild; 4=moderate; and 5=severe). Multivariate analysis was performed to identify the independent predictors of the severity of dizziness. Results: Mean severity of dizziness was 3.36+/-1.65. Multivariate predictors of moderate-to-severe dizziness as opposed to none-to-mild dizziness were a low 30-15 ratio after standing up and low baroreflex sensitivity. Though syncope was never reported nine patients showed a full vasovagal response during head up tilting. Conclusions: It is concluded that dizziness in patients with "treated" atrial fibrillation in the setting of none to mild structural heart disease is predicted by impaired autonomic function. Vasovagal reactivity appears not to be involved in this connection. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved