12 research outputs found

    Reduced primary patency rate in diabetic patients after percutaneous intervention results from more frequent presentation with limb-threatening ischemia

    Get PDF
    ObjectiveAlthough patients with diabetes are at increased risk of amputation from peripheral vascular disease, excellent limb-salvage rates have been achieved with aggressive surgical revascularization. It is less clear whether patients with diabetes will fare as well as nondiabetics after undergoing percutaneous lower extremity revascularization, a modality which is becoming increasingly utilized for this disease process. This study aimed to assess differential outcomes in between diabetics and nondiabetics in lower extremity percutaneous interventions.MethodsWe retrospectively studied 291 patients with respect to patient variables, complications, and outcomes for percutaneous interventions performed for peripheral occlusive disease between 2002 and 2005. Tibial vessel run-off was assessed by angiography. Patency (assessed arterial duplex) was expressed by Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank analysis. Mean follow-up was 11.6 months (range 1 to 56 months).ResultsA total of 385 interventions for peripheral occlusive disease with claudication (52.2%), rest pain (16.4%), or tissue loss (31.4%) were analyzed, including 336 primary interventions and 49 reinterventions (mean patient age 73.9 years, 50.8% male). Comorbidities included diabetes mellitus (57.2%), chronic renal insufficiency (18.4%), hemodialysis (3.8%), hypertension (81.9%), hypercholesterolemia (57%), coronary artery disease (58%), tobacco use (63.2%). Diabetics were significantly more likely to be female (55.3% vs 40.8%), and suffer from CRI (23.5% vs 12.0%), a history of myocardial infarction (36.5% vs 18.0%), and <three-vessel tibial outflow (83.5% vs 71.8%), compared with nondiabetics, although all other comorbidities and lesion characteristics were equivalent between these groups. Overall primary patency (± SE) at 6, 12, and 18 months was 85 ± 2%, 63 ± 3% and 56 ± 4%, respectively. Patients with diabetes suffered reduced primary patency at 1 year compared with nondiabetics. For nondiabetics, primary patency was 88 ± 2%, 71 ± 4%, and 58 ± 4% at 6, 12, and 18 months, while for diabetics it was 82 ± 2%, 53 ± 4%, and 49 ± 4%, respectively (P = .05). Overall secondary patency at 6, 12, and 18 months was 88 ± 2%, 76 ± 3%, and 69 ± 3%, and did not vary by diabetes status. One-year limb salvage rate was 88.3% for patients with limb-threatening ischemia, which was also similar between diabetics and nondiabetics. While univariate analysis revealed that female gender, <three-vessel tibial outflow, and a history of tobacco use were all predictive of reduced primary patency (P < .05), none of these factors significantly impacted secondary patency or limb-salvage rate. Furthermore, only limb-threatening ischemia remained a significant predictor of outcome on multivariate analysis, suggesting that the poorer primary patency in diabetics is related primarily to their propensity to present with limb-threatening disease compared with nondiabetics.ConclusionPatients with diabetes demonstrate reduced primary patency rates after percutaneous treatment of lower extremity occlusive disease, most likely due to their advanced stage of disease at presentation. However, despite a higher reintervention rate, diabetics and others with risk factors predictive of reduced primary patency can attain equivalent short-term secondary patency and limb-salvage rates. Therefore, these patient characteristics should not be considered contraindications to endovascular therapy

    Computer simulation as a component of catheter-based training

    Get PDF
    IntroductionComputer simulation has been used in a variety of training programs, ranging from airline piloting to general surgery. In this study we evaluate the use of simulation to train novice and advanced interventionalists in catheter-based techniques.MethodsTwenty-one physicians underwent evaluation in a simulator training program that involved placement of a carotid stent. Five participants were highly experienced in catheter-based techniques (>300 percutaneous cases), including carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS); the remaining 16 participants were interventional novices (<5 percutaneous cases). The Procedicus VIST simulator, composed of real-time vascular imaging simulation software and a tactile interface coupled to angiographic catheters and guide wires, was used. After didactic instruction regarding CAS and use of the simulator, each participant performed a simulated CAS procedure. The participant's performance was supervised and evaluated by an expert interventionalist on the basis of 50 specific procedural steps with a maximal score of 100. Specific techniques of guide wire and catheter manipulation were subjectively assessed on a scale of 0 to 5 points based on ability. After evaluation of the initial simulated CAS procedure, each participant received a minimum of 2 hours of individualized training by the expert interventionalist, with the VIST simulator. Each participant then performed a second simulated CAS procedure, which was graded with the same scale. After completion, participants assessed the training program and its utility via survey questionnaire.ResultsThe average simulated score for novice participants after the training program improved significantly from 17.8 ± 15.6 to 69.8 ± 9.8 (P < .01), time to complete simulation decreased from 44 ± 10 minutes to 30 ± 8 minutes (P < .01), and fluoroscopy time decreased from 31 ± 7 minutes to 23 ± 7 minutes (P < .01). No statistically significant difference in score, total time, or fluoroscopy time was noted for experienced interventionalists. Improvement was noted in guide wire and catheter manipulation skills in novices.. Analysis of survey data from experienced interventionalists indicated that the simulated clinical scenarios were realistic and that the simulator could be a valuable tool if clinical and tactile feedback were improved. Novices also thought the simulated training was a valuable experience, and desired further training time.ConclusionsAn endovascular training program using the Procedicus VIST haptic simulator resulted in significant improvement in trainee facility with catheter-based techniques in a simulated clinical setting. Novice participants derived the greatest benefit from simulator training in a mentored program, whereas experienced interventionalists did not seem to derive significant benefit

    Ischemic Preconditioning during the Use of the Percusurge Occlusion Balloon for Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting

    No full text
    Ischemic preconditioning (IP) uses transient ischemia to render tissues tolerant to subsequent, prolonged ischemia. This study sought to evaluate factors that contributed to the development of cerebral ischemia during PercuSurge balloon (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA) occlusion in patients undergoing carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS). The PercuSurge occlusion balloon was used in 43 of 165 patients treated with CAS for high-grade stenosis; 20% were symptomatic. Symptoms of cerebral hypoperfusion during temporary occlusion of the internal carotid artery occurred in 10 of 43 patients and included dysarthria, agitation, decreased level of consciousness, and focal hemispheric deficit. The development of neurologic symptoms after initial PercuSurge balloon inflation and occluded internal carotid artery flow was associated with a decrease in the mean Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) from 15 to 10 (range 9–14); the GCS returned to normal after occlusion balloon deflation. The mean time to spontaneous recovery of full neurologic function was 8 minutes (range 4–15 minutes). The mean subsequent procedure duration was 11.9 minutes (range 6–21 minutes). No recurrence of neurologic symptoms occurred when the occlusion balloon was reinflated. All 10 patients underwent successful CAS without occlusion, dissection, cerebrovascular accident, or death. Ischemic preconditioning can be used to enable CAS with embolic protection in patients who cannot tolerate initial interruption of antegrade cerebral perfusion by PercuSurge occlusion

    Donor immunization with pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and early protective antibody responses following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

    Get PDF
    Patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are at increased risk for infections with Streptococcus pneumoniae and have long-lasting, impaired antibody responses to pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccines. We examined whether donor immunization with a heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) would elicit protective antibody responses to additional doses of vaccine administered early after transplantation. Ninety-six patients scheduled to receive an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant were randomized with their donors to receive either a dose of PCV7 vaccine or no vaccine before transplantation. All patients received PCV7 at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months following transplantation, and serotype-specific antibody concentrations were determined after each dose. Following HCT, geometric mean antibody concentrations of patients in the immunized donor group were significantly higher for 5 of the 7 vaccine serotypes after one dose (P \u3c.05) and for 4 of the 7 serotypes after 2 doses of vaccine (P \u3c.03). Sixty-seven percent of patients in the immunized donor group had presumed protective IgG concentrations more than or equal to 0.50 microg/mL to all 7 serotypes following the first dose of vaccine compared to 36% in the unimmunized donor group (P =.05). After the third dose of vaccine, both groups had more than 60% of patients with concentrations at least 0.50 microg/mL to all vaccine serotypes. Donor immunization enhances early antibody responses of patients undergoing HCT to pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. A 3-dose schedule of PCV7 vaccine at 3, 6, and 12 months is immunogenic in these patients regardless of donor immunization

    Carotid angioplasty and stent-induced bradycardia and hypotension: Impact of prophylactic atropine administration and prior carotid endarterectomy

    Get PDF
    ObjectiveWe compared the physiologic effect of selective atropine administration for bradycardia with routine prophylactic administration, before balloon inflation, during carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS). We also compared the incidence of procedural bradycardia and hypotension for CAS in patients with primary stenosis vs those with prior ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy (CEA).MethodsA total of 86 patients were treated with CAS at 3 institutions. Complete periprocedural information was available for 75 of these patients. The median degree of stenosis was 90% (range, 60%-99%). Indications for CAS were severe comorbidities (n = 49), prior CEA (n = 21), and prior neck radiation (n = 5). Twenty patients with primary lesions were treated selectively with atropine only if symptomatic bradycardia occurred (nonprophylactic group). Thirty-four patients with primary lesions received routine prophylactic atropine administration before balloon inflation or stent deployment (prophylactic group). The 21 patients with prior CEA received selective atropine treatment only if symptomatic bradycardia occurred (prior CEA group) and were analyzed separately. Mean age and cardiac comorbidities did not vary significantly either between the prophylactic and nonprophylactic atropine groups or between the primary and prior CEA patient groups. Outcome measures included bradycardia (decrease in heart rate >50% or absolute heart rate <40 bpm), hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg or mean blood pressure <50 mm Hg), requirement for vasopressors, and cardiac morbidity (myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure).ResultsThe overall incidence of hypotension and bradycardia in patients treated with CAS was 25 (33%) of 75. A decreased incidence of intraoperative bradycardia (9% vs 50%; P < .001) and perioperative cardiac morbidity (0% vs 15%; P< .05) was observed in patients with primary stenosis who received prophylactic atropine as compared with patients who did not receive prophylactic atropine. CAS after prior CEA was associated with a significantly lower incidence of perioperative bradycardia (10% vs 33%; P < .05), hypotension (5% vs 32%; P < .05), and vasopressor requirement (5% vs 30%; P < .05), with a trend toward a lower incidence of cardiac morbidity (0% vs 6%; not significant) as compared with patients treated with CAS for primary carotid lesions. There were no significant predictive demographic factors for bradycardia and hypotension after CAS.ConclusionsThe administration of prophylactic atropine before balloon inflation during CAS decreases the incidence of intraoperative bradycardia and cardiac morbidity in primary CAS patients. Periprocedural bradycardia, hypotension, and the need for vasopressors occur more frequently with primary CAS than with redo CAS procedures. On the basis of our data, we recommend that prophylactic atropine administration be considered in patients with primary carotid lesions undergoing CAS
    corecore