Time spent in hospital after liver transplantation: Effects of primary liver disease and comorbidity.

AIM: To explore the effect of primary liver disease and comorbidities on transplant length of stay (TLOS) and LOS in later admissions in the first two years after liver transplantation (LLOS). METHODS: A linked United Kingdom Liver Transplant Audit - Hospital Episode Statistics database of patients who received a first adult liver transplant between 1997 and 2010 in England was analysed. Patients who died within the first two years were excluded from the primary analysis, but a sensitivity analysis was also performed including all patients. Multivariable linear regression was used to evaluate the impact of primary liver disease and comorbidities on TLOS and LLOS. RESULTS: In 3772 patients, the mean (95%CI) TLOS was 24.8 (24.2 to 25.5) d, and the mean LLOS was 24.2 (22.9 to 25.5) d. Compared to patients with cancer, we found that the largest difference in TLOS was seen for acute hepatic failure group (6.1 d; 2.8 to 9.4) and the largest increase in LLOS was seen for other liver disease group (14.8 d; 8.1 to 21.5). Patients with cardiovascular disease had 8.5 d (5.7 to 11.3) longer TLOS and 6.0 d (0.2 to 11.9) longer LLOS, compare to those without. Patients with congestive cardiac failure had 7.6 d longer TLOS than those without. Other comorbidities did not significantly increase TLOS nor LLOS. CONCLUSION: The time patients spent in hospital varied according to their primary liver disease and some comorbidities. Time spent in hospital of patients with cancer was relatively short compared to most other indications. Cardiovascular disease and congestive cardiac failure were the comorbidities with a strong impact on increased LOS

Time-varying impact of comorbidities on mortality after liver transplantation: a national cohort study using linked clinical and administrative data.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the impact of comorbidity on mortality in three periods after liver transplantation (first 90 days, 90 days-5 years and 5-10 years). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study using records from the UK Liver Transplant Audit (UKLTA) linked to Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), an administrative database of hospital admissions in the English National Health Service (NHS). Comorbidities relevant for liver transplantation were identified from the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes in HES records of admissions in the year preceding their operation. Multivariable Cox regression was used to estimate HRs for three different time periods after liver transplantation. SETTING: All liver transplant centres in the NHS hospitals in England. PARTICIPANTS: Adults who received a first elective liver transplant between April 1997 and March 2010 in the linked UKLTA-HES database. OUTCOMES: Patient mortality in three different time periods after transplantation. RESULTS: Among 3837 recipients, 45.1% had comorbidities. Recipients with cardiovascular disease had statistically significantly higher mortality in all three periods after transplantation (first 90 days: HR=2.0; 95% CI 1.4 to 2.9, 90 days-5 years: 1.6; 1.2 to 2.2, beyond 5 years: 2.8; 1.7 to 4.4). Prior congestive cardiac failure (3.2; 2.1 to 4.9) significantly increased mortality only in the first 90 days. History of non-hepatic malignancy appeared to increase risk over all periods, but significantly only in the first 90 days (1.9; 1.0 to 3.6). A diagnosis of connective tissue disease, dementia, diabetes, chronic pulmonary and renal disease did not have a significant impact on mortality in any period. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of comorbidities present at the time of transplantation changes with time after transplantation. Renal disease, pulmonary disease and diabetes had no impact on mortality in contrast to previous reports

Linkage of a national clinical liver transplant database with administrative hospital data: methods and validation.

INTRODUCTION: The UK Liver Transplant Audit (UKLTA) database contains clinical information on all liver transplants carried out in the UK. To expand its potential for research and service evaluation, we linked it to the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), an administrative database of all admissions to English National Health Service (NHS) hospitals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the UKLTA database, we identified the linkable records of first liver transplantation between April 1997 and March 2010. We linked UKLTA records to HES records on the basis of NHS number, gender, date of birth, and postcode, as well as procedure codes for liver transplantation and dates of transplant. In linked records, agreement of primary liver disease diagnoses according to both databases was expressed as a proportion of the linked records and using kappa statistic. RESULTS: There were 5,815 linkable records in the UKLTA database, of which 4,959 records were successfully linked with HES (85.3%). Among these, 4,922 records (99.3%) had at least one diagnosis coded in HES relevant to an indication for liver transplantation. The overall agreement of primary liver disease diagnoses between UKLTA data and HES was 77.8% (95% CI 76.6%-79.0%) with a kappa of 0.75 (0.74-0.76). Diagnostic agreement can be further improved by using broader groupings of clinically related diagnoses. CONCLUSION: Linkage of clinical data and administrative hospital data provides a rich resource for the study of liver transplantation

Heterogeneity of management practices surrounding operable gallbladder cancer – results of the OMEGA-S international HPB surgical survey

Background: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is an aggressive, uncommon malignancy, with variation in operative approaches adopted across centres and few large-scale studies to guide practice. We aimed to identify the extent of heterogeneity in GBC internationally to better inform the need for future multicentre studies. Methods: A 34-question online survey was disseminated to members of the European-African Hepatopancreatobiliary Association (EAHPBA), American Hepatopancreatobiliary Association (AHPBA) and Asia-Pacific Hepatopancreatobiliary Association (A-PHPBA) regarding practices around diagnostic workup, operative approach, utilization of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies and surveillance strategies. Results: Two hundred and three surgeons responded from 51 countries. High liver resection volume units (>50 resections/year) organised HPB multidisciplinary team discussion of GBCs more commonly than those with low volumes (p < 0.0001). Management practices exhibited areas of heterogeneity, particularly around operative extent. Contrary to consensus guidelines, anatomical liver resections were favoured over non-anatomical resections for T3 tumours and above, lymphadenectomy extent was lower than recommended, and a minority of respondents still routinely excised the common bile duct or port sites. Conclusion: Our findings suggest some similarities in the management of GBC internationally, but also specific areas of practice which differed from published guidelines. Transcontinental collaborative studies on GBC are necessary to establish evidence-based practice to minimise variation and optimise outcomes