Adverse neonatal outcome and veno-arterial differences in umbilical cord blood pH (ΔpH) at birth : a population-based study of 108,629 newborns

BACKGROUND: Umbilical cord blood gases are routinely used by midwives and obstetricians for quality assurance of birth management and in clinical research. They can form the basis for solving medicolegal issues in the identification of severe intrapartum hypoxia at birth. However, the scientific value of veno-arterial differences in cord blood pH, also known as ΔpH, is largely unknown. By tradition, the Apgar score is frequently used to predict perinatal morbidity and mortality, however significant inter-observer and regional variations decrease its reliability and there is a need to identify more accurate markers of perinatal asphyxia. The aim of our study was to investigate the association of small and large veno-arterial differences in umbilical cord pH, ΔpH, with adverse neonatal outcome.METHODS: This retrospective, population-based study collected obstetric and neonatal data from women giving birth in nine maternity units from Southern Sweden from 1995 to 2015. Data was extracted from the Perinatal South Revision Register, a quality regional health database. Newborns at ≥37 gestational weeks with a complete and validated set of umbilical cord blood samples from both cord artery and vein were included. Outcome measures included: ΔpH percentiles, 'Small ΔpH' (10th percentile), 'Large ΔpH' (90th percentile), Apgar score (0-6), need for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Relative risks (RR) were calculated with modified Poisson regression model.RESULTS: The study population comprised of 108,629 newborns with complete and validated data. Mean and median ΔpH was 0.08 ± 0.05. Analyses of RR showed that 'Large ΔpH' was associated with a decreased RR of adverse perinatal outcome with increasing UApH (at UApH ≥7.20: RR for low Apgar 0.29, P = 0.01; CPAP 0.55, P = 0.02; NICU admission 0.81, P = 0.01). 'Small ΔpH' was associated with an increased RR for low Apgar score and NICU admission only at higher UApH values (at UApH 7.15-7.199: RR for low Apgar 1.96, P = 0.01; at UApH ≥7.20: RR for low Apgar 1.65, P = 0.00, RR for NICU admission 1.13, P = 0.01).CONCLUSION: Large differences between cord venous and arterial pH (ΔpH) at birth were associated with a lower risk for perinatal morbidity including low 5-minute Apgar Score, the need for continuous positive airway pressure and NICU admission when UApH was above 7.15. Clinically, ΔpH may be a useful tool in the assessment of the newborn's metabolic condition at birth. Our findings may stem from the ability of the placenta to adequately replenish acid-base balance in fetal blood. 'Large ΔpH' may therefore be a marker of effective gas exchange in the placenta during birth

Evaluation of the microbiome in children’s appendicitis

Background/aim: The role of the microbiome has been widely discussed in the etiology of appendicitis. The primary aim was to evaluate the microbiome in the normal appendix and in appendicitis specifically divided into the three clinically and histopathologically defined grades of inflammation. Secondary aims were to examine whether there were any microbiome differences between proximal and distal appendices, and relate the microbiome with histopathological findings. Methods: A prospective pilot study was conducted of children undergoing appendectomy for appendicitis. The diagnosis was based on histopathological analysis. Children with incidental appendectomy were used as controls. The proximal and distal mucosa from the appendices were analyzed with 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Results: A total of 22 children, 3 controls and 19 appendicitis patients; 11 phlegmonous, 4 gangrenous, and 4 perforated appendices, were prospectively included. The amount of Fusobacterium increased and Bacteroides decreased in phlegmonous and perforated appendicitis compared to controls, but statistical significance was not reached, and this pattern was not seen in gangrenous appendicitis. No relation could be seen between different bacteria and the grade of inflammation, and there was a wide variation of abundances at phylum, genus, and species level within every specific group of patients. Further, no significant differences could be detected when comparing the microbiome in proximal and distal mucosa, which may be because the study was underpowered. A trend with more abundance of Fusobacteria in the distal mucosa was seen in appendicitis patients with obstruction (25 and 13 %, respectively, p = 0.06). Conclusion: The pattern of microbiome differed not only between groups, but also within groups. However, no statistically significant differences could be found in the microbiome between groups or clinical conditions. No correlation between a specific bacteria and grade of inflammation was found. In the vast majority of cases of appendicitis, changes in microbiome do not seem to be the primary event. Since there seem to be differences in microbiome patterns depending on the sample site, the exact localization of biopsy sampling must be described in future studies