Towards a POMDP-based Control in Hybrid Brain-Computer Interfaces

Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI) provide a unique communication channel between the brain and computer systems. After extensive research and implementation on ample fields of application, numerous challenges to assure reliable and quick data processing have resulted in the hybrid BCI (hBCI) paradigm, consisting on the combination of two BCI systems. However, not all challenges have been properly addressed (e.g. re-calibration, idle-state modelling, adaptive thresholds, etc) to allow hBCI implementation outside of the lab. In this paper, we review electroencephalography based hBCI studies and state potential limitations. We propose a sequential decision-making framework based on Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) to design and to control hBCI systems. The POMDP framework is an excellent candidate to deal with the limitations raised above. To illustrate our opinion, an example of architecture using a POMDP-based hBCI control system is provided, and future directions are discussed. We believe this framework will encourage research efforts to provide relevant means to combine information from BCI systems and push BCI out of the laboratory

Towards a POMDP-based Control in Hybrid Brain-Computer Interfaces

International audienceBrain-Computer Interfaces (BCI) provide a unique communication channel between the brain and computer systems. After extensive research and implementation on ample fields of application, numerous challenges to assure reliable and quick data processing have resulted in the hybrid BCI (hBCI) paradigm, consisting on the combination of two BCI systems. However, not all challenges have been properly addressed (e.g. re-calibration, idle-state modelling, adaptive thresholds, etc) to allow hBCI implementation outside of the lab. In this paper, we review electroencephalography based hBCI studies and state potential limitations. We propose a sequential decision-making framework based on Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) to design and to control hBCI systems. The POMDP framework is an excellent candidate to deal with the limitations raised above. To illustrate our opinion, an example of architecture using a POMDP-based hBCI control system is provided, and future directions are discussed. We believe this framework will encourage research efforts to provide relevant means to combine information from BCI systems and push BCI out of the laboratory

Improving user experience of SSVEP BCI through low amplitude depth and high frequency stimuli design

Steady-States Visually Evoked Potentials (SSVEP) refer to the sustained rhythmic activity observed in surface electroencephalography (EEG) in response to the presentation of repetitive visual stimuli (RVS). Due to their robustness and rapid onset, SSVEP have been widely used in Brain Computer Interfaces (BCI). However, typical SSVEP stimuli are straining to the eyes and present risks of triggering epileptic seizures. Reducing visual stimuli contrast or extending their frequency range both appear as relevant solutions to address these issues. It however remains sparsely documented how BCI performance is impacted by these features and to which extent user experience can be improved. We conducted two studies to systematically characterize the effects of frequency and amplitude depth reduction on SSVEP response. The results revealed that although high frequency stimuli improve visual comfort, their classification performance were not competitive enough to design a reliable/responsive BCI. Importantly, we found that the amplitude depth reduction of low frequency RVS is an effective solution to improve user experience while maintaining high classification performance. These findings were further validated by an online T9 SSVEP-BCI in which stimuli with 40% amplitude depth reduction achieved comparable results (>90% accuracy) to full amplitude stimuli while significantly improving user experience

Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams

Data analysis workflows in many scientific domains have become increasingly complex and flexible. Here we assess the effect of this flexibility on the results of functional magnetic resonance imaging by asking 70 independent teams to analyse the same dataset, testing the same 9 ex-ante hypotheses1. The flexibility of analytical approaches is exemplified by the fact that no two teams chose identical workflows to analyse the data. This flexibility resulted in sizeable variation in the results of hypothesis tests, even for teams whose statistical maps were highly correlated at intermediate stages of the analysis pipeline. Variation in reported results was related to several aspects of analysis methodology. Notably, a meta-analytical approach that aggregated information across teams yielded a significant consensus in activated regions. Furthermore, prediction markets of researchers in the field revealed an overestimation of the likelihood of significant findings, even by researchers with direct knowledge of the dataset2–5. Our findings show that analytical flexibility can have substantial effects on scientific conclusions, and identify factors that may be related to variability in the analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging. The results emphasize the importance of validating and sharing complex analysis workflows, and demonstrate the need for performing and reporting multiple analyses of the same data. Potential approaches that could be used to mitigate issues related to analytical variability are discussed.Depto. de Psicobiología y Metodología en Ciencias del ComportamientoFac. de PsicologíaTRUEpu