The Course and Impact of Post-Stroke Insomnia in Stroke Survivors aged 18 to 65 years: results from the Psychosocial Outcomes in StrokE (POISE) study

BACKGROUND: Insomnia symptoms are common in the population and have negative psychosocial and functional sequelae. There are no prospective studies of the course of such symptoms and their impact, if any, in stroke survivors. This prospective cohort study investigated insomnia after stroke in working-age adults, and evaluated its impact on psychological and functional outcomes over the subsequent year. METHODS: We prospectively recruited 441 young (<65 years) consecutive stroke survivors from 20 public hospitals in the New South Wales Stroke Service network. Participants were assessed by self-report and interview at 28 days, six months and 12 months after stroke. Insomnia was defined using a common epidemiological measure of sleep disturbance and daytime consequences. Depression, anxiety, disability and return to work were assessed through standardized measures. RESULTS The point prevalence of insomnia at each time point in the year after stroke was stable at 30-37% and more common in females. 58 (16%) of all participants reported 'chronic' insomnia, with symptoms at both baseline and six months later. At 12 months this group was more likely to be depressed (OR 6.75, 95% CI 2.78-16.4), anxious (OR 3.31, 95% CI 1.54- 7.09), disabled (OR 3.60, 95% CI 2.07-6.25) and not have returned to work, compared to those without insomnia over the same period. CONCLUSIONS Chronic insomnia has a negative effect on disability and return to work one year after stroke even after adjusting for demographic, psychiatric and disability factors. Identifying and appropriately targeting insomnia through known effective treatments may improve functional outcomes after stroke

Factors associated with cognitive impairment before intracerebral haemorrhage:community-based neuropathological study

Little is known about whether clinical, radiological or neuropathological features are associated with cognitive impairment before intracerebral haemorrhage. We conducted a community-based cohort study of 125 adults with intracerebral haemorrhage (lobar n = 71, non-lobar n = 54) with consent to brain autopsy. We compared small vessel disease biomarkers on diagnostic CT head and neuropathological findings including neurofibrillary tangles and amyloid plaques in adults without cognitive impairment versus cognitive impairment without dementia versus dementia before intracerebral haemorrhage, stratified by lobar and non-lobar intracerebral haemorrhage. In non-lobar intracerebral haemorrhage, severe cortical atrophy was less common in those without cognitive impairment (8/36, 22%) and cognitive impairment without dementia (0/9, 0%) versus dementia (5/9, 56%); P = 0.008. Irrespective of intracerebral haemorrhage location, adults without cognitive impairment had milder neurofibrillary tangle pathology measured by median Braak stage (lobar intracerebral haemorrhage: no cognitive impairment 2 [interquartile range, 2-3] versus cognitive impairment without dementia 4 [2-6] versus dementia 5.5 [4-6]; P = 0.004; non-lobar intracerebral haemorrhage: no cognitive impairment 2 [1-2] versus cognitive impairment without dementia 2 [1-2] versus dementia 5 [3-6]; P &lt; 0.001). Irrespective of intracerebral haemorrhage location, adults without cognitive impairment had milder amyloid plaque pathology measured by median Thal stage (lobar intracerebral haemorrhage: no cognitive impairment 2 [1-2] versus cognitive impairment without dementia 2 [2-3] versus dementia 2.5 [2-3.5]; P = 0.033; non-lobar intracerebral haemorrhage: no cognitive impairment 1 [0-1] versus cognitive impairment without dementia 0 [0-2] versus dementia 3 [2-3]; P = 0.002). Our findings suggest that irrespective of intracerebral haemorrhage location, adults with cognitive impairment before an intracerebral haemorrhage have more Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic change. </p

Association between systolic blood pressure variability and severity of cerebral amyloid angiopathy in incident intracerebral hemorrhage

IntroductionThe role of systolic blood pressure (SBP) variability in the pathogenesis of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) as an underlying cause of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is unknown. We studied SBP variability before ICH according to CAA severity at autopsy.MethodsWe collected office (primary care or hospital clinic) BP readings during 10 years before first-ever ICH onset in adults who died and had brain research autopsy in the Lothian IntraCerebral Hemorrhage, Pathology, Imaging, and Neurological Outcome (LINCHPIN), prospective, population-based, inception cohort study. A neuropathologist assessed CAA severity using a histopathological rating scale, masked to BP readings. Functional principal component analysis was used to model SBP levels by time before ICH, and logistic regression models assessed associations of SBP variability indices with CAA severity (moderate-severe vs. absent-mild) adjusted for age, gender, and mean SBP.ResultsAmong 72 adults (median age 81 [interquartile range 76–86], 56% female, median number of SBP readings 11 [3–19]), patients with moderate-severe CAA had similar mean SBP (143 vs. 145 mmHg, P = 0.588) but lower SBP variability (SBP standard deviation [SD] 14 vs. 17 mmHg, P = 0.033) compared with patients with absent-mild CAA, and their SBP trajectories seemed to differ over 10 years before ICH. The odds of moderate-severe CAA were higher with lower maximum SBP (adjusted OR per 10 mmHg lower: 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09–2.15; P = 0.015) and lower SBP range (1.29 [1.03–1.61]; P = 0.028), but not SBP SD (1.95 [0.87–4.38]; P = 0.11).DiscussionCompared with absent-mild autopsy-verified CAA, moderate-severe CAA is associated with lower maximum and range of pre-morbid SBP

Early Blood Pressure Lowering Does Not Reduce Growth of Intraventricular Hemorrhage following Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage:Results of the INTERACT Studies

Background: Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) extension is common following acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and is associated with poor prognosis. Aim: To determine whether intensive blood pressure (BP)-lowering therapy reduces IVH growth. Methods: Pooled analyses of the Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage Trials (INTERACT1 and INTERACT2) computed tomography (CT) substudies; multicenter, open, controlled, randomized trials of patients with acute spontaneous ICH and elevated systolic BP, randomly assigned to intensive (Results: There was no significant difference in adjusted mean IVH growth following intensive (n = 228) compared to guideline-recommended (n = 228) BP treatment (1.6 versus 2.2 ml, respectively; p = 0.56). Adjusted mean IVH growth was nonsignificantly greater in patients with a mean achieved systolic BP ≥160 mm Hg over 24 h (3.94 ml; p trend = 0.26). Conclusions: Early intensive BP-lowering treatment had no clear effect on IVH in acute ICH

Perihaematomal oedema evolution over two weeks after spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage and association with outcome:prospective cohort study

Introduction We know little about the evolution of perihaematomal oedema (PHO) &amp;gt;24 hours after ICH onset. We aimed to determine the trajectory of PHO after ICH onset and its association with outcome. Methods We did a prospective cohort study using a pre-specified scanning protocol in adults with first-ever spontaneous ICH and measured absolute PHO volumes on CT head scans at ICH diagnosis and 3±2, 7±2 and 14±2 days after ICH onset. We used the largest ICH if ICHs were multiple. The primary outcomes were (a) the trajectory of PHO after ICH onset and (b) the association between PHO (absolute volume at the time when most repeat CT head scans were obtained, and change in PHO volume at this time compared with the first CT head scan) and poor functional outcome (modified Rankin scale 3-6 at 90 days). We pre-specified multivariable logistic regression models of this association adjusting analyses for potential confounders: age, GCS, infratentorial ICH location and intraventricular extension. Results In 106 participants of whom forty nine (46%) were female, with a median ICH volume 7ml (interquartile range [IQR] 2-22ml), the trajectory of median PHO volume was an increase from 14ml (IQR 7-26ml) at diagnosis to 18ml (IQR 8-40ml) at 3±2 days (n=87), 20ml (IQR 8-48ml) at 7±2 days (n=93) and 21ml (IQR 10-54ml) at 14±2 days (n=78) (p=&amp;lt;0.001). PHO volume at each time point was collinear with ICH volume at diagnosis (│r│&amp;gt;0.7) but the change in PHO volume between diagnosis and each time point was not. Given collinearity, we used total lesion (i.e. ICH+PHO) volume instead of PHO volume in a logistic regression model of its association at each time point with outcome. Increasing total lesion (ICH+PHO) volume at day 7±2 was associated with poor functional outcome (adjusted OR per ml 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.03; p=0.036) but the increase in PHO volume between diagnosis and day 7±2 was not associated with poor functional outcome (adjusted OR per ml 1.03, 95% CI 0.99-1.07; p=0.132). Conclusion PHO volume increases throughout the first two weeks after onset of mild to moderate ICH. Total lesion (ICH+PHO) volume at day 7±2 was associated with poor functional outcome but the change in PHO volume between diagnosis and day 7±2 was not. Prospective cohort studies with larger sample sizes are needed to investigate these associations and their modifiers.</p

Risks of recurrent stroke and all serious vascular events after spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage: pooled analyses of two population-based studies

BACKGROUND: Patients with stroke due to spontaneous (non-traumatic) intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) are at risk of recurrent ICH, ischaemic stroke, and other serious vascular events. We aimed to analyse these risks in population-based studies and compare them with the risks in RESTART, which assessed antiplatelet therapy after ICH. METHODS: We pooled individual patient data from two prospective, population-based inception cohort studies of all patients with an incident firs-in-a-lifetime ICH in Oxfordshire, England (Oxford Vascular Study; April 1, 2002, to Sept 28, 2018) and Lothian, Scotland, UK (Lothian Audit of the Treatment of Cerebral Haemorrhage; June 1, 2010, to May 31, 2013). We quantified the absolute and relative risks of recurrent ICH, ischaemic stroke, or any serious vascular event (non-fatal stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or vascular death), stratified by ICH location (lobar vs non-lobar) and comorbid atrial fibrillation (AF). We compared pooled event rates with those after allocation to avoid antiplatelet therapy in RESTART. FINDINGS: Among 674 patients (mean age 74·7 years [SD 12·6], 320 [47%] men) with 1553 person-years of follow-up, 46 recurrent ICHs (event rate 3·2 per 100 patient-years, 95% CI 2·0-5·1) and 25 ischaemic strokes (1·7 per 100 patient-years, 0·8-3·3) were reported. Patients with lobar ICH (n=317) had higher risk of recurrent ICH (5·1 per 100 patient-years, 95% CI 3·6-7·2) than patients with non-lobar ICH (n=355; 1·8 per 100 patient-years, 1·0-3·3; hazard ratio [HR] 3·2, 95% CI 1·6-6·3; p=0·0010), but there was no evidence of a difference in the risk of ischaemic stroke (1·8 per 100 patient-years, 1·0-3·2, vs 1·6 per 100 patient-years, 0·6-4·4; HR 1·1, 95% CI 0·5-2·8). Conversely, there was no evidence of a difference in recurrent ICH rate in patients with AF (n=147; 3·3 per 100 patient-years, 95% CI 1·0-10·7) compared with those without (n=526; 3·2 per 100 patient-years, 2·2-4·7; HR 0·9, 95% CI 0·4-2·1), but the risk of ischaemic stroke was higher with AF (6·3 per 100 patient-years, 3·7-10·9, vs 0·7 per 100 patient-years, 0·1-5·6; HR 8·2, 3·3-20·3; p<0·0001), resulting in patients with AF having a higher risk of all serious vascular events than patients without AF (15·5 per 100 patient-years, 10·0-24·1, vs 6·8 per 100 patient-years, 3·6-12·5; HR 1·78, 95% CI 1·16-2·74; p=0·0090). Only for patients with lobar ICH without comorbid AF was the risk of recurrent ICH greater than the risk of ischaemic stroke (5·2 per 100 patient-years, 95% CI 3·6-7·5, vs 0·9 per 100 patient-years, 0·2-4·8; p=0·00034). Comparing data from the pooled population-based studies with that from patients allocated to not receive antiplatelet therapy in RESTART, there was no evidence of a difference in the rate of recurrent ICH (3·5 per 100 patient-years, 95% CI 1·9-6·0, vs 4·4 per 100 patient-years, 2·6-6·1) or ischaemic stroke (3·4 per 100 patient-years, 1·9-5·9, vs 5·3 per 100 patient-years, 3·3-7·2). INTERPRETATION: The risks of recurrent ICH, ischaemic stroke, and all serious vascular events after ICH differ by ICH location and comorbid AF. These data enable risk stratification of patients in clinical practice and ongoing randomised trials. FUNDING: UK Medical Research Council, Stroke Association, British Heart Foundation, Wellcome Trust, and the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre

Who will benefit more from low-dose alteplase in acute ischemic stroke?

Objectives: Controversy persists over the benefits of low-dose versus standard-dose intravenous alteplase for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. We sought to determine individual patient factors that contribute to the risk–benefit balance of low-dose alteplase treatment. Methods: Observational study using data from the Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study (ENCHANTED), an international, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial that assessed low-dose (0.6 mg/kg) versus standard-dose (0.9 mg/kg) intravenous alteplase in acute ischemic stroke patients. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the benefit of good functional outcome (scores 0 or 1 on the modified Rankin scale at 90 days) and risk (symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage), under both regimens for individual patients. The net advantage for low-dose, relative to standard-dose, alteplase was calculated by dividing excess benefit by excess risk according to a combination of patient characteristics. The algorithms were externally validated in a nationwide acute stroke registry database in South Korea. Results: Patients with an estimated net advantage from low-dose alteplase, compared with without, were younger (mean age of 66 vs. 75 years), had lower systolic blood pressure (148 vs. 160 mm Hg), lower National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score (median of 8 vs. 16), and no atrial fibrillation (10.3% vs. 97.4%), diabetes mellitus (19.2% vs. 22.4%), or premorbid symptoms (defined by modified Rankin scale = 1) (16.3% vs. 37.8%). Conclusion: Use of low-dose alteplase may be preferable in acute ischemic stroke patients with a combination of favorable characteristics, including younger age, lower systolic blood pressure, mild neurological impairment, and no atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, or premorbid symptoms.</p