A Meta‐analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Assessing Hemodialysis Access Thrombosis Based on Access Flow Monitoring: Where Do We Stand?

The National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative recommends the routine use of hemodialysis arteriovenous (AV) access surveillance to detect hemodynamically significant stenoses and appropriately correct them to reduce the incidence of thrombosis and to improve accesses patency rates. Access blood flow monitoring is considered as one of the preferred surveillance method for both AV fistulas (AVF) and AV grafts (AVG); however, published studies have reported conflicting results of its utility that led healthcare professionals to doubt the benefits of this surveillance method. We performed a meta‐analysis of the published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of AV access surveillance using access blood flow monitoring. Our hypothesis was that access blood flow monitoring lowers the risk of AV access thrombosis and that the outcome differs between AVF and AVG. The estimated overall pooled risk ratio (RR) of thrombosis was 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67–1.13) favoring access blood flow monitoring. The pooled RR of thrombosis were 0.64 (95% CI, 0.41–1.01) and 1.06 (95% CI, 0.77–1.46) in the subgroups of only AVF and only AVG, respectively. Our results added to the uncertainty of access blood flow monitoring as a surveillance method of hemodialysis accesses

Comparison of Mortality of ESRD Patients with Lupus by Initial Dialysis Modality

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Little is known regarding whether mortality among ESRD patients with SLE differs between those initiating with peritoneal dialysis (PD) versus hemodialysis (HD). This study compared the mortality risk of ESRD patients with SLE initiating with PD versus HD after matching their baseline sociodemographic and clinical factors. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Of 11,023 ESRD patients with SLE initiating dialysis with PD or HD between 1995 and 2006 with complete records in the US Renal Data System, 1352 pairs were matched on 13 predictors utilizing a predicted probability of group membership into the PD group using propensity score matching. The primary outcome was overall mortality. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular-related and infection-related mortality. Outcomes were compared between groups with survival statistics. The period of observation ended on December 31, 2009. The median follow-up was 3 years. RESULTS: Matched pairs were predominantly women (86%) with a median age of 39 years. Matched pairs had a balance (P≥0.05) of all baseline factors. Matched pairs had a similar risk of overall mortality (hazard ratio, 0.96 [95% confidence interval, 0.82 to 1.13]; mortality, 21.4% [290 to 1352] versus 22.5% [304 to 1352] for PD versus HD) within the first 3 years of observation. Matched pairs also had similar cardiovascular-related mortality (10.5% versus 9.5% for PD versus HD) and infection-related mortality (3% versus 4.4% for PD versus HD). CONCLUSIONS: In ESRD patients with SLE, the mortality was similar among those initiating with PD versus HD after predictors were matched between groups