5 research outputs found

    Transatlantic intelligence and security cooperation

    Get PDF
    Despite recent advances in transatlantic intelligence and security cooperation, significant problems remain. The bombings in Madrid in March 2004 have demonstrated how terrorists and criminals can continue to exploit the limits of hesitant or partial exchange to dangerous effect. Intelligence and security cooperation remain problematic because of the fundamental tension between an increasingly networked world, which is ideal terrain for the new religious terrorism, and highly compartmentalized national intelligence gathering. If cooperation is to improve, we require a better mutual understanding about the relationship between privacy and security to help us decide what sort of intelligence should be shared. This is a higher priority than building elaborate new structures. While most practical problems of intelligence exchange are ultimately resolvable, the challenge of agreeing what the intelligence means in broad terms is even more problematic. The last section of this article argues that shared NATO intelligence estimates would be difficult to achieve and of doubtful value

    Modelling of Fed-batch Fermentation Process with Droppings for L-lysine Production

    No full text
    The aim of the article is the development of dynamic unstructured model of L-lysine fed-batch fermentation process with droppings. This approach includes the following procedures: description of the process by generalized stoichiometric equations; preliminary data processing; identification of the specific rates (growth rate (mu) , substrate utilization rate (nu), production rate (rho); establishment and optimization of the dynamic model of the process; simulation researches

    Regulation of cell death in cancer diseases - importance and therapeutic effect

    No full text
    ΠšΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½Π°Ρ‚Π° роля Π½Π° Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΊΠ»Π΅- Ρ‚ΡŠΡ‡Π½Π° ΡΠΌΡŠΡ€Ρ‚ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ заболявания Π΅ слоТна ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ΄ΡŠΠ»ΠΆΠ°Π²Π° Π΄Π° сС Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΠ²Π°. ΠΠ°Π±Π»ΡŽΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ‚Π° ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π²Π°Ρ‚, Ρ‡Π΅ ΠΈ Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ процСса: Π°ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡ‚ΠΎΠ·Π°, Π°Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ„Π°- гия ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ·Π°, ΠΌΠΎΠ³Π°Ρ‚ Π΄Π° ΡΡŠΡ‰Π΅ΡΡ‚Π²ΡƒΠ²Π°Ρ‚ Π² Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ Ρ‚Ρƒ- ΠΌΠΎΡ€ ΠΈ тяхното относитСлно участиС Π΄ΠΈΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΠ²Π° траСкторията Π½Π° туморния растСТ, рСгрСсия ΠΈ ΠΎΡ‚Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ€ към Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‚ΡƒΠΌΠΎΡ€Π½Π° тСрапия. ΠΠ½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΡŠΡ‚ Π½Π° ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΡŠΡ‡Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° сигнализация ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅ Π΄Π° Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ Π΄Π° осигури Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠ°Ρ€ΠΊΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈ, отразяващи Ρ„ΡƒΠ½ΠΊ- Ρ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° активност Π½Π° Ρ‚Π΅Π·ΠΈ процСси, ΠΊΠΎΠΈ- Ρ‚ΠΎ Ρ‰Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³Π½Π°Ρ‚ ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ΡƒΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° тСрапия ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°Ρ€Ρ†ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠ½ΠΎ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅. Π’ Ρ‚ΠΎΠ·ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π³Π»Π΅Π΄ смС сС спрСли Π½Π° някои основни ΠΏΡŠΡ‚ΠΈΡ‰Π° ΠΈ Ρ€Π΅Π³ΡƒΠ»Π°- Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈ, ΡΠ²ΡŠΡ€Π·Π°Π½ΠΈ с ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΡŠΡ‡Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° ΡΠΌΡŠΡ€Ρ‚ ΠΈ оцСляванС, ΠΊΠΎΠΈΡ‚ΠΎ осигуряват ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚Π½Π° устойчивост Π² Ρ‚ΡƒΠΌΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅, Π²ΠΎΠ΄Π΅Ρ‰ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎ рСзистСнтност към Ρ…ΠΈΠΌΠΈ- отСрапия ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΡƒΡΠΏΠ΅ΡˆΠ½ΠΎ Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π° Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ°.The complex role of different types of cell death in cancer is very complicated and continues to be re- vealed. Π’he observations show that all three processes- apoptosis, autophagy and necrosis may exist in a tu- mor, and their relative involvement dictates the trajec- tory of tumor growth, regression and response to an- ti-tumor therapy. Cellular signaling analysis may re- veal and provide new biomarkers reflecting the func- tional activity of these processes that will support in- dividualized therapy in cancer patients. In this review we have accentuated of some major roads and regu- lators associated with cell death and survival, which provide the metabolic stability in tumors, leading to resistance to chemotherapy and unsuccessful cancer treatment

    BECLIN 1 - Π Π΅Π³ΡƒΠ»Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Π΅Π½ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚Π΅ΠΈΠ½ Π½Π° автофагията

    No full text
    Π˜Π·ΡƒΡ‡Π°Π²Π°Π½Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎ Π½Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Π΅Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈ Π½Π° автофагията Π΅ сравнитСлно Π½ΠΎΠ²Π° област Π½Π° ΠΈΠ·- слСдванС, ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π²Π°Ρ‰Π°, Ρ‡Π΅ тя ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅ Π΄Π° ΡƒΠΏΡ€Π°ΠΆΠ½ΠΈ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΡ„ΡƒΠ½ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»Π½ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈ Ρ€ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ, ΡΠ²ΡŠΡ€- Π·Π°Π½ΠΈ с ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΡŠΡ‡Π½ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎ оцСляванС ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠΌΡŠΡ€Ρ‚. Нару- ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ‚Π° Π² процСситС Π½Π° автофагия ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΈΠΊ- Π²Π°Ρ‚ чувствитСлност към ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π½ стрСс, Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ½ΠΎ ΡƒΠ²Ρ€Π΅ΠΆΠ΄Π°Π½Π΅, Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½Π° ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΡŠΡ‡Π½Π° пролифСрация, рСзистСнтност към Ρ…ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠΎΡ‚Π΅- рапия ΠΈ оцСляванС Π½Π° Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΈ ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠΈ. Beclin 1 Π±Π΅ ΠΏΡŠΡ€Π²ΠΈΡΡ‚ ΠΎΡ‚ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΡ‚ ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΠΈΡ€Π°Ρ‰ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚Π΅ΠΈΠ½ с Π΄ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°- Π½Π° роля Π² Ρ€Π΅Π³ΡƒΠ»ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½Π΅ Π½Π° процСситС Π½Π° Π°Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ„Π°- гия, която ΠΎΠ±Π°Ρ‡Π΅ проявява Ρ„ΡƒΠ½ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»Π½Π° Π΄Π²ΠΎΠΉ- ствСност ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ сСлСктивното взаимодСйствиС Π½Π° Beclin 1 с Ρ€Π΅Π³ΡƒΠ»Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΡŠΡ‡Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° хомСостаза, ΡΠΌΡŠΡ€Ρ‚, растСТ, ΠΈΠΌΡƒΠ½Π΅Π½ ΠΎΡ‚Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ€, Π²ΠΊΠ». вируси ΠΈ Π΄Ρ€. Π’ΠΎΠ²Π° ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΈ проучванията Π½Π° Beclin 1 Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π½Π΅ само ΠΊΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎ спСцифичСн ΠΌΠ°Ρ€ΠΊΠ΅Ρ€ Π² ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ„ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΡ€Π°- Π½Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎ Π½Π° Ρ€Π΅Π³ΡƒΠ»Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ…Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΈ, участващи Π² Ρ‚Π΅Π·ΠΈ процСси, Π½ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΡ†Π΅Π»Π½Π° ΠΌΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡƒΠ»Π° Π·Π° Ρ„Π°Ρ€ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄ΡƒΠ»ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½Π΅ Π½Π° ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎ- Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π°Π½Π΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈ заболявани

    RIPK3 expression as a potential predictive and prognostic marker in metastatic colon cancer

    No full text
    Background: Colorectal cancer is one of the primary causes of cancer-related deaths and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) therapy remains the cornerstone of treatment in these patients. Resistance to 5-FU represents a major obstacle; therefore, finding new predictive and prognostic markers is crucial for improvement of patient outcomes. Recently a new type of programmed cell death was discoveredβ€”necroptosis, which depends on receptor interacting protein 3 (RIPK3). Preclinical data showed that necroptotic cell death is an important effector mechanism of 5-FU-mediated anticancer activity. Purpose: To investigate the predictive and prognostic performance of RIPK3 expression in primary tumors. Methods: Colon cancer patients (n=74) with metastatic stage were included in this retrospective study and all were treated with first-line 5-FU based chemotherapy. Immunohistochemical staining was performed. Results: The progression free survival for the low expression group of RIPK3 was 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.4-6.8) vs 8.4 months (95% CI, 6.4-10.3) of the group with high expression (p=0.02). Moreover, patients with high expression of RIPK3 were associated with lower risk of disease progression HR 0.61 (95% CI, 0.38-0.97; p=0.044). Patients with high expression levels of RIPK3 also had significantly longer mean overall survival (OS) of 29.3 months (95% CI, 20.8-37.8) as compared with those with low expression: 18.5 months (95% CI, 15.06-21.9) (p= 0.036). In addition, univariate analysis showed that high level of RIPK3 expression was associated with a longer OS HR 0.59 (95% CI, 0.35-0.98; p=0.044). Conclusions: This study suggests that expression of RIPK3 in primary tumors of metastatic colon cancer patients should be further investigated for its potential as a promising predictive and prognostic marker
    corecore