24 research outputs found

    Embryonal neural tumours and cell death

    Full text link

    Complications of Chemotherapy

    No full text

    Primary non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of bone: A rare cause of lytic bone lesion

    No full text
    Objective: To review the clinical behaviour and treatment outcome of patients with localised primary lymphomas of bone. Patients and Methods: The medical records of patients with primary lymphomas of bone managed at the Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong, from 1994 to 2001 were retrospectively reviewed. Five Chinese patients with this condition were identified. All patients had diffuse large cell lymphomas (New Working Formulation) of B-cell phenotype and were classified as stage IE/IIE by Ann Arbor staging. Four of the 5 patients presented with lytic bone lesions in the long bones of the lower limbs and the remaining patient presented with a lytic lesion in the vertebrae. All patients were treated with anthracycline-based combination chemotherapy, followed by radiotherapy of 40 to 44 Gy. Results: The median follow up was 60 months (range, 28 to 73 months). All patients achieved complete remission after treatment and remained disease-free up to the last assessment. One patient had a complication of fracture during chemotherapy but no late adverse effects on bone healing due to radiotherapy were identified. Conclusions: These results suggest that combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy for localised primary lymphomas of bone can provide excellent local and systemic disease control. Radiotherapy following chemotherapy at doses of approximately 40 to 44 Gy appears to be sufficient for local control of the tumour, with no significant adverse effects on bone healing observed.Link_to_subscribed_fulltex

    Induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine followed by accelerated radiotherapy and concurrent cisplatin in patients with stage IV(A-B) nasopharyngeal carcinoma

    No full text
    Background. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin plus gemcitabine as induction chemotherapy in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods. Thirty-seven patients with stage IV(A-B) NPC were treated with 3 cycles of cisplatin plus gemcitabine (cisplatin 80 mg/m 2 on day 1; gemcitabine 1250 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8) 3-weekly as induction chemotherapy, followed by another 3 cycles of concurrent cisplatin (100 mg/m 2 on day 1) 3-weekly with accelerated radiotherapy (RT) at 70 Gy in 2-Gy fractions, 6 daily fractions per week. Results. The overall response rate to induction chemotherapy was > 90%, and side effects other than uncomplicated hematologic toxicities were uncommon. All patients completed RT, with 92% receiving ≥ 5 cycles of chemotherapy. At a median follow-up of 2.9 years, the 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 76% and 63%, respectively. Conclusions. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine is a well-tolerated, effective, and convenient induction chemotherapy regimen and warrants further studies to confirm its benefit in advanced NPC. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.Link_to_subscribed_fulltex

    Treatment of stage IV(A-B) nasopharyngeal carcinoma by induction-concurrent chemoradiotherapy and accelerated fractionation

    No full text
    Purpose: To explore a more effective strategy for treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma with extensive locoregional disease. Methods and Materials: Between October 1998 and January 2003, 49 patients with Stage IV(A-B) disease infiltrating or abutting neurologic structures were treated with induction-concurrent chemotherapy and accelerated radiotherapy (RT). A combination of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil was used in the induction phase and single-agent cisplatin in the concurrent phase. All patients were irradiated with conformal techniques at 2 Gy/fraction, six daily fractions weekly, to a total dose of 70 Gy. Results: Although 92% of patients had one or more acute toxicities Grade 3 or worse, 96% completed the whole course of RT, and 92% had five or more cycles of chemotherapy. The great majority of toxicities were uneventful, but 1 patient died of neutropenic sepsis. With a median follow-up of 3.1 years, 20 patients had failure at one or more sites and 15 patients died. The 3-year locoregional and distant failure-free rate was 77% and 75%, respectively, and the overall survival rate was 71%. At last follow-up, 27% of patients had developed late Grade 3 or worse toxicity (24% were hearing impairments), but none had radiation-induced neurologic damage. Conclusion: The current strategy achieved encouraging results for this poor prognostic group, and confirmation of the therapeutic gain by a prospective randomized trial is warranted. © 2005 Elsevier Inc.Link_to_subscribed_fulltex

    External Validation of a Nomogram to Predict Survival and Benefit of Concurrent Chemoradiation for Stage II Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

    No full text
    A nomogram was recently published by Sun et al. to predict overall survival (OS) and the additional benefit of concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) vs. radiotherapy (RT) alone, in stage II NPC treated with conventional RT. We aimed to assess the predictors of OS and to externally validate the nomogram in the IMRT era. We analyzed stage II NPC patients treated with definitive RT alone or CCRT between 2001 and 2011 under the territory-wide Hong Kong NPC Study Group 1301 study. Clinical parameters were studied using the Cox proportional hazards model to estimate OS. The nomogram by Sun et al. was applied with 1000 times bootstrap resampling to calculate the concordance index, and we compared the nomogram predicted and observed 5-year OS. There were 482 patients included. The 5-year OS was 89.0%. In the multivariable analysis, an age > 45 years was the only significant predictor of OS (HR, 1.98; 95%CI, 1.15–3.44). Other clinical parameters were insignificant, including the use of CCRT (HR, 0.99; 95%CI, 0.62–1.58). The nomogram yielded a concordance index of 0.55 (95% CI, 0.49–0.62) which lacked clinically meaningful discriminative power. The nomogram proposed by Sun et al. should be interpreted with caution when applied to stage II NPC patients in the IMRT era. The benefit of CCRT remained controversial
    corecore