Long-term survival and health-related quality of life after in-hospital cardiac arrest

Introduction: In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is an adverse event associated with high mortality. Because of the impact of IHCA more data is needed on incidence, outcomes and associated factors that are present prior to cardiac arrest. The aim was to assess one-year survival, patient-centred outcomes after IHCA and their associated pre-arrest factors.  Methods: A multicentre prospective cohort study in 25 hospitals between January 1st 2017 and May 31st 2018. Patients ≥ 18 years receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for IHCA were included. Data were collected using Utstein and COSCA-criteria, supplemented by pre-arrest Modified Rankin Scale (MRS, functional status) and morbidity through the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Main outcomes were survival, health-related quality of life (HRQoL, EuroQoL) and functional status (MRS) after one-year.  Results: A total of 713 patients were included, 64.5% was male, median age was 63 years (IQR 52–72) and 72.8% had a non-shockable rhythm, 394 (55.3%) achieved ROSC, 231 (32.4%) survived to hospital discharge and 198 (27.8%) survived one year after cardiac arrest. Higher pre-arrest MRS, age and CCI were associated with mortality. At one year, patients rated HRQoL 72/100 points on the EQ-VAS and 69.7% was functionally independent.  Conclusion: One-year survival after IHCA in this study is 27.8%, which is relatively high compared to previous studies. Survival is associated with a patient's pre-arrest functional status and morbidity. HRQoL appears acceptable, however functional rehabilitation warrants attention. These findings provide a comprehensive insight in in-hospital cardiac arrest prognosis

Communicatie over reanimatiebeleid in het ziekenhuis

Doel Goede zorg omvat dat we zorgvuldig, anticiperend en samen met de patiënt besluiten over reanimatie. Wij onderzochten hoe de communicatie over reanimatieafspraken verloopt in de Nederlandse ziekenhuizen en inventariseerden hoe patiënten het reanimatiegesprek hebben ervaren. Opzet Cross-sectioneel multicentrisch onderzoek. Methode Gestructureerde interviews over het reanimatiebeleid bij patiënten die waren opgenomen op een verpleegafdeling. Medische gegevens werden uit het elektronisch patiëntendossier (EPD) gehaald. Resultaten In 13 ziekenhuizen werden 1136 patiënten ondervraagd. Bij 63,7% was een wel-reanimerenbeleid, bij 27,5% een niet-reanimerenbeleid en bij 8,8% geen beleid vermeld in het EPD. 56% herinnerde zich een gesprek over het reanimatiebeleid en hiervan rapporteerde 81,5% hetzelfde beleid als in het EPD vermeld stond. Dit percentage was lager bij 80-plussers (77,5%) en patiënten die thuis ≥ 10 geneesmiddelen gebruikten (73,3%). Twee derde van de patiënten (66,1%) had het reanimatiegesprek als positief of neutraal ervaren. Conclusie De meeste patiënten begrijpen de reanimatieafspraken goed, maar kwetsbare patiënten, zoals ouderen en patiënten met multimorbiditeit, zijn gebaat bij een uitvoeriger gesprek. In het algemeen ervaren zij het reanimatiegesprek als positief

Between-centre differences in care for in-hospital cardiac arrest

Background: Survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest is poor, but current literature shows substantial heterogeneity in reported survival rates. This study aims to evaluate care for patients suffering in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in the Netherlands by assessing between-hospital heterogeneity in outcomes and to explain this heterogeneity stemming from differences in case-mix or differences in quality of care. Methods: A prospective multicentre study was conducted comprising 14 centres. All IHCA patients were included. The adjusted variation in structure and process indicators of quality of care and outcomes (in-hospital mortality and cerebral performance category [CPC] scale) was assessed with mixed effects regression with centre as random intercept. Variation was quantified using the median odds ratio (MOR), representing the expected odds ratio for poor outcome between two randomly picked centres. Results: After excluding centres with less than 10 inclusions (2 centres), 701 patients were included of whom, 218 (32%) survived to hospital discharge. The unadjusted and case-mix adjusted MOR for mortality was 1.19 and 1.05, respectively. The unadjusted and adjusted MOR for CPC score was 1.24 and 1.19, respectively. In hospitals where personnel received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training twice per year, 183 (64.7%) versus 290 (71.4%) patients died or were in a vegetative state, and 59 (20.8%) versus 68 (16.7%) patients showed full recovery (p < 0.001). Conclusion: In the Netherlands, survival after IHCA is relatively high and between-centre differences in outcomes are small. The existing differences in survival are mainly attributable to differences in case-mix. Variation in neurological outcome is less attributable to case-mix