Validity of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Registry:A Population-Based Study from the North Denmark Region

PURPOSE: The Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR) is recognized for providing high-quality data. However, only a few minor studies have validated inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) diagnoses in the DNPR, reporting various degrees of validity. To pave the way for large-scale studies of IBD in Denmark, we aimed to investigate the validity of IBD among >8000 patients registered in the DNPR between 2002 and 2020 in the North Denmark Region. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To evaluate the reliability of the diagnoses in the DNPR, we initially compared all patients registered with one IBD diagnosis during 2002–2020 to a list of already verified patients in the regional IBD database GASTROBIO. Medical records on all DNPR registered patients not on the list were manually reviewed by a gastroenterologist to verify or dismiss the IBD diagnosis. Positive predictive values (PPV) were calculated. RESULTS: Of 8040 patients with at least one IBD diagnosis in DNPR, 5263 were already confirmed cases, leaving 2777 for medical record evaluation, of whom 849 had IBD. In total, 6112 were correctly registered with IBD based on one diagnosis, and 1343 were incorrectly registered, resulting in a PPV of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.81–0.83). For patients registered with at least two diagnoses, the PPV was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.95–0.96), and with at least three diagnoses, the PPV was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.98–0.99). Results were similar for UC and CD separately. Of note, the completeness of valid cases went from 6112 to 4606 (75%; 95% CI, 74%-76%) when demanding at least two registered diagnoses and to 3320 (54%; 95% CI, 53%-56%) when demanding at least three registered diagnoses. CONCLUSION: Reassuringly, the validity of IBD diagnoses in DNPR is high, especially for patients registered more than once. However, the reduced completeness when applying a true case definition of at least two registered diagnoses should be considered

Prognostication in inflammatory bowel disease

Personalized care in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) hinges on parsing the heterogeneity of IBD patients through prognostication of their disease course and therapeutic response to allow for tailor-made treatment and monitoring strategies to optimize care. Herein we review the currently available predictors of outcomes in IBD and those on the both near and far horizons. We additionally discuss the importance of worldwide collaborative efforts and tools to support clinical use of these prognostication tools

Comparative Outcomes and Safety of Vedolizumab vs Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists for Older Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

IMPORTANCE: Observational comparative effectiveness studies can inform the positioning of biologic therapies for older patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who are underrepresented in clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab vs tumor necrosis factor (TNF) for older patients with IBD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This active comparator, new-user design, comparative effectiveness study was conducted between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2018, among 754 older patients (aged ≥50 years) with IBD from the Danish National Patient Register. The mean follow-up after treatment initiation took place at 32 to 40 weeks. Statistical analysis was performed from February 1 to April 27, 2022. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment with vedolizumab or TNF antagonists. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary effectiveness outcome was treatment failure, defined as the composite risk of IBD-related hospitalization, IBD-related surgery, or a new corticosteroid prescription more than 6 weeks after initiation of treatment with biologic therapy. Secondary effectiveness outcomes were time to each individual component of the composite effectiveness outcome. The primary safety outcome was the risk of serious infections, defined as infections requiring hospitalization. A 1:1 propensity score–matched analysis was conducted, accounting for patient-, disease-, and treatment-associated factors. RESULTS: The study compared 377 older patients with IBD with incident use of vedolizumab (202 women [53.6%]; mean [SD] age, 61.2 [8.3] years; 177 [46.9%] with Crohn disease) vs 377 patients with incident use of TNF antagonists (206 women [54.6%]; mean [SD] age, 61.3 [8.1] years; 182 [48.3%] with Crohn disease). Overall, vedolizumab was associated with an increased risk of treatment failure compared with TNF antagonists (1-year risk, 45.4% vs 34.7%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.02-1.69), including higher risk of IBD-related hospitalization (1-year risk, 27.8% vs 16.3%; adjusted HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.03-2.15) and IBD-related major abdominal surgery (1-year risk, 21.3% vs 8.0%; adjusted HR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.45-3.94). In subgroup analysis by IBD phenotype, among patients with Crohn disease, vedolizumab was associated with a 77% higher risk of treatment failure (adjusted HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.21-2.58), while no difference in risk of treatment failure was seen among patients with ulcerative colitis (adjusted HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.75-1.43; P = .03 for interaction). There was no significant difference in the risk of serious infections, overall (1-year risk, 8.2% vs 8.7%; adjusted HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.58-1.85) and by IBD phenotype. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this comparative effectiveness study of older patients with IBD, vedolizumab was associated with a higher risk of treatment failure compared with TNF antagonists, particularly among patients with Crohn disease, without offering a significant safety advantage

Characterizing the pre-clinical phase of inflammatory bowel disease

Understanding the biological changes that precede a diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) could facilitate pre-emptive interventions, including risk factor modification, but this pre-clinical phase of disease remains poorly characterized. Using measurements from 17 hematological and biochemical parameters taken up to 10 years before diagnosis in over 20,000 IBD patients and population controls, we address this at massive scale. We observe widespread significant changes in multiple biochemical and hematological parameters that occur up to 8 years before diagnosis of Crohn's disease (CD) and up to 3 years before diagnosis of ulcerative colitis. These changes far exceed previous expectations regarding the length of this pre-diagnostic phase, revealing an opportunity for earlier intervention, especially in CD. In summary, using a nationwide, case-control dataset-obtained from the Danish registers-we provide a comprehensive characterization of the hematological and biochemical changes that occur in the pre-clinical phase of IBD.</p

Body mass index in young men and risk of inflammatory bowel disease through adult life: A population-based Danish cohort study

Abstract Body mass index (BMI) is associated with increased future risk of inflammatory bowel disease(IBD) particularly Crohn’s disease(CD), where associations with high and low BMI have been observed. Most studies are based on adult women. We aimed to explore the impact of BMI in men entering adult life on their long-term risk of developing IBD. A total of 377,957 men born during 1939–1959, with BMI measured at draft boards at mean age 19, were followed from 1977, or time of examination, to end of 2015. Risk of IBD was assessed using Cox regression. During 13 million person-years of follow-up, 1,523 developed CD and 3,323 UC. Using normal weight as reference, for CD the following HRs were observed: BMI < 18.5, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.12–1.62, BMI 25–29.9; 0.83; 95% CI, 0.68–1.02. and BMI > 30 1.20; 95% CI, 0.75–1.90). The increased risk of CD in underweight was maintained up until age 60 not explained by known effects of smoking. For UC, minor inverse associations were observed. Restricted cubic splines revealed a U-shape association between BMI and CD, but not UC. Low BMI of men entering adult life is associated with an increased incidence of CD and UC up to 40 years later

Eosinophilic oesophagitis in Denmark:Population-based incidence and prevalence in a nationwide study from 2008 to 2018

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune‐mediated or antigen‐mediated oesophageal disease characterised by symptoms related to oesophageal dysfunction and eosinophil‐predominant inflammation. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to estimate the incidence and prevalence of EoE in Denmark during the period 2008–2018. METHODS: Based on data from nationwide registers we identified cases of EoE using two definitions: a broad definition based solely on oesophageal biopsies registered in the Danish Pathology Register and a narrow definition also including symptoms of oesophageal dysfunction registered in the Danish National Patient Registry. The annual incidence and prevalence were standardised by sex and age in 5‐year intervals to the 2013 study population. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2011, the standardised incidence of EoE was stable, but from 2011 to 2018 it increased from 3.9 (95% CI 3.3–4.4) to 11.7 (95% CI 10.8–12.6) per 100,000 person‐years. Similar temporal trends were observed when using the narrow EoE definition. The increase in incidence was most pronounced in men and in individuals above 40 years of age. In children, the EoE incidence was a fourth of the incidence in adults aged 40–64 years: 4.4 (95% CI 3.2–5.6) versus 17.6 (95% CI 15.7–19.5) per 100,000 person‐years. The EoE incidence varied substantially across the five regions in Denmark. Overall, the biopsy rate as well as the proportion of oesophageal biopsies with detected eosinophilia increased during the study period. CONCLUSION: This study of the entire population of Denmark during the period 2008 to 2018 shows that the incidence and prevalence of EoE is not yet plateauing and that EoE could be severely underdiagnosed, especially in children