Levosimendan in Sepsis.

Commentum to "Levosimendan for the Prevention of Acute Organ Dysfunction in Sepsis

Monocyte subsets, stanford-A acute aortic dissection, and carotid srtery stenosis. new evidences

Monocytes are a heterogeneous cell population distinguished into three subsets with distinctive phenotypic and functional properties: "classical" (CD14++CD16-), "intermediate" (CD14++CD16+), and "nonclassical" (CD14+CD16++). Monocyte subsets play a pivotal role in many inflammatory systemic diseases including atherosclerosis (ATS). Only a low number of studies evaluated monocyte behavior in patients affected by cardiovascular diseases, and data about their role in acute aortic dissection (AAD) are lacking. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate CD14++CD16-, CD14++CD16+, and CD14+CD16++ cells in patients with Stanford-A AAD and in patients with carotid artery stenosis (CAS). Methods. 20 patients with carotid artery stenosis (CAS group), 17 patients with Stanford-A AAD (AAD group), and 17 subjects with traditional cardiovascular risk factors (RF group) were enrolled. Monocyte subset frequency was determined by flow cytometry. Results. Classical monocytes were significantly increased in the AAD group versus CAS and RF groups, whereas intermediate monocytes were significantly decreased in the AAD group versus CAS and RF groups. Conclusions. Results of this study identify in AAD patients a peculiar monocyte array that can partly explain depletion of T CD4+ lymphocyte subpopulations observed in patients affected by AAD.Monocytes are a heterogeneous cell population distinguished into three subsets with distinctive phenotypic and functional properties: classical (CD14++CD16-), intermediate (CD14++CD16+), and nonclassical (CD14+CD16++). Monocyte subsets play a pivotal role in many inflammatory systemic diseases including atherosclerosis (ATS). Only a low number of studies evaluated monocyte behavior in patients affected by cardiovascular diseases, and data about their role in acute aortic dissection (AAD) are lacking. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate CD14++CD16-, CD14++CD16+, and CD14+CD16++ cells in patients with Stanford-A AAD and in patients with carotid artery stenosis (CAS). Methods. 20 patients with carotid artery stenosis (CAS group), 17 patients with Stanford-A AAD (AAD group), and 17 subjects with traditional cardiovascular risk factors (RF group) were enrolled. Monocyte subset frequency was determined by flow cytometry. Results. Classical monocytes were significantly increased in the AAD group versus CAS and RF groups, whereas intermediate monocytes were significantly decreased in the AAD group versus CAS and RF groups. Conclusions. Results of this study identify in AAD patients a peculiar monocyte array that can partly explain depletion of T CD4+ lymphocyte subpopulations observed in patients affected by AAD

The inodilator levosimendan: 20 years of experience in various settings of cardiac care

Levosimendan emerged in the 1990s as a first-in-class inotrope and vasodilator that enhances cardiac contractility by sensitizing the contractile response to cardiac troponin C and causes vasodilatation by opening potassium-dependent ATP channels on vascular smooth muscle cells. Since its clinical debut in 2000, it has established itself as a valuable resource in the management of acute decompensated heart failure and is one of very few successful medical innovations of its kind in that field in recent decades. Its pharmacology is notable for delivering inotropy without an increase in myocardial oxygen consumption and for an array of secondary (‘pleiotropic’) effects that include an anti-ischemic effect, pre-conditioning and post-conditioning and cardioprotective effects and anti-oxidative effects.Proceeding from those properties it has been proposed that in addition to its use in various scenarios of low cardiac output levosimendan may be beneficial in other conditions associated with acutely decompensated heart failure, including right ventricular failure, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and cardiogenic shock with multi-organ dysfunction. The potential of levosimendan for kidney protection in situations of the cardio-renal syndrome has been identified. Additional lines of investigation include the use of levosimendan for perioperative hemodynamic support, its administration as repeated intermittent infusions to sustain patients with advanced heart failure and its application in a range of critical care settings.Levosimendan has also provided a template and a starting point for the development of a new generation of cardio-active drugs and is currently being evaluated in advanced clinical trials for the management of pulmonary hypertension in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

The inodilator levosimendan: 20 years of experience in various settings of cardiac care

n/

Levosimendan for patients with severely reduced left ventricular systolic function and/or low cardiac output syndrome undergoing cardiac surgery. a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Previous studies have shown beneficial effects of levosimendan in high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Two large randomized controlled trials (RCTs), however, showed no advantages of levosimendan. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis (MEDLINE and Embase from inception until March 30, 2017), investigating whether levosimendan offers advantages compared with placebo in high-risk cardiac surgery patients, as defined by preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) = 35% and/or low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS). The primary outcomes were mortality at longest follow-up and need for postoperative renal replacement therapy (RRT). Secondary postoperative outcomes investigated included myocardial injury, supraventricular arrhythmias, development of LCOS, acute kidney injury (AKI), duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay, and incidence of hypotension during drug infusion. Results: Six RCTs were included in the meta-analysis, five of which investigated only patients with LVEF = 35% and one of which included predominantly patients with LCOS. Mortality was similar overall (OR 0.64 [0.37, 1.11], p = 0.11) but lower in the subgroup with LVEF < 35% (OR 0.51 [0.32, 0.82], p = 0.005). Need for RRT was reduced by levosimendan both overall (OR 0.63 [0.42, 0.94], p = 0.02) and in patients with LVEF < 35% (OR 0.55 [0.31, 0.97], p = 0.04). Among secondary outcomes, we found lower postoperative LCOS in patients with LVEF < 35% receiving levosimendan (OR 0.49 [0.27, 0.89], p = 0.02), lower overall AKI (OR 0.62 [0.42, 0.92], p = 0.02), and a trend toward lower mechanical support, both overall (p = 0.07) and in patients with LVEF < 35% (p= 0.05). Conclusions: Levosimendan reduces mortality in patients with preoperative severely reduced LVEF but does not affect overall mortality. Levosimendan reduces the need for RRT after high-risk cardiac surger

Continuous veno-venous hemofiltration using a phosphate-containing replacement fluid in the setting of regional citrate anticoagulation

Purpose: The need for prolonged anticoagulation and the occurrence of hypophosphatemia are well known drawbacks of continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT). The aim was to evaluate the effects on acid-base status and serum phosphate of a regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) protocol for continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) combining the use of citrate with a phosphate-containing replacement fluid. Methods: In a small cohort of heart surgery patients undergoing CRRT for acute kidney injury, we adopted an RCA-CVVH protocol based on a commercially available citrate solution (18 mmol/l) combined with a recently introduced phosphate-containing replacement fluid (HCO3- 30 mmol/l, phosphate 1.2), aimed at preventing phosphate depletion. Results: In 10 high bleeding-risk patients, the RCA-CVVH protocol provided an adequate circuit lifetime (46.8 ± 30.3 h) despite the adoption of a low citrate dose and a higher than usual target circuit Ca2+ (≤0.5 mmol/l). Acid-base status was adequately maintained without the need for additional interventions on RCA-CVVH parameters and without indirect sign of citrate accumulation [(pH 7.43 (7.41-7.47), bicarbonate 24.4 mmol/l (23.2-25.6), BE 0 (-1.5 to 1.1), calcium ratio 1.97 (1.82-2.01); median (IQR)]. Serum phosphate was steadily maintained in a narrow range throughout RCA-CVVH days [1.1 mmol/l (0.9-1.4)]. A low amount of phosphorus supplementation (0.9 ± 2 g/day) was required in only 30% of patients. Conclusions: Although needing further evaluation, the proposed RCA-CVVH protocol ensured a safe and effective RCA without electrolyte and/or acid-base derangements. CRRT-induced hypophospha-temia was prevented in most of the patients by the adoption of a phosphate-containing replacement solution, minimizing phosphate supplementation needs. © 2013 Wichtig Editore

A survey on the use of intra-aortic balloon pump in cardiac surgery

Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is an established tool in the management of cardiac dysfunction in cardiac surgery. The best timing for IABP weaning is unknown and varies greatly among cardiac centers. The authors investigated the differences in IABP management among 66 cardiac surgery centers performing 40,675 cardiac surgery procedures in the 12-month study period. The centers were contacted through email, telephone, or in person interview. IABP management was very heterogeneous in this survey: In 43% centers it was routinely removed on the first postoperative day, and in 34% on the second postoperative day. In 50% centers, it was routinely removed after extubation of the patients whereas in 15% centers it was removed while the patients were sedated and mechanically ventilated. In 66% centers, patients were routinely receiving pharmacological inotropic support at the time of removal of IABP. The practice of decreasing IABP support was also heterogeneous: 57% centers weaned by reducing the ratio of beat assistance whereas 34% centers weaned by reducing balloon volume. We conclude that the management of IABP is heterogeneous and there is a need for large prospective studies on the management of IABP in cardiac surgery

Burnout in cardiac anesthesiologists. results from a national survey in italy

Objective: There is increasing burnout incidence among medical disciplines, and physicians working in emergency settings seem at higher risk. Cardiac anesthesiology is a stressful anesthesiology subspecialty dealing with high-risk patients. The authors hypothesized a high risk of burnout in cardiac anesthesiologists. Design: National survey conducted on burnout Setting: Italian cardiac centers. Participants: Cardiac anesthesiologists. Interventions: The authors administered via email an anonymous questionnaire divided into 3 parts. The first 2 parts evaluated workload and private life. The third part consisted of the Maslach Burnout Inventory test with its 3 constituents: high emotional exhaustion, high depersonalization, and low personal accomplishment. Measurements and Main Results: The authors measured the prevalence and risk of burnout through the Maslach Burnout Inventory questionnaire and analyzed factors influencing burnout. Among 670 contacts from 71 centers, 382 cardiac anesthesiologists completed the survey (57%). The authors found the following mean Maslach Burnout Inventory values: 14.5 ± 9.7 (emotional exhaustion), 9.1 ± 7.1 (depersonalization), and 33.7 ± 8.9 (personal accomplishment). A rate of 34%, 54%, and 66% of respondents scored in “high” or “moderate-high” risk of burnout (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment, respectively). The authors found that, if offered to change subspecialty, 76% of respondents would prefer to remain in cardiac anesthesiology. This preference and parenthood were the only 2 investigated factors with a protective effect against all components of burnout. Significantly lower burnout scores were found in more experienced anesthesiologists. Conclusion: A relatively high incidence of burnout was found in cardiac anesthesiologists, especially regarding high depersonalization and low personal accomplishment. Nonetheless, most of the respondents would choose to remain in cardiac anesthesiology