4 research outputs found
Current and future options for the management of phantom-limb pain
Phantom-limb pain (PLP) belongs among difficult-to-treat chronic pain syndromes. Treatment options for PLP are to a large degree implicated by the level of understanding the mechanisms and nature of PLP. Research and clinical findings acknowledge the neuropathic nature of PLP and also suggest that both peripheral as well as central mechanisms, including neuroplastic changes in central nervous system, can contribute to PLP. Neuroimaging studies in PLP have indicated a relation between PLP and the neuroplastic changes. Further, it has been shown that the pathological neuroplastic changes could be reverted, and there is a parallel between an improvement (reversal) of the neuroplastic changes in PLP and pain relief. These findings facilitated explorations of novel neuromodulatory treatment strategies, adding to the variety of treatment approaches in PLP. Overall, available treatment options in PLP include pharmacological treatment, supportive non-pharmacological non-invasive strategies (eg, neuromodulation using transcranial magnetic stimulation, visual feedback therapy, or motor imagery; peripheral transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, physical therapy, reflexology, or various psychotherapeutic approaches), and invasive treatment strategies (eg, surgical destructive procedures, nerve blocks, or invasive neuromodulation using deep brain stimulation, motor cortex stimulation, or spinal cord stimulation). Venues of further development in PLP management include a technological and methodological improvement of existing treatment methods, an implementation of new techniques and products, and a development of new treatment approaches
Tissue Glue-Based Sealing Patch for the in vivo Prevention of Iatrogenic Prelabor Preterm Rupture of Fetal Membranes
Introduction: One of the main concerns for all fetal surgeries is the risk of preterm delivery due to the preterm prelabor rupture of the fetal membranes (iPPROM). Clinical approaches to seal fetal membrane (FM) defects are missing due to the lack of appropriate strategies to apply sealing biomaterials at the defect site.
Methods: Here, we test the performance of a previously developed strategy to seal FM defects with cyanoacrylate-based sealing patches in an ovine model up to 24 days after application. Results: Patches sealed tightly the fetoscopy-induced FM defects and remained firmly attached to the defect over 10 days. At 10 days after treatment, 100% (13/13) of the patches were attached to the FMs, and 24 days after treatment 25% (1/4) of the patches placed in CO insufflation, and 33% (1/3) in NaCl infusion remained. However, all successfully applied patches (20/24) led to a watertight sealing at 10 or 24 days after treatment. Histological analysis indicated that cyanoacrylates induced a moderate immune response and disrupted the FM epithelium.
Conclusion: Together, these data show the feasibility of minimally invasive sealing of FM defects by locally gathering tissue adhesive. Further development to combine this technology with refined tissue glues or healing-inducing materials holds great promise for future clinical translation