2005 immunosuppressive strategies in kidney transplantation: which role for the calcineurin inhibitors?

The calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) cyclosporine and tacrolimus have been the cornerstones of immunosuppressive strategies in clinical transplantation. Currently, regimens that are most widely used for induction and maintenance therapy include CNIs. However, many clinical trials aiming at reducing or eliminating CNIs have been performed in recent years. Here, we review and discuss current and future immunosuppressive strategies with a special emphasis on the role of CNIs, in the light of recent studies in the field of kidney transplantation. In the current era, CNIs still play an important role

Hepatitis C, acute humoral rejection, and renal allograft survival

The effect of recipient hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection on renal allograft loss and acute rejection in kidney transplantation remains controversial. We studied 354 renal allograft recipients transplanted during 1996 to 2001 who had HCV antibodies (Ab) measured before transplantation. The primary outcome was death-censored allograft loss and the secondary outcome was acute humoral rejection (AHR). Compared with HCV Ab-negative patients, those with positive HCV Ab had longer time on dialysis before transplantation, higher percentage of panel-reactive antibodies (PRA), were more likely to receive a cadaveric transplant, and were more likely to develop delayed graft function (DGF). In univariate analyses, predictors of renal allograft loss included HCV, cadaveric graft, PRA >20%, HLA mismatch > or =5, retransplantation, DGF, induction therapy, and AHR. When adjusted for PRA >20%, HLA mismatch > or =5, and multiple transplant status, HCV was not a statistically significant predictor of allograft loss. HCV was also associated with AHR but lost significance when adjusted for PRA >20%. HCV Ab-positive patients were more likely to have longer duration of dialysis before transplantation prior to kidney transplants, higher PRA, and to receive cadaveric transplants. These characteristics likely resulted in more DGF and AHR after transplantation. After adjusting for these confounding factors, the association between HCV Ab positivity and renal allograft loss was notably attenuated and no longer statistically significant

Hepatitis C virus infection in haemodialysis and kidney transplant patients.

Chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an important global health problem. The prevalence of HCV is significantly higher in haemodialysis and kidney transplant patients, as compared to the general population. In spite of the relatively milder liver disease activity reported in HCV-infected haemodialysis patients, HCV infection adversely affects survival. Likewise, HCV has a detrimental effect on both patient and graft survival after kidney transplantation. However, patient survival is significantly better with kidney transplantation compared to remaining on dialysis; therefore, HCV infection alone should not be a contraindication to transplantation. Combination antiviral therapy with pegylated interferon-alpha and low-dose ribavirin is currently evolving in haemodialysis patients. Interferon-alpha (standard/pegylated) is relatively contraindicated after kidney transplantation because of an increased risk of allograft rejection. Therefore, antiviral treatment of transplant candidates while on dialysis remains the best option and may avoid the risk of HCV-associated liver and renal disease after transplantation. Large multi-centre clinical trials are required in HCV-infected haemodialysis and kidney transplant patients in order to define optimal therapeutic strategies before and after transplantation

Overlapping Pathways to Transplant Glomerulopathy: Chronic Humoral Rejection, Hepatitis C Infection and Thrombotic Microangiopathy

Background:Transplant glomerulopathy (TG) has received much attention in recent years as a manifestation of chronic humoral rejection (CHR). However, many cases lack C4d deposition and/or circulating donor-specifi c antibodies, and the contribution of other potential causes has not been fully addressed.Methods: Of 209 consecutive renal allograft indication biopsies performed for chronic allograft dysfunction, 25 that met pathologic criteria of TG (>10% duplication of the GBM without immune complex deposition) were examined for various etiologies, including hepatitis C infection (HCV), thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), and CHR. 29 cases of biopsy-proven isolated chronic calcineurin inhibitor toxicity from the same time period were used as controls for comparing the prevalence of HCV.Results: Three partially overlapping categories accounted for 84% of the cases: C4d+TG (48%), HCV+TG (36%) and TMA+TG (32%). The majority of TMA+ cases were HCV+ (63%) and the majority of HCV+ cases had TMA (56%). Donor specifi c antibodies were associated with C4d+TG (7/8 vs. 1/4 C4d-TG; P<0.02), but not with HCV+TG. The prevalence of HCV was higher in the TG group than in 29 control patients without TG (36% vs. 7%, P<0.01). HCV+TG patients developed allograft failure earlier than HCV-TG patients (67.2 ± 60.2 mo versus 153.4 ± 126.2 mo, P=0.02). On a multivariate analysis, out of HCV, TG and C4d, only HCV was found to be a signifi cant risk factor for a more rapid allograft loss.Conclusion: We conclude that TG is not a specifi c diagnosis, but a pattern of pathologic injury with 3 major overlapping pathways involving CHR, HCV infection and TMA. It is important to distinguish these mechanisms, as they may have differentprognostic and therapeutic implications

Interferon-alpha therapy in liver transplant recipients: lack of association with increased production of anti-HLA antibodies

Interferon-alpha (IFN) is a useful treatment for active HCV infection. In kidney transplantation, IFN has been shown to trigger acute rejection with de novo anti-HLA antibodies. Interferon-alpha has not been reported to enhance the risk of acute rejection in HCV-positive liver transplant recipients (LTRs). Sera were collected from 44 LTRs greater than 6 months post-transplant. Sera were tested with ELISA for the presence and the specificity of anti-HLA antibodies. The prevalence of anti-HLA antibodies was 11% and was not significantly different in 13 HCV-positive recipients who received IFN, compared with 10 who did not receive IFN (8% vs. 20%), or with 21 HCV-negative recipients (10%). None of the patients had an acute rejection after starting IFN. In this study, LTRs receiving IFN did not have an increased frequency of anti-HLA antibodies. This may partially explain the safety of IFN previously reported in LTRs requiring antiviral therapy