Universality and Clustering in 1+1 Dimensional Superstring-Bit Models

We construct a 1+1 dimensional superstring-bit model for D=3 Type IIB superstring. This low dimension model escapes the problems encountered in higher dimension models: (1) It possesses full Galilean supersymmetry; (2) For noninteracting polymers of bits, the exactly soluble linear superpotential describing bit interactions is in a large universality class of superpotentials which includes ones bounded at spatial infinity; (3) The latter are used to construct a superstring-bit model with the clustering properties needed to define an $S$-matrix for closed polymers of superstring-bits.Comment: 11 pages, Latex documen

A Review of Prosthetic Interface Stress Investigations

Over the last decade, numerous experimental and numerical analyses have been conducted to investigate the stress distribution between the residual limb and prosthetic socket of persons with lower limb amputation. The objectives of these analyses have been to improve our understanding of the residual limb/prosthetic socket system, to evaluate the influence of prosthetic design parameters and alignment variations on the interface stress distribution, and to evaluate prosthetic fit. The purpose of this paper is to summarize these experimental investigations and identify associated limitations. In addition, this paper presents an overview of various computer models used to investigate the residual limb interface, and discusses the differences and potential ramifications of the various modeling formulations. Finally, the potential and future applications of these experimental and numerical analyses in prosthetic design are presented

Pasture manipulation on the Esperance sandplain, C W Thorn, 1982 1983

Introduction. Methods. Results

Pasture Manipulation - Grass control the year prior to cropping

Pasture manipulation - grass control the year prior to cropping. Aim 1. To measure the effects of various grass control treatments on pasture production and composition in the spraying year. 2. To measure the effects of grass control on wheat. Trial – 80MO41, 80MO40, 80AB2

Grass control in pastures.

Crop Yields after Pasture Manipulation in 1980. Effect of Grass Control on Pasture Production. Effect of Grass Control on Animal Production. Pasture Density Effects and Composition on Soil Nitrogen. The Effect of Kerb (R) on Rapeseed, Linseed and Barley Grass. 80M041, 80M040, 80AB2, 81A23, 81 A188, 81Ba2, 81 N3, 81 N2, 81 A11 81N21, 81Ka1, 81Ka2, 81 Na3, 81NO5, 81MO

Grass control in legume-grass pastures.

1. Crop results following grass control in 1981 Trials. 81AL1, 81Na3, 81Ba2, 81Kal, 81Ka2, 81N3, 81N21, 81A23, 81AL88. 2. Effect of grass control on animal production trials. 81M01, 82Na29. 3. Effect of grass control on take-all trials. 82LG25, 82Na30. 4. Effect of pasture density and composition on soil nitrogen trials. 81A24, 82Na5, 82WH32. 5. Grass control on rotations trials. 82E35, 79E15. 6. Grass control in re-seeded clover pastures trials. 82N16, 82WH26

The effect of chemical grass control in pastures on subsequent crop production and take all levels

To evaluate the effect of chemical grass control, 82LG25. Introduction. Methods. General notes on the trials. Results and discussion. Conclusions

Rotation trial for wheat

Trial report. Treatments. Measurements. Results and discussion. Conclusion