An Essay on the Determination of Relevancy Under the Federal Rules of Evidence

The scope of the general definition of relevant evidence in the Federal Rules of Evidence is ambiguous. It is unclear whether Congress, for instance, intended that certain issues be considered legislatively determined or that those issues rest within the discretion of the courts. There is also some uncertainty over the definition\u27s applicability to several types of evidence--particularly undisputed facts such as those that provide background information or are judicially admitted

Removal of the Corporate Director During His Term of Office

The traditional rules governing the removal of corporate directors have evolved so as to insulate the board of directors from the shareholders who elect them. Professor Travers in his article examines initially the interests being advanced by protecting the board members from removal by their electorate. He then critically analyzes the law as it relates to these interests in order to suggest a more rational approach