145 research outputs found
Exploratory Study of Predicted Indirectly ReCognizable HLA Epitopes in Mismatched Hematopoietic Cell Transplantations
HLA-mismatches in hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation are associated with an
impaired overall survival (OS). The aim of this study is to explore whether the
Predicted Indirectly ReCognizable HLA-Epitopes (PIRCHE) algorithm can be used to
identify HLA-mismatches that are related to an impaired transplant outcome. PIRCHE
are computationally predicted peptides derived from the patient’s mismatched-HLA
molecules that can be presented by donor-patient shared HLA. We retrospectively
scored PIRCHE numbers either presented on HLA class-I (PIRCHE-I) or class-II
(PIRCHE-II) for a Dutch multicenter cohort of 103 patients who received a single
HLA-mismatched (9/10) unrelated donor transplant in an early phase of their disease.
These patients were divided into low and high PIRCHE-I and PIRCHE-II groups, based on
their PIRCHE scores, and compared using multivariate statistical analysis methods. The
high PIRCHE-II group had a significantly impaired OS compared to the low PIRCHE-II
group and the 10/10 reference group (HR: 1.86, 95%-CI: 1.02–3.40; and HR: 2.65,
95%-CI: 1.53–4.60, respectively). Overall, PIRCHE-II seem to have a more prominent
effect on OS than PIRCHE-I. This impaired OS is probably due to an increased risk
for severe acute graft-vs.-host disease. These data suggest that high PIRCHE-II scores
may be used to identify non-permissible HLA mismatches within single HLA-mismatched
hematopoietic stem-cell transplantations
Tradable Pollution Permits and the Regulatory Game
This paper analyzes polluters\u27 incentives to move from a traditional command and control (CAC) environmental regulatory regime to a tradable permits (TPP) regime. Existing work in environmental economics does not model how firms contest and bargain over actual regulatory implementation in CAC regimes, and therefore fail to compare TPP regimes with any CAC regime that is actually observed. This paper models CAC environmental regulation as a bargaining game over pollution entitlements. Using a reduced form model of the regulatory contest, it shows that CAC regulatory bargaining likely generates a regulatory status quo under which firms with the highest compliance costs bargain for the smallest pollution reductions, or even no reduction at all. As for a tradable permits regime, it is shown that all firms are better off under such a regime than they would be under an idealized CAC regime that set and enforced a uniform pollution standard, but permit sellers (low compliance cost firms) may actually be better off under a TPP regime with relaxed aggregate pollution levels. Most importantly, because high cost firms (or facilities) are the most weakly regulated in the equilibrium under negotiated or bargained CAC regimes, they may be net losers in a proposed move to a TPP regime. When equilibrium costs under a TPP regime are compared with equilibrium costs under a status quo CAC regime, several otherwise paradoxical aspects of firm attitudes toward TPP type reforms can be explained. In particular, the otherwise paradoxical pattern of allowances awarded under Phase II of the 1990 Clean Air Act\u27s acid rain program, a pattern tending to favor (in Phase II) cleaner, newer generating units, is explained by the fact that under the status quo regime, a kind of bargained CAC, it was the newer cleaner units that were regulated, and which therefore had higher marginal control costs than did the largely unregulated older, plants. As a normative matter, the analysis here implies that the proper baseline for evaluating TPP regimes such as those contained in the Bush Administration\u27s recent Clear Skies initiative is not idealized, but nonexistent CAC regulatory outcomes, but rather the outcomes that have resulted from the bargaining game set up by CAC laws and regulations
- …