The cost of severe haemophilia in Europe: the CHESS study

Background Severe haemophilia is associated with major psychological and economic burden for patients, caregivers, and the wider health care system. This burden has been quantified and documented for a number of European countries in recent years. However, few studies have taken a standardised methodology across multiple countries simultaneously, and sought to amalgamate all three levels of burden for severe disease. The overall aim of the ‘Cost of Haemophilia in Europe: a Socioeconomic Survey’ (CHESS) study was to capture the annualised economic and psychosocial burden of severe haemophilia in five European countries. A cross-section of haemophilia specialists (surveyed between January and April 2015) provided demographic and clinical information and 12-month ambulatory and secondary care activity for patients via an online survey. In turn, patients provided corresponding direct and indirect non-medical cost information, including work loss and out-of-pocket expenses, as well as information on quality of life and adherence. The direct and indirect costs for the patient sample were calculated and extrapolated to population level. Results Clinical reports for a total of 1,285 patients were received. Five hundred and fifty-two patients (43% of the sample) provided information on indirect costs and health-related quality of life via the PSC. The total annual cost of severe haemophilia across the five countries for 2014 was estimated at EUR 1.4 billion, or just under EUR 200,000 per patient. The highest per-patient costs were in Germany (mean EUR 319,024) and the lowest were in the United Kingdom (mean EUR 129,365), with a study average of EUR 199,541. As expected, consumption of clotting factor replacement therapy represented the vast majority of costs (up to 99%). Indirect costs are driven by patient and caregiver work loss. Conclusions The results of the CHESS study reflect previous research findings suggesting that costs of factor replacement therapy account for the vast majority of the cost burden in severe haemophilia. However, the importance of the indirect impact of haemophilia on the patient and family should not be overlooked. The CHESS study highlights the benefits of observational study methodologies in capturing a ‘snapshot’ of information for patients with rare diseases

Matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison of ozanimod versus teriflunomide for relapsing multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: A growing number of immunomodulating disease-modifying therapies are available for treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). In the absence of randomized head-to-head trials, matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) can be used to adjust for cross-trial differences and evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of these agents. We used MAIC methodology to indirectly compare key outcomes with ozanimod (OZM) and teriflunomide (TERI) in the treatment of RMS. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of OZM vs TERI. Given the absence of head-to-head trials of OZM vs TERI, we used a matching-adjusted indirect comparison to adjust for potential treatment effect modifiers and prognostic factors while assessing confirmed disability progression (CDP), relapse, and safety outcomes. Individual patient data for OZM (SUNBEAM and RADIANCE Part B trials) and aggregate level data for TERI (ASCLEPIOS I/II, TOWER, OPTIMUM, and TEMSO trials) were used to evaluate the following outcomes: annualized relapse rate (ARR), proportion of patients relapsed, CDP at 3 and 6 months, overall adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and discontinuations due to AEs. RESULTS: After matching, baseline patient characteristics were balanced between OZM and TERI. Compared with TERI, OZM demonstrated significant improvements in ARR (rate ratio: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.62-0.84), proportion of patients relapsed (odds ratio [OR]: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.44-0.70), overall AEs (OR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.29-0.43), SAEs (OR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.37-0.77), and discontinuations due to AEs (OR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.09-0.21). OZM demonstrated statistically significant improvements in CDP at 3 months (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.66-0.92) but nonsignificant differences at 6 months (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.60-1.01) compared with TERI. CONCLUSION: In this indirect treatment comparison of patients with RMS, OZM appeared to have an improved benefit-risk profile over TERI

Cost-effectiveness of apremilast in moderate to severe psoriasis in the United Kingdom

Purpose: Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. The cost-effectiveness of introducing apremilast before biologics was assessed from a UK payer perspective. Materials and methods: A 10-year Markov cohort model was developed to compare alternative treatment sequences: (1) apremilast followed by adalimumab and etanercept and (2) adalimumab followed by etanercept. Non-responders moved to the next treatment line, and patients for whom etanercept therapy failed continued on best supportive care (BSC) in both sequences. Response was defined as a ≥ 75% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI-75) at the end of the trial periods (12‒16 weeks). A network meta-analysis provided efficacy inputs. Results: As a treatment-extension strategy, apremilast had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £20,593 per quality-adjusted life-year gained versus the comparator sequence. PASI-75 was sustained for 0.73 additional years, and the total time on biologics and BSC was reduced by 0.44 and 1.01 years, respectively. These results were consistent with findings from sensitivity and scenario analyses. Conclusions: Apremilast, an oral treatment option for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, is cost-effective from a UK payer perspective when administered before biologics based on assumptions detailed within this analysis

Use of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy−Anemia in Persons with Myeloproliferative Neoplasm-Associated Myelofibrosis and Anemia

none10Anemia is common in myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN)-associated myelofibrosis. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) measurement system is a patient-reported outcomes instrument that documents symptoms of the diverse aspects of cancer treatment. One FACT version, FACT-Anemia (FACT-An), documents symptoms of anemia related to cancer. The FACT-An has been validated in diverse cancer populations, but not in MPN-associated myelofibrosis. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the relationship between anemia response to therapy with pomalidomide with or without corticosteroids and patient-reported outcomes using the FACT-An instrument. METHODS: Data were obtained from a Phase II, randomized, double-blind Bayesian pick-the-winner trial of prednisone and pomalidomide in patients with MPN-associated myelofibrosis and anemia (red blood cell-transfusion dependence). Details of the study, including definitions of anemia, anemia response, red blood cell-transfusion, red blood cell-transfusion dependence, and red blood cell-transfusion independence, are reported. Change in quality of life from randomization to the last cycle of therapy was evaluated using the FACT-An Physical Well Being, Functional Well Being, Trial Outcome Index, and Anemia domains. Clinically important differences were used to determine the smallest difference in scores that patients perceived as beneficial in the FACT-An domains of interest. Patients were classified as meeting clinically important differences for responsiveness if their change score from baseline was >1 SEM, indicating improvement. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients were studied. Thirty-one patients (37%) were classified as anemia responders by prospectively defined criteria. Across all FACT-An domains, anemia responders showed greater improvement in Physical Well Being, Functional Well Being, and Trial Outcome Index scores than did nonresponders. This improvement began at the second 28-day cycle of therapy and was sustained. CONCLUSIONS: We show a correlation between anemia response and improved quality of life measured by the FACT-An instrument in patients with MPN-associated myelofibrosis and anemia.Ayalew Tefferi;Stacie Hudgens;Ruben Mesa;Robert Peter Gale;Srdan Verstovsek;Francesco Passamonti;Francisco Cervantes;Candido Rivera;Tom Tencer;Zeba M. KhanAyalew, Tefferi; Stacie, Hudgens; Ruben, Mesa; Robert Peter, Gale; Srdan, Verstovsek; Passamonti, Francesco; Francisco, Cervantes; Candido, Rivera; Tom, Tencer; Zeba M., Kha