2 research outputs found

    Integration of topic-specific pedagogical content knowledge components in secondary school science teachers’ reflections on biology lessons

    No full text
    Abstract Teachers’ reflections on their practice are a powerful tool for measuring and supporting their professional knowledge. Pedagogical content knowledge is one of the most influential domains of teacher professional knowledge. This multiple-case study investigated the topic-specific pedagogical content knowledge (TSPCK) components that Zambian secondary school science teachers integrate when reflecting on biology lessons. Three teachers from the same school were observed teaching a biology lesson and attended post-observation interviews. Data were mainly collected through lesson plans, lesson observation field notes and post-observation interviews. The data were analysed using in-depth analysis of explicit TSPCK, enumerative and constant comparative approaches. TSPCK maps were constructed to illustrate each teachers’ integration of TSPCK components. The results revealed four features about the integration of TSPCK components: (a) None of the teachers depended solely on a single TSPCK component as they integrated other components (b) The components curricular saliency, students’ prior knowledge and misconceptions, and conceptual teaching strategies were central in the TSPCK maps of all the teachers, while representations and analogies, and what make the topic easy/difficult to teach/learn were least integrated (c) All teachers had different pairs of reciprocal connections among TSPCK components, and (d) All teachers had different pairs of most integrated components. The implications of these findings for science and teacher education research were presented and discussed. It was concluded that teachers’ reflections revealed the integration between TSPCK components and showed them differently. The study recommends investigating teachers’ reflections over several lessons and tracking any changes in their TSPCK integration

    Analysis of conceptual understanding of solutions and titration among Rwandan secondary school students

    No full text
    AbstractThis study aimed to examine the effect of three teaching approaches: The traditional teaching method, Teacher based demonstration experiment (TBDE), and the Student hands-on experiment (SHE), on students’ conceptual understanding of solutions and titration. The data were collected using a chemistry achievement test (CAT) comprising of 30 multiple-choice questions, prepared according to four levels of Bloom’s taxonomy, including remembering, understanding, applying, and analyzing. The results reveal that TTM alone could help students attain conceptual understanding in the lower-level knowledge domain and showed a slight improvement in the application and analysis level. At the same time, a great misconception was observed in the level of understanding. On the other hand, the combination of TTM with laboratory experiments either by TBDE or SHE improved students’ conceptual understanding of the first three learning domains better than TTM alone. Supplementation of laboratory experiments also improved students’ percentage scores for questions that looked difficult before intervention. The current study recommends that chemistry teachers should combine TTM with a laboratory experiment to bridge the gap between theory and practice. However, despite the positive impact of laboratory experiments in the first three learning domains, their effectiveness seemed to be reduced at the level of analysis. This finding is because the level of inquiry was low. After all, students had to follow the experiment protocol prepared by the teacher. Therefore, we recommend further studies to explore the effect of inquiry-based learning laboratories on students’ conceptual understanding of solutions and titration
    corecore