Effect of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure and concurrent coronary atherosclerosis

AIMS: Prophylactic implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators (ICD) reduce mortality in patients with ischaemic heart failure (HF), whereas the effect of ICD in patients with non‐ischaemic HF is less clear. We aimed to investigate the association between concomitant coronary atherosclerosis and mortality in patients with non‐ischaemic HF and the effect of ICD implantation in these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were included from DANISH (Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Patients with Non‐Ischaemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality), randomizing patients to ICD or control. Study inclusion criteria for HF were left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35% and increased levels (>200 pg/mL) of N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide. Of the 1116 patients from DANISH, 838 (75%) patients had available data from coronary angiogram and were included in this subgroup analysis. We used Cox regression to assess the relationship between coronary atherosclerosis and mortality and the effect of ICD implantation. Of the included patients, 266 (32%) had coronary atherosclerosis. Of these, 216 (81%) had atherosclerosis without significant stenoses, and 50 (19%) had significant stenosis. Patients with atherosclerosis were significantly older {67 [interquartile range (IQR) 61–73] vs. 61 [IQR 54–68] years; P < 0.0001}, and more were men (77% vs. 70%; P = 0.03). During a median follow‐up of 64.3 months (IQR 47–82), 174 (21%) of the patients died. The effect of ICD on all‐cause mortality was not modified by coronary atherosclerosis [hazard ratio (HR) 0.94; 0.58–1.52; P = 0.79 vs. HR 0.82; 0.56–1.20; P = 0.30], P for interaction = 0.67. In univariable analysis, coronary atherosclerosis was a significant predictor of all‐cause mortality [HR, 1.41; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04–1.91; P = 0.03]. However, this association disappeared when adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors (age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, and estimated glomerular filtration rate) (HR 1.05, 0.76–1.45, P = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with non‐ischaemic systolic heart failure, ICD implantation did not reduce all‐cause mortality in patients either with or without concomitant coronary atherosclerosis. The concomitant presence of coronary atherosclerosis was associated with increased mortality. However, this association was explained by other risk factors

Early Gadolinium Enhancement for Area at Risk Determination: A Preclinical Validation Study

Objectives—The aim of this study was to determine if early gadolinium enhancement (EGE) by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in a canine model of reperfused myocardial infarction depicts the area at risk (AAR) as determined by microsphere blood flow analysis. Background—It remains controversial whether only the irreversibly injured myocardium enhances when performing CMR imaging in the setting of acute myocardial infarction. Recently, EGE has been proposed as a measure of the AAR in acute myocardial infarction as it correlates well with T2-weighted imaging of the AAR, but still requires pathological validation. Methods—Eleven dogs underwent 2 hours of coronary artery occlusion and 48 hours of reperfusion prior to imaging at 1.5T. EGE imaging was performed 3 minutes after contrast administration with coverage of the entire left ventricle. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging was performed between 10 and 15 minutes after contrast injection. AAR was defined as myocardium with blood flow (mL/min/g) \u3c 2SD from remote myocardium determined by microspheres during occlusion. The size of infarction was determined using triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC). Results—There was no significant difference in the size of enhancement by EGE compared to the size of AAR by microspheres (44.1± 15.8% vs. 42.7± 9.2%, p=0.61) with good correlation (r=0.88, p \u3c 0.001) and good agreement by Bland-Altman analysis (mean bias 1.4± 17.4%). There was no difference in the size of enhancement by EGE compared to enhancement on native T1 and T2 maps. The size of EGE was significantly greater than the infarct by TTC, (44.1± 15.8% vs. 20.7± 14.4%, p \u3c 0.001) and LGE (44.1± 15.8% vs. 23.5± 12.7%, p \u3c 0.001). Conclusion—At three minutes post-contrast, EGE correlated well with the AAR by microspheres and CMR, and was greater than infarct size. Thus, EGE enhances both reversibly and irreversibly injured myocardium

Impaired myocardial perfusion is associated with increasing end-systolic- and end-diastolic volumes in patients with non-ischemic systolic heart failure: a cross-sectional study using Rubidium-82 PET/CT

Abstract Background Myocardial flow reserve (MFR, stress/rest myocardial blood flow) is a strong marker of myocardial vasomotor function. MFR is a predictor of adverse cardiac events in patients with non-ischemic systolic heart failure and previous studies using different methods have found association between myocardial blood flow and left ventricular dilatation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is an association between increasing end-systolic- and end-diastolic volumes (ESV and EDV) and MFR in these patients measured with Rubidium-82 positron emission tomography computed tomography (82Rb-PET/CT) as a quantitative myocardial perfusion gold-standard. Methods We scanned 151 patients with non-ischemic heart failure with initial left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% with 82Rb-PET/CT at rest and adenosine-induced stress to obtain MFR and volumes. To account for differences in body surface area (BSA), we used indexed ESV (ESVI): ESV/BSA (ml/m2) and EDV (EDVI). We identified factors associated with MFR using multiple regression analyses. Results Median age was 62 years (55–69 years) and 31% were women. Mean MFR was 2.38 (2.24–2.52). MFR decreased significantly with both increasing ESVI (estimate − 3.7%/10 ml/m2; 95% confidence interval [CI] -5.6 to − 1.8; P < 0.001) and increasing EDVI (estimate − 3.5%/10 ml/m2; 95% CI -5.3 to − 1.6; P < 0.001). Results remained significant after multivariable adjustment. Additionally, coronary vascular resistance during stress increased significantly with increasing ESVI (estimate: 3.1 mmHg/(ml/g/min) per (10 ml/m2); 95% CI 2.0 to 4.3; r = 0.41; P < 0.0001) and increasing EDVI (estimate: 2.7 mmHg/(ml/g/min) per (10 ml/m2); 95% CI 1.6 to 3.8; r = 0.37; P < 0.0001). Conclusions Impaired MFR assessed by 82Rb-PET/CT was significantly associated with linear increases in ESVI and EDVI in patients with non-ischemic systolic heart failure. Our findings support that impaired microvascular function may play a role in heart failure development. Clinical trials investigating MFR with regard to treatment responses may elucidate the clinical use of MFR in patients with non-ischemic systolic heart failure. Trial registration Sub study of the randomized clinical trial: A DANish randomized, controlled, multicenter study to assess the efficacy of Implantable cardioverter defibrillator in patients with non-ischemic Systolic Heart failure on mortality (DANISH), ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00541268