New Insights of Infiltration Process of Argyrodite Li6PS5Cl Solid Electrolyte into Conventional Lithium-Ion Electrodes for Solid-State Batteries

All-solid-state lithium-ion batteries based on solid electrolytes are attractive for electric applications due to their potential high energy density and safety. The sulfide solid electrolyte (e.g., argyrodite) shows a high ionic conductivity (10−3 S cm−1). There is an open question related to the sulfide electrode’s fabrication by simply infiltrating methods applied for conventional lithium-ion battery electrodes via homogeneous solid electrolyte solutions, the structure of electrolytes after drying, chemical stability of binders and electrolyte, the surface morphology of electrolyte, and the deepening of the infiltrated electrolyte into the active materials to provide better contact between the active material and electrolyte and favorable lithium ionic conduction. However, due to the high reactivity of sulfide-based solid electrolytes, unwanted side reactions between sulfide electrolytes and polar solvents may occur. In this work, we explore the chemical and electrochemical properties of the argyrodite-based film produced by infiltration mode by combining electrochemical and structural characterizations

Film processing of Li6PS5Cl electrolyte using different binders and their combinations

The development of solid electrolytes has made significant progress in the last decade. Among the most promising materials, sulfide-based electrolytes show high ionic conductivities and low densities, and their precursors are abundant. For industrially relevant battery cells, sulfide electrolytes need to be processed to form thin electrolyte sheets that are either directly applied to the electrodes as coatings or prepared as stand-alone films. Thus, processing of sulfide electrolyte powders has recently drawn much attention as it seems to be one of the major challenges in realizing sulfide-based all-solid-state batteries. In this work, six different binders (NBR, HNBR, PIB, PBMA, SBS, SEBS) were selected for preparation of electrolyte films using Li6PS5Cl as a sulfidic model compound. The influence of the binders on the electrochemical performance as well as on the mechanical properties of the resulting films was investigated. In addition, binder blends were explored as a vial approach to optimize the properties of the electrolyte films. Special focus was put on elucidating the relation between the physico-chemical properties of the binder materials and the resulting electrochemical and mechanical properties of the electrolyte films

Nucleotide Excision Repair Genes are Upregulated by Low-Dose Artificial Ultraviolet B: Evidence of a Photoprotective SOS Response?

Nucleotide excision repair is a major mechanism of defense against the carcinogenic effects of ultraviolet light. Ultraviolet B causes sunburn and DNA damage in human skin. Nucleotide excision repair has been studied extensively and described in detail at the molecular level, including identification of many nucleotide excision repair-specific proteins and the genes encoding nucleotide excision repair proteins. In this study, normal human keratinocytes were exposed to increasing doses of ultraviolet B from fluorescent sunlamps, and the effect of this exposure on expression of nucleotide excision repair genes was examined. An RNase protection assay was performed to quantify transcripts from nucleotide excision repair genes, and a slot blot DNA repair activity assay was used to assess induction of the nucleotide excision repair pathway. The activity assay demonstrated that cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers were removed efficiently after exposure to low doses of ultraviolet B, but this activity was delayed significantly at higher doses. All nucleotide excision repair genes examined demonstrated a similar trend: ultraviolet B induces expression of nucleotide excision repair genes at low doses, but downregulates expression at higher doses. In addition, we show that pre-exposure of cells to low-dose ultraviolet protected keratinocytes from apoptosis following high-dose exposure. These data support the notion that nucleotide excision repair is induced in cells exposed to low doses of ultraviolet B, which may protect damaged keratinocytes from cell death; however, exposure to high doses of ultraviolet B downregulates nucleotide excision repair genes and is associated with cell death

M004 In aortic stenosis, 2D speckle tracking differentiates left ventricular dysfunction load- to remodelling-dependant

BackgroundIn aortic stenosis, it is not known which between longitudinal, radial and circumferential contraction is influenced by loading conditions or remodelling. To test our hypothesis and to understand left ventricular function recovery, we investigated patients at early, i.e. 7 days (contractility enhancement load-dependant) and at late follow-up, i.e. 3 months (contractility enhancement remodelling-dependant) after transcutaneous aortic valve implantation (TAVI).Methods and ResultsTwenty-three subjects (AS: valve orifice < or =0.7cm2; 14 female; mean age, 84+/-6 years) were studied. All subjects of the study had conventional 2D-Doppler echocardiography and speckle tracking analysis (GE HealthCare). Speckle tracking was sampled in short-axis view for radial and circumferential strain and in apical 4, 3 and 2-chamber view for averaged longitudinal strain. Measurements were performed before, 7 days and 3 months after TAVI. Mean pressure gradient decreased from 41±20mmHg to 10±3mmHg (p<0.001) while aortic valve area increased from 0.6±0.1 to 1.7±0.2cm2 (p<0.001) after implantation. Biplane Simpson EF was 50±10 %, 51±13 and 58±11 % at baseline, 7-day and 3-month follow-up (p=0.01), respectively. Improvement of circumferential strain found 7 days after TAVI is sustained at 3 months. Radial strain increased shortly after TAVI, then decreased at 3 months and was compensated by improvement of longitudinal strain (see figure).ConclusionIn patients with aortic stenosis, radial contraction is load dependant, circumferential contraction is both load- and remodelling-dependant, whereas longitudinal contraction is remodeling-dependant